Share
A- A A+
Free Email News
Creation magazine print - 1 yr new subn


US $25.00
View Item
The Creation Answers Book
by Various

US $9.00
View Item

Feedback 13 May 2002 Positive

Appreciated Dr Wieland's response to Drs Gravendeel

Thank you for printing Dr. Carl Wieland's point-by-point response to Drs. Gravendeel's ‘critique’ of Dr. Wieland's article regarding the latest homo-erectus fossil find.

As I read Drs. Gravendeel's ‘critique’ it became increasingly clear that his argument was with the essence of Dr. Wieland's article rather than the substance of it.

For me the telling point was where Gravendeel, while claiming to speak on behalf of ‘evolution,’ objected to Dr. Wieland's reference to homo-erectus as ‘subhuman’ because the term supposedly implies that modern humans are ‘better’ than ‘earlier humans.’ While Dr. Wieland's point that ‘evolution’ is too loose of a concept for anyone to claim with specificity what ‘evolution teaches,’ Gravendeel's comment does reveal a common thread to evolutionary thinking which holds that human beings are no ‘better’ than lima beans or any other organism caught up in the purposeless journey called ‘evolution.’

His previous point notwithstanding, Drs. Gravendeel goes on to use the common term ‘sub-species’ without concern for any qualitative implications associated with the term. Clearly, Drs. Gravendeel's ‘critique’ was intended to shed smoke, not light.


Did you notice that there weren’t any ads or annoying page-covering pop ups on our site? Consider undergirding our efforts with a small donation today! Support this site

Copied to clipboard
2695
Product added to cart.
Click store to checkout.
In your shopping cart

Remove All Products in Cart
Go to store and Checkout
Go to store
Total price does not include shipping costs. Prices subject to change in accordance with your country’s store.