Back to the future
The dangers of messing with history
by Grant Zippel
Published: 31 December 2009(GMT+10)
Photo stock.xchng
How often have you said—“If only I knew then what I know now”?
We say this because we know that if we had made a different choice, the outcome
would be much better. Or, if history could be changed, then the present would be
different!
You may remember the enjoyable 1985 movie Back to the Future with a plot
that revolved around time-travel. Michael J. Fox starred as 17-year-old Marty McFly
who went back in time in a DeLorean sports car modified into a time-machine by his
best friend, Doc, an eccentric scientist. After Doc is murdered (by Libyan terrorists
from whom he had stolen plutonium to produce the nuclear power for his time machine),
the killers pursue Marty, so he jumps into the DeLorean and speeds away. Upon reaching
88 mph (141 kph), he is transported back to Nov 5th 1955 (the date Doc had entered
while showing Marty the time machine, explaining it as the day he conceived the
idea of the “flux capacitor” that “makes time travel possible”).
Upon arrival back in 1955, Marty accidentally messes up his young (future) parents’
first meeting. Marty must therefore ensure that his teenage parents-to-be meet and
fall in love. If they don’t, he has destroyed his own existence! The story
continues with many hysterical twists and turns but all turns out well due to Marty’s
“messing with history”!
Even though this story is fictional, we understand it because it is based on the
following concept: What actually happened in the past (real history) has a direct
and historical (real) connection to the future. Therefore, if we change people’s
belief about the past, so that they believe in a false history, we lay the foundation
to ruin their concept of reality for today and beyond.
For someone falsely convicted of murder, the jury believed a false version of history,
leading to an incorrect verdict. There are numerous recorded instances in which
an innocent person has been imprisoned, or in some cases executed! In order for
a jury to come to a correct verdict, what the jurists believe about the accused
person’s past must be true. One unknown fact, or wrong belief, can
drastically alter the entire picture. Change the history—change the outcome!
Messing with history
If you were to arrive at a movie late, allowing you to only see the last half of
the story, you would likely be confused about its ultimate meaning due to the unknown
‘facts’. The beginning is foundational to the story and provides the
context, setting and circumstances (history), upon which a solid understanding can
be built. Confuse the history—confuse the outcome!
Why would a loving God, who operates with consistent principles and laws, fool us
with the history about when and how He created the universe? If the “how”
is confusing and contradictory, then the “why” becomes meaningless!
This again is just like in a court case; if the when and how of the evidence is
confusing and contradictory, then this undermines the whole process and no conclusion
can be reached.
By messing with history, theological institutions are sawing off the branch upon
which they sit.
It would be inconsistent with God’s character to provide a confusing history!
Jesus often said (to those who doubted His words), “Haven’t you read
… ?” (Matthew 19:4–6; 22:9,31) pointing back to the written
history—showing that truth is built on real events! Why would He need to point
this out if the Bible is not referring to something that is true and historical?
Jesus also said, “I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe;
how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?” (John 3:12). Jesus is obviously speaking of “real and
physical” events when he says “earthly things”.
For those theologians (or Christian leaders) who say the early history of the world
(as stated in Genesis 1–11) is not correct or important, I would
challenge them to apply this principle to someone falsely accused of murder. Would
such an accused person fall for the idea that the jury’s beliefs (regarding
their whereabouts and actions in relation to the crime committed) were not important?
Truth about the past does matter. Change or confuse the history—change or
confuse the outcome!
Those within the church who accept a history other than what is clearly stated in
the Bible (6-day, young universe approx 6,000 years), are dumping the true account
of history on the rubbish pile. Even if they are silent on the issue, by neglect
they are allowing any popular notion on the issue to take hold, therefore undermining
what Scripture says in many impressionable minds. When numerous Hebrew experts (both
secular and Christian) say that the words in Genesis can only mean “6 days,
around 6,000 years ago, with a global flood”, alternative options regarding
what God is saying to us diminish rapidly. To believe the words are anything but
“historical narrative” makes one wonder when words begin to mean anything
at all. Professor Marcus Dods, though not one who believed Genesis as true history,
said about Genesis 1–11 that “if, for example, the word
‘day’ in these chapters does not mean a period of twenty-four hours,
the interpretation of Scripture is hopeless”; and that such interpretations
“do violence to Scripture [and] foster a style of interpretation by which
the text is forced to say whatever the interpreter desires”.
CMI has received many testimonies (including my own) from those who wrestled with
the truth of the biblical account on origins after adopting a wrong view (many times
from church leaders or seminary lecturers). Many have struggled for years before
finding the truth and recommitting themselves. Sadly, too many others have abandoned
their faith, never realizing they had been sold a lie. Change the history, change
the outcome!
There are professing Christians who oppose CMI and make statements like “faith
isn’t logical” or “I don’t need evidence”. I find
them ill-prepared to answer any questions from doubters or unbelievers. Such Christians
lack a solid understanding of what they believe, so they are unable to give a solid
defence for Christianity beyond their own “experience”. “Just
have faith”, they say! To an unbeliever this approach would be no different
than a child with an imaginary friend refusing to address any evidence to the contrary.
With a naïve smile, they continue to indulge in their little fantasy. Reality
seems to be unimportant! Their faith is merely a subjective personal belief, just
one more opinion, rather than being based on objective truth supported by solid
reasoning and tested by history and real-world events.
Sadly, answers cannot be found in most of our theological institutions either, as
they are becoming increasingly committed to a philosophy (evolution) which corrodes
the very foundation upon which they rest. By messing with history, they are sawing
off the branch upon which they sit.
Many reject Christianity because it does not line up with what they believe to be
factual (evolutionary theory). The real facts regarding the history of how this
wonderful (but fallen) world came into being (Genesis 1-11) have been replaced with the fairy story of
evolution. It is then all too easy for people to think that the Bible does not fit
these (perceived) ‘scientific facts’, therefore it is not connected
with reality—so why bother?
Calvin Smith writes:
“As a non-believer growing up, I was not impressed by what I saw as the hypocrisy
of Christians wanting me to believe one area of the Bible as plainly written while
squirming and re-interpreting other parts. I was an atheist but I wasn’t stupid.
Atheists know that without Genesis as history, Christianity will fall. No wonder
the opponents of Christianity have applied so much effort to discredit this area
of Scripture.”
We have exchanged a story which tells us who we are and where we are headed, for
one that leaves us rootless and directionless… let us get on our knees and
repent.
And here is one last quote from someone who became convinced a different “history”
took place to what he was taught at church:
“As were many persons from Alabama, I was a born again Christian. When I was
15, I entered the Southern Baptist Church with great fervor and interest in the
fundamentalist religion. I left at 17 when I got to the University of Alabama and
heard about evolutionary theory.” (Harvard Professor E.O. Wilson.)
As Marty McFly discovered in Back to the Future, it’s very dangerous
to mess with history (facts).
There seems little doubt that the replacement of the biblical account of history
with that of “natural” science has been a disaster. We have exchanged
a story which tells us who we are and where we are headed, for one that leaves us
rootless and directionless. Where we have failed on this issue, let us get on our
knees and repent. Let us gently show people (e.g. using CMI materials) that their
evolutionary beliefs are not based on science at all, but are an attempt to remove
God from the picture! By doing so we may help to change that person’s future
for eternity.
Related articles
Further reading
Recommended Resources
| Evolution is supported and endorsed by governments, the media, our major educational institutions and many big businesses. But look at this site and see how much can be achieved with a little effort from God’s people.  | | |
|
