Baptist school afraid of creation
Hard to believe—but true.
Published:
October 28, 2000(GMT+10)
In June, and then in July of 2000, we reported on the controversy at the Baptist
Baylor University campus over what is called the “Polanyi Center”. This
is a special department which was set up to research the concept of “intelligent
design” with a view to its promotion in the sciences.
A remarkable series of events occurred recently, however, that should cause every
Christian to see how far once very great Christian colleges have fallen.
On October 19 the Baylor Public Relations Department reported that the director
of the Center, Dr. William Dembski, was relieved of his duties. According to a statement
subsequently issued by Dr. Dembski, the reason for his dismissal was that he “released
a press statement applauding the results of the peer review committee that passed
upon and approved the academic soundness of my work.”*
Now read the statement that apparently upset the faculty at Baylor. The External
Peer Review Committee report stated that:
“it considers research on the logical structure of mathematical arguments
for intelligent design to have a legitimate claim to a place in current discussions
of the relations of religion and the sciences.”
So why would such a statement cause problems? Well, even though this particular
center did not argue for a literal Genesis—including six literal days, etc.—
the faculty obviously didn’t want to be associated with anything (even a center
that was just dealing with “intelligent design” in the universe) that
would even hint at Baylor supporting a message that could cause anyone to think
they supported what they call “creation science.”
The president of Baylor University, Robert B. Sloan, Jr., in addressing the controversy,
asserted in an October 19 statement* that “‘creation
science’ is not good theology, and I would be embarrassed for what I understand
to be creation science to be taught at Baylor University.” In the same statement
he affirms his belief in a Creator God, but that, “Whether or not there are
patterns of design, information and purpose in this universe that can be detected
by scientific processes, I do not know.”
No wonder the church and the secular world are confused on this topic. Here is someone
from a supposed “Christian university” saying that the evidence of the
handiwork of the Creator would not necessarily be able to be detected by scientists?
How could a Creator God not leave demonstrable evidence of intelligent design
in what He created (even in a fallen universe as we know it today)? This is an example
of how far things have deteriorated in our culture. A Baptist school is afraid,
not just of acknowledging a Creator, but of even admitting that His handiwork would
be obvious.
If only these academics would pick up a Bible, and put aside their evolutionary
science texts for a moment, they could read, “…
that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto
them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly
seen, being understood by the things that are made” (Romans 1:19,
20).
What a sad day when so-called “Christian universities” like this not
only reject a literal Genesis, but want to be disassociated from a center that researches
even the vaguest notions of “creation.”
*Statement
In a tersely worded statement (Oct. 19, 2000), the university claimed that Dr. Dembski
was not “collegial.” Nothing more specific was stated. Given that the
Baylor faculty had become “up in arms” over the center (see our related
story [July 14]), the uncollegial label has been misapplied
to Dr. Dembski. A demoted Dr. Dembski remains on campus as an associate research
professor.
Further reading
| They say you can’t go home again. I don’t know where that came from, but it can’t be true. Creation.com is my home page and I go there every day. How about you? Support CMI.  | | |
|
