Share
A- A A+
Free Email News
Biblical Biology 101 DVD
by Dominic Statham

US $13.00
View Item
The Complete Zoo Adventure
by Mary and Gary Parker

US $17.00
View Item
Evidence for Creation: Intelligent Answers for Open Minds
by Tom DeRosa

US $5.00
View Item
One small Speck to Man: the evolution myth
by Vij Sodera

US $69.00
View Item

Eden Zoo1

123rf.com/cocozero003

Tiger

by

Published: 18 June 2013 (GMT+10)

Adam was the world’s first ‘taxonomist’. A taxonomist is a person who seeks to organise all the living organisms into a logical system. As well as the task of serving and guarding the Garden of Eden, Adam had the great task of naming all the animals and birds. Eden became the first zoo. Taxonomy should not be dull and boring. It should be worship!

It is striking that Adam’s call to glorify God should involve him in caring for plants and animals. It seems that in a special way these living organisms display something of God’s glory which it is right we should examine and proclaim.

True Biology is worship.

God’s call to worship him in the study of living organisms does not end with Adam. When God answers Job it seems as if Job is again put in Adam’s position. God gives him a lesson in zoology:

He tells Job to “Look now at the behemoth … .” (Job 40:15) and asks him “Can you draw out Leviathan?” (Job 41:1).

The primary sin of modern biology is not abortion, euthanasia or an attempt to redefine human sexuality. It is more fundamental. It is the sin of failing to worship the owner and creator of all life.

Jesus tells us to consider the ravens and the beauty of the lilies.

Prof. John Murray, when he first observed a Giant redwood tree, slapped his knee and said with deepest reverence, “Isn’t that grand!”2

The primary sin of modern biology is not abortion, euthanasia or an attempt to redefine human sexuality. It is more fundamental. It is the sin of failing to worship the owner and creator of all life. In Acts 3:15 the Apostle Peter accuses the Jews gathered outside the temple of killing the ‘Architect’ of life.3 Modern biology does the same thing but in a different way.

The biblical view of life puts the mind and power of God behind the variety of life. It is true that all biology ‘under the sun’ is fallen biology and is all under enslavement to decay (Rom 8:21). Nevertheless it still speaks of the glory of God. Modern biology, however, seeks to gag the testimony of biology to its designer.

Modern biology seeks to remove any intelligent and artistic input from a divine architect and attempts to join all of life together in a single family, with all its variation caused by genetic mistakes combined with natural selection. The following diagram contrasts this evolutionary view with the biblical creationist understanding:

Atheistic Taxonomy does not work

CC BY-SA 2.5/Wikimedia commons

lynn margulis

The late Lynn Margulis, a leading biologist famous for proposing the evolutionary idea of endosymbiosis. This purports to explain how eukaryotic cells with mitochondria and chloroplasts first originated.

Modern taxonomy, however, is struggling to make the reality of life fit into the materialistic evolutionary straightjacket that it is committed to.

Renowned biologist Lynn Margulis was known as something of a heretic in evolutionary circles. She regarded the neo-Darwinist view of life as basically wrong. She described natural selection as simply a stabilising influence. She agreed with the geologists Eldredge and Gould that gradual change is absent from the fossil record and argued for rapid evolutionary change, as a result of symbiosis (interaction between two different living organisms.) In an interview toward the end of her life she made a number of revealing comments.4 She admitted,

“The critics, including the creationist critics, are right about their criticism. It’s just that they’ve got nothing to offer but intelligent design or ‘God did it.’ They have no alternatives that are scientific.”

She described one of the moments which caused her to abandon neo-Darwinism as the complete explanation for life:

“Population geneticist Richard Lewontin gave a talk here at UMass Amherst5 about six years ago, and he mathematized all of it (neo-darwinism)—changes in the population, random mutation, sexual selection, cost and benefit. At the end of his talk he said, ‘You know, we’ve tried to test these ideas in the field and the lab, and there are really no measurements that match the quantities I’ve told you about.’ This just appalled me. So I said, ‘Richard Lewontin, you are a great lecturer to have the courage to say it’s gotten you nowhere. But then why do you continue to do this work?’ And he looked around and said, ‘It’s the only thing I know how to do, and if I don’t do it I won’t get my grant money.’ So he’s an honest man, and that’s an honest answer.”

The tree of life keeps falling over.

Margulis became famous for proposing a radically different view of taxonomy to all that had gone before. She proposed that more complex cells had originated by engulfing simpler ones.6 Eventually her ideas became mainstream.

Renowned biologist Lynne Margulis was known as something of a heretic in evolutionary circles. She regarded the neo-Darwinist view of life as basically wrong. She described natural selection as simply a stabilising influence.

More recently an article in an American magazine, The Scientist, had the provocative title ‘Uprooting the tree of life’7 and a still more recent New Scientist front page carried this heading: ‘Darwin was wrong—cutting down the tree of life.’8

In June 2012 the prestigious journal Nature published a review of the work of Kevin Peterson who uses a new technique to classify organisms. His new technique uses a special family of genes which are thought to be able to give a good insight into the relationships between organisms.

In his description of his results he says “I’ve looked at thousands of microRNA genes, and I can’t find a single example that would support the traditional [evolutionary] tree … ”

“The microRNAs are totally unambiguous,” he says, “but they give a totally different tree from what everyone else wants.”

Surely the reason that modern taxonomy is having such a struggle to produce a settled single tree of life is that no such tree actually exists.

CC BY-SA 3.0

microRNA

An example of microRNA

A new biology

According to our gospel not only will the single tree of life explanation ultimately fail but the whole of biology is set for a grand new start.

A solitary human death of a real man, who was more than a man, will not only redeem a countless multitude of human beings from sin and death but will also have glorious consequences for the whole of created reality. The Apostle Paul tells us of the final emancipation of creation, with a special emphasis on biology, which will be released from its current position of slavery to death and decay and will be swallowed up by life.

Psalm 8 speaks of the final glorious position of humanity, “crowned with glory and honour.” It speaks of the second Adam with a restored new creation whose united voice, with all its multitude of restored living creatures, will bring glory to its maker:

O LORD our Lord, How excellent is Your name in all the earth!

Related Articles

Further Reading

References

  1. Used by kind permission of Evangelical Times, the article first appeared on their website, April 2013, www.evangelical-times.org. Return to text.
  2. Thomas, G., God turned chaos into Cosmos, Banner of Truth, www.banneroftruth.org, accessed 16 May 2013. Return to text.
  3. Teresi, D., Lynn Margulis, Discover, April 2011, pp. 66–71. Return to text.
  4. In some versions, this is translated as ‘Prince of life’ or ‘author of life’. Return to text.
  5. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Return to text.
  6. This is termed endosymbiosis. For a detailed discussion of why this idea fails to explain the origin of eukaryotic cells, see creation.com/non-evolution-apoptosis. Return to text.
  7. Maher, B., 16 September 2002, www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/14233/title/Uprooting-the-Tree-of-Life/ accessed 16 May 2013. Return to text.
  8. New Scientist cover, 24 January 2009. It refers to a feature article by Lawton, G., www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126921.600-why-darwin-was-wrong-about-the-tree-of-life.html, accessed 16 May 2013. Return to text.

Manna from heaven? Because this site and the information it contains is free, you might think so. However, lots of hard work went into producing it. Your gifts help to produce this ‘manna’ for others. Support this site

Comments closed
Article closed for commenting.
Only available for 14 days from appearance on front page.
Readers’ comments
Terry P., Australia, 18 June 2013

Christianity is based on science.

         The scientific method sets up an hypothesis and validates it with empirical evidence.

       Aside from all the eyewitness evidence of turning water into wine, stilling the storm with a word, etc., Jesus posited that he would raised himself from the dead on the third day after crucifixion.

        Jesus hypothesised he would raise himself from the dead, and the fact was observed by hundreds of eye witnesses. Proved his claim to be God in a human body, the author of life.

graham P., New Zealand, 18 June 2013

Excellent. The glory of God is revealed in the animals: His power in the lions and tigers, His mercy in the lambs and sheep, His majesty in the eagles, His infinite care in the butterfly, His sheer creative genius in the Peacock......even a child sees this immediately.

Joseph M., United Kingdom, 18 June 2013

“The critics, including the creationist critics, are right about their criticism. It’s just that they’ve got nothing to offer but intelligent design or ‘God did it.’ They have no alternatives that are scientific.”

I cannot understand how an educated intelligent person can make such a statement and not see that an ‘intelligence source’ is scientifically testable. Archaeologists use science to test for intelligent sources every time they look at a stone, landscape, grouping, etc. to decide whether the existing function is created or not. These same principles are used when looking for intelligent life in the universe by listening for coded signals, design in landscapes or anything, etc. Yet, these scientific techniques are ignored when looking at the cell!?

Jer. 5:21 (King James version): "Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not."

Chandrasekaran M., Australia, 18 June 2013

It is obvious that the evolution science is upside down in the sense that the evolution tree of life is granted true regardless of the evidences in biology, even in the fallen world, and then evolutionists try hard to sequence the evidences in biology into the framework of the hypothetical tree.

In the evolution of almost nothing to cosmos to primordial soup to moral human paradigm, the evolution tree of life can be attached to the framework of the string theory which is supposed to explain all fundamental forces.

A. R., United Kingdom, 19 June 2013

It's refreshing as a scientist to see a well-known biologist who has the honesty to be open about the problems like this and even admit that the creationist critics are right! Wow, that's quite an admission!

It's just a shame that her mind wouldn't stretch to accepting that the reason why things didn't make sense scientifically was because God IS the answer. It is incredibly sad that she had so much insight scientifically, but not spiritually. (She was such a gifted woman, but it grieves me that she now knows that there is a God, that she found a HUGE clue that pointed to that while she was alive and cannot now change it.)

Very interesting that Richard Lewontin appears to have problems with the science too, but sadly, I doubt whether he will let that "Divine Foot" in the door... I guess we should pray for him while he still has the opportunity.

I hope and pray that more scientists will drop their scientific pride and let themselves think what to many is intellectually unthinkable.

I think Romans 1 says it all in that department.

Comments closed
Article closed for commenting.
Only available for 14 days from appearance on front page.
Copied to clipboard
9274
Product added to cart.
Click store to checkout.
In your shopping cart

Remove All Products in Cart
Go to store and Checkout
Go to store
Total price does not include shipping costs. Prices subject to change in accordance with your country’s store.