Share
A- A A+

Article from:

Creation  Volume 31Issue 1 Cover

Creation 31(1):22–23
December 2008

Free Email News
Creation magazine print - 1 yr new subn


US $25.00
View Item
The Creation Answers Book
by Various

US $14.00
View Item
Creation  Volume 31 Issue 1 Cover

First published:
Creation
31(1):22–23
December 2008

Browse this issue

Subscribe to Creation magazine

That ‘face on mars ’…

by

NASA

Mars

While photographing potential landing sites for future manned missions to Mars, on 1 July 1976, NASA’s Viking 1 revealed some unusual features on the Martian surface. One structure which was roughly 1.9 km x 2.6 km (1.2 x 1.6 miles) looked like a human-like face complete with headdress (see figure 1). Suddenly, newspapers all over the world were proclaiming ‘The Face on Mars.’

In this same region of Mars, called Cydonia, other structures that resembled pyramids were seen. The images became a sensation, and very quickly thoughts turned to what type of aliens built them, and where they might have come from!

NASA’s attempted quashing only increased the conspiratorial notions that ‘true believers’ in the UFO movement already thought they ‘knew’—namely, that governments cover up the truth about UFOs and alien visitations.

NASA tried to calm speculation that advanced alien civilizations created the structures. But as I have discovered over many years of research into the UFO phenomenon, the true believers never let the facts get in the way of a good story. NASA’s attempted quashing only increased the conspiratorial notions that ‘true believers’ in the UFO movement already thought they ‘knew’—namely, that governments cover up the truth about UFOs and alien visitations.

The idea that a long-lost Martian civilization built the structures was propagated mainly by Richard C. Hoagland, a self-promoting ‘science advisor’, who even assisted respected TV newsman Walter Cronkite during the Apollo mission broadcasts.

NASA/JPL

Viking first image that started it all in 1976

Figure 1. Viking 1’s image that started it all in 1976.

The 1980s saw the UFO phenomenon explode. The book The Roswell Incident had taken root in popular culture with its false claims that an alien spacecraft crash-landed in New Mexico in 1947, and that the government hid wreckage and alien bodies retrieved from the site.1

In 1987 Hoagland released his book The Monuments of Mars: A City on the Edge of Forever, dubbing this area of Cydonia, ‘The City Square’. Controversy sells, and Hoagland’s claims became very popular. He went even further by claiming that intelligent races once existed on our own moon and also on the moons of Jupiter and Saturn. For years, famous UFO believers such as Erich Von Däniken in his best-selling book Chariots of the Gods (1968) had claimed that older, more advanced aliens had built the pyramids of Egypt and other structures. Now that ‘pyramid structures’ were seen on Mars, it seemed to add weight to claims about ancient extraterrestrials leaving their calling cards in our solar system. This also added weight to a theory of our origins known as ‘directed panspermia’2 in which primordial life on Earth was deliberately seeded by aliens, and evolution did the rest.

So what were these structures?

NASA/JPL/Malin Space Science Systems

A picture from the Mars Global Surveyor revealed there was no ‘face’

Figure 2. A 2001 picture from the Mars Global Surveyor revealed there was no ‘face’.

These rampant speculations were primarily based on two massive suppositions.

  1. That evolution was true because it occurred on Earth. Therefore, in a billions-of-years-old universe, alien races much older than our own could (even should) have evolved elsewhere, by now literally teeming throughout this enormous universe. If they were much older, they theoretically had the time to develop technologies much greater than our own. These space-travelling aliens could have created these artefacts thousands of years ago.
  2. That the structures on Mars were the result of purposeful design. But they weren’t, as will be shown.

Were NASA’s denials a coverup?

Despite the abundance of conspiracy theories, it should be remembered that space agencies like NASA would love nothing more than to find evidence of alien races. In recent years they have struggled for relevance and funding, and they know of the huge public interest in the possibility of extraterrestrial life. NASA’s long-running Origins program, which helped funding immensely, was created to search for life in space, and led to the modern field of astrobiology.3 Finding ETs would be a huge boon for NASA.

However, more detailed photos of Cydonia by NASA’s 1998 Mars Global Surveyor expedition poured cold water on the ET claims about the ‘Face’. They revealed that the ‘face’ and ‘pyramids’ were no more than naturally eroded landforms (see figure 2). With the light at a certain angle the illusion of a face seemed to be present. But these pictures from a different angle showed little in the way of the sorts of design features that anyone could claim were purposeful.

ESA/DLR/FU Berlin (G. Neukum), MOC (Malin Space Science Systems).

The latest high resolution photos from ESA’s Mars Express confirm it is just a naturally occurring landform

Figure 3. The latest high resolution photos from ESA’s Mars Express confirm it is just a naturally occurring landform.

Mars appears to have been, and may still be, geologically active. There are mountains and volcanoes, including the enormous Olympus Mons—the tallest volcano in the solar system.4 There are also networks of channels and canyons that suggest water once flowed in abundance there.5 The ‘Face’ and pyramids are nothing more than the remnants of such geologic activity.

And now, from another source, there is more evidence to debunk the ‘Face’ claims. Not long ago, the space probe Mars Express of the European Space Agency (ESA) sent back the highest resolution photos ever taken of Cydonia. Gerhard Neukum, principal investigator for the Mars Express camera, says he received hundreds of e-mails asking for new pictures. ‘Some of them even said, “NASA is lying, we want the truth”.’ He says the conspiracy theorists went quiet after the release of the image shown (figure 3).6

A new religion

The belief that ‘more evolved’ advanced aliens exist, who will return someday to solve our petty squabbles, fix ozone holes and solve global warming, etc. is not supported by any credible evidence. It has unquestionably become a new religion. Tragically, people are looking for meaning, purpose and hope of a new future in all the wrong places. They choose to ignore (2 Peter 3:5) the abundant evidence of the Creator God of the Bible—the Creator whose truth would indeed set them free and give them a sure and certain hope (John 8:32).

NASA/JPL-Caltech/Cornell University

Female Figure on Mars Just a Rock

Female Figure on Mars Just a Rock, <www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080124-bad-mystery-mars.html>, 5 March 2008.

A little man on Mars?

In January this year, the media again promoted unwarranted speculation about intelligent life on Mars. The NASA rover Spirit returned a photo of what appeared to be a ‘person’ sitting down and pointing. NASA ridiculed the claims, saying it was only a few yards from the camera and the rock no more than a few inches high. Astronomer Phil Plait of the Bad Astronomy Web site said, ‘If the image really is of a man on Mars, he’s awfully small. Talk about a tempest in a teacup! It’s just our natural tendency to see familiar shapes in random objects.’

References and notes

  1. See Bates, G., What really happened at Roswell? Creation 29(4):19–21, 2007; <creation.com/roswell>, 6 July 2007. Return to text.
  2. From the Greek words pas/pan (all) and sperma (seed) Return to text.
  3. For example, the two rovers that landed on the Martian surface in 2004 (Spirit and Opportunity), are still relaying data back to NASA. These, and the more recent Phoenix lander (May 2008), are part of the Origins program. Return to text.
  4. Mt Everest could fit inside its crater. Return to text.
  5. See Bates, G., Water, water where are you? Creation 27(3):23–26, 2005; <creation.com/mars-water>. Return to text.
  6. Nature 443(7110):379, 28 September 2006. Return to text.

(Also available in Portuguese)


Give $5 for 5. Although this article may have only taken 5 minutes to read, it could have taken over 5 hours to write. Consider a $5 donation to support our ministry efforts. Support this site

Comments closed
Article closed for commenting.
Available only from day of publication.
A reader’s comment
Aleksandar K., Croatia, 4 February 2013

What about the pyramids? It is claimed that they are all five-sided (I don't know how you say it in English) with an orientation to the Face. You don't go into details about the alleged pyramids. If it is shown that those structures were formed beyond mathematical probability (by chance), can it be said that it was built by an intelligent hand? Of course, everybody thinks about aliens but I was wandering if this could point to an ancient human civilization. We know that the pyramids all over the world were probably built by some unknown technology. That's why many invoke aliens as the architects. But it is clear that early humans possessed technology that we today cannot begin to fathom. It is also known that some civilizations built flying machines, which are also often attributed to aliens (as in, the humans were to stupid back then to build such a thing). Maybe some of these machines went beyond Earth's atmosphere. Is it possible that early humans weren't Earth bound? There is strong indication that Mars was once warm with liquid water. Evolutionists speak of billions of years but we know better. Could it be that Mars was once more hospitable than it is today and therefore more attractive to visit? Easier to build something on it? If those structures, for the sake of argument, really are pyramids, maybe some human civilization put them there for the same reason as other civilizations did following some (unknown) master plan, as there is a pattern in the (unknown) building technology and the distribution around the globe.

Carl Wieland responds

There is nothing about pyramids which suggests anything other than that they were indeed built by ‘an intelligent hand’, i.e. that of their ancient Egyptian builders and architects. They demonstrate the ingenuity and creativity that has always characterized humanity, made in God’s image. But it is simply not true to say that ‘we know’ that they were built by ‘some unknown technology’. So I agree with you that ancient man was a lot cleverer than evolutionary belief tends to allow for. However, that does not mean that the ancients had high-tech. See Computers on the Ark? Being smarter than us does not mean that their technology had reached the same levels. And as far as speculating about master plans, etc. it would first have to be established that there are intelligently constructed structures on other planets. So far, there is not a shred of evidence in favour of that notion, so there is no point discussing and speculating until there is such evidence.

Copied to clipboard
7028
Product added to cart.
Click store to checkout.
In your shopping cart

Remove All Products in Cart
Go to store and Checkout
Go to store
Total price does not include shipping costs. Prices subject to change in accordance with your country’s store.