A- A A+

Article from:

Journal of Creation  Volume 22Issue 3 Cover

Journal of Creation 22(3):9–11
December 2008

Free Email News
Chemicals to Living Cell: Fantasy or Science? DVD
by Dr Jonathan Sarfati

US $13.00
View Item

Germ’s miniature motor has a clutch


Published: 8 July 2008 (GMT+10)

Bacterial flagellum: powered by an electric motor

Illustration Wikipedia Bacterial

Figure 1. The bacterial flagellum (with rotary motor) has many features which people recognize as design features, such as a clutch.

Many bacteria are powered by real electrical outboard motors, only 45 nm in diameter.1 These motors connect to long, thin, whip-like helical filaments several times as long as the germ, via a universal joint. This converts the rotary motion of the motor into wavelike motions in the filament. The motor comprises a stator, rotor, drive shaft and bushing that guides the driveshaft out through the cell wall. ‘The assemblage of motor and filament is called a flagellum.1 Bacteria often have several flagella, and their concerted motion enables the cell to swim at 35 cell lengths per second.1

While our electrical motors are powered by a negatively charged current (electron flow in wires), the flagellar motor is powered by positively charged current. This is a flow of hydrogen ions (protons, H+), from the outside to the inside of the cell (except for marine bacteria and bacteria that live in very alkaline conditions (i.e. low concentration of H+), where sodium ions are used instead). The proton movement is driven by either an electrical or pH gradient, and the energy to generate this gradient comes from the oxidation of its food. The proton flow changes the shape of one of the stator proteins, which exerts a force on one of the rotor proteins, thereby driving the rotor.1 A recent article said:

‘The flagellum is one of nature’s smallest and most powerful motors—ones like those produced by B. subtilis can rotate more than 200 times per second, driven by 1,400 piconewton-nanometers of torque. That’s quite a bit of (miniature) horsepower for a machine whose width stretches only a few dozen nanometers.’2

A clutch

This same article reported on another astounding discovery: that this motor even has a clutch to disconnect the motor from the filament. Scientists from Indiana University Bloomington (IU) and Harvard University actually discovered this by accident when researching biofilms.3

Bacterial flagellum with rotary motor, with the following features

Bacterial flagellum with rotary motor
  • Self assembly and repair
  • Water-cooled rotary engine
  • Proton motive force drive system
  • Forward and reverse gears
  • Operating speeds of up to 100,000 rpm
  • Direction reversing capability within 1/4 of a turn
  • Hard-wired signal transduction system with short-term memory
  • Clutch to disconnect filament from motor when required

[from Bacterial Flagella: Paradigm for Design, video, <>, and the update in this article for the last one]

These are slimy sheets a fraction of a millimetre thick that form on any surface that has a supply of nutrients and water, including teeth and pipes.4

IU biologist Daniel Kearns, the project leader, explains:

‘We were trying to get at how the bacterium’s ability to move and biofilm formation are balanced. We were looking for the genes that affected whether the cells are mobile or stationary. Although B. subtilis is harmless, biofilms are often associated with infections by pathogenic bacteria. Understanding biofilm formation may eventually prove useful in combating bacterial infections.’2,5

That is, the fast and furious motions of the bacteria might disrupt the formation of biofilms, so the bacteria need some means of stopping it quickly. The researchers discovered that a protein called EpsE was responsible somehow. But how did it work? There were two possibilities: One possibility is a brake, locking up the motor so preventing it spinning; another is simply to disconnect the motor from the filament, just as a clutch in a car disconnects the drive wheels from the engine.

To decide between these options, the researchers attached the filaments to a glass slide, and observed the bacterium. The flagellar motor was powerful enough to turn the entire germ once every five seconds, without EpsE. If EpsE were a brake, then the bacterium would also be unable to turn, like the wheels on a braked car; if it were a clutch, then the bacteria would be free to rotate if powered by another source, like the wheels of a car coasting down a hill on ‘neutral’, powered by gravity. It turned out that the bacteria with the protein present could indeed rotate passively, powered by the random collisions of molecules (Brownian motion6). In other words the filament freewheels.

This molecular clutch, EpsE, is thought to dock on the flagellum’s rotor, a donut-shaped structure at the base of the flagellum. There, EpsE interacts with one of the rotor proteins, called FliG, which changes the rotor’s shape so that it disengages from the engine. Or as described in the perspective:

‘Motile cells are powered by interaction of the FliG protein with the MotA/B complex (which generates torque). The protein EpsE acts as a molecular clutch to disengage the rotary flagellar motor, leaving the flagellum intact but unpowered. This shuts down motility and facilitates biofilm formation.’4

This clutch mechanism is very efficient: it means that the germ needs to make only one protein to halt the powered filament motion, and this takes only 15 minutes. It also preserves the motor intact, so it could reactivate if necessary, rather than needing to be rebuilt from scratch. There also may be an advantage to building biofilms if the filaments were free to rotate in neutral rather than stopped rigidly.4

Design or evolution?

While human engineers solved the problem: ‘How do you temporarily stop a motor once it gets going?’ The Designer of the bacterial flagellum had anticipated that solution with a clutch.

Project leader Daniel Kearns made the obligatory vacuous homage to evolution (cf. these chameleon researchers):

‘We think it’s pretty cool that evolving bacteria and human engineers arrived at a similar solution to the same problem: How do you temporarily stop a motor once it gets going?’2

It would make more sense to say:

‘We think it’s pretty cool that human engineers solved the problem: “How do you temporarily stop a motor once it gets going?” with a clutch, while the Designer of the bacterial flagellum had anticipated that solution.’

Related Articles

Related Media


  1. A good summary is by Howard Berg, a professor of molecular and cellular biology, and of physics, at Harvard University: Motile Behavior of Bacteria, Physics Today, 1999. Return to text.
  2. Microscopic clutch puts flagellum in neutral,, 19 June 2008. Return to text.
  3. Blair, K.M., Turner, L., Winkelman, J.T., Berg, H.C. and Kearns, D.B., A molecular clutch disables flagella in the Bacillus subtilis biofilm, Science 320(5883):1636–1638, 20 June 2008 | DOI: 10.1126/science.1157877. Return to text.
  4. Berry, R.M. and Armitage, J.P., How Bacteria Change Gear: Bacterial motility is arrested when a protein that acts as a clutch disables rotation of the flagellar motor, Science 320(5883):1599–1600, 20 June 2008 (perspective on Ref. 3)| DOI: 10.1126/science.1160444. Return to text.
  5. Biofilms have also helped understand one likely function of the appendix. See Bollinger, R.R., Barbas, A.S., Bush, E.L., Lin, S.S. and Parker, W., Biofilms in the large bowel suggest an apparent function of the human vermiform appendix, J. Theor. Biol. 249(4):826–831, 2007; Wieland, C. And Doyle, S. More musings on our useless appendix, May 2008. Return to text.
  6. One of the discoveries that first put Albert Einstein on the map was the cause of Brownian motion, and proving the reality of atoms (Einstein, A., Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme gefordete Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen (On the movement of small particles suspended in a stationary liquid demanded by the molecular-kinetic theory of heat), Annalen der Physik 322(8):549–560, May 2005. The microscopic motion had been discovered by the botanist Robert Brown in 1827. Return to text.

(Available in Russian)

They say the Bible has been proven wrong by science. Whoever said that hasn’t been to Please give so we can give … information that leads people to Christ our Savior. Support this site

Copied to clipboard
Product added to cart.
Click store to checkout.
In your shopping cart

Remove All Products in Cart
Go to store and Checkout
Go to store
Total price does not include shipping costs. Prices subject to change in accordance with your country’s store.