Share
A- A A+
Free Email News
Frankenstein Foods & Fetuses


US $6.50
View Item
Evolution and the Holocaust


US $13.00
View Item
Evolution's Fatal Fruit
by Tom DeRosa

US $10.00
View Item
Life Before Birth
by Gary E Parker

US $13.00
View Item

Icing the ALS ‘ice bucket’ challenge

by

Published: 6 September 2014 (GMT+10)
Lou-Gehrig

Lou Gehrig (1903–1941): leading baseballer who died only two years after being diagnosed with ALS
Photo: commons.wikimedia.org

In the last month or so, ALS (Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) has been forefront in the news. This is a terrible disease that causes nerve cells in the brain and the spinal cord to degenerate, causing increasing paralysis. Its most famous victim was the baseball player Lou Gehrig (1903–1941), one of the greatest first basemen of all time. This is why ALS is often called ‘Lou Gehrig’s disease’ in North America. Gehrig lived only two years after the diagnosis, and the average survival time is about three years. Another famous victim is the celebrity mathematical physicist and atheopathic propagandist Stephen Hawking (b. 1942). He is unfortunately almost totally paralyzed—confined to a wheelchair and speaking via a voice synthesizer. But he has greatly beaten the odds by living past 70. CMI contributor Rev. Dr Francis Humphrey, former lecturer (retired) in Old Testament Studies in the Faculté de Théologie Évangélique de Montréal, Acadia University, at whose church I had the pleasure of speaking, has suffered from ALS for years, and is an outspoken opponent of assisted suicide.1

This severely destructive illness is one result of the Fall of mankind. But surely Christians, who are meant to imitate Christ (1 Corinthians 11:1), should follow His example of alleviating the effects of the curse by curing diseases and saving lives. So Christians should certainly support efforts to find cures for ALS.

Embryonic stem cell research must necessarily destroy already-conceived human beings, so any moral person must reject this destruction of individuals made in God’s image (Genesis 1:26–28, 9:5–6).

However, this has a qualification: these cures must be ethical. This means that some proposed avenues of research that involve destruction of human beings must be totally resisted.

The ALS Ice Bucket Challenge

wikipedia.org

ALS-ice-bucket-challange

In July and August, videos of people dumping ice water on their heads to raise awareness of ALS have gone viral on social media. This is certainly a less drastic means than the related ‘Polar bear plunge’, where people raise money for charity by submerging themselves in freezing-cold water.

It’s well-meaning but any charity should be worth giving to on its own merits, regardless of someone’s willingness to subject himself to a totally unrelated form of masochism. UK Prime Minister David Cameron and US President Barack Obama seem to agree; they just donated to ALS research.2 However, the campaign has been wildly successful and has created awareness of this debilitating disease. It has attracted many world leaders, businessmen, and famous actors, and some well-known Christians who have participated, and has raised over $100 million.3

Pro-life concerns

However, particularly for Christians who donate, one must then ask exactly how this money will be used. A grave concern is that it will be used to fund the unethical practice of embryonic stem cell research (ESCR). Stem cell research is certainly a very good idea, since stem cells can develop into many types of tissue. Thus they might well be able to grow into neurons to replace those damaged by ALS. However, embryonic stem cell research must necessarily destroy already-conceived human beings, so any moral person must reject this destruction of individuals made in God’s image (Genesis 1:26–28, 9:5–6). The ALS Association has unfortunately supported ESCR. Another type of unethical stem cell comes from the spinal cord from an electively aborted baby. The North East ALS Consortium (NEALS) has openly supported this research.4

Flickr: Doug Wheller

Stephen Hawking: famous ALS sufferer who is now over 70.

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) have emerged in recent years as by far the most significant source of stem cells for ALS research.—ALS Association

However, there are other sources of stem cells that require no destruction of life: ‘adult’ or somatic stem cells. Also, even from a pragmatic perspective—which should always be secondary to morality—unlike embryonic stem cells, somatic stem cells have provided over 70 types of cures. Our Journal of Creation article, Stem cells and Genesis (2001), documents many sources of stem cells and many of these cures. The web version of the article needed to be updated frequently to show all the recent advances in both finding stem cell sources and cures from stem cells. These include alleviating Parkinson’s, tetraplegia, and diabetes; and regrowing corneas and windpipes. We recommend study for much more detail than is possible in this current article.

Suffice it to say, the ALS Association itself admits that adult stem cells are the best way forward:

Where do stem cells come from?

Stem cells occur naturally, or they can be created from other kinds of cells. Stem cells form during development (embryonic stem cells). They are also present in small numbers in many different tissues (endogenous adult stem cells). Most significantly, stem cells can be created from skin cells (induced pluripotent stem cells, or iPS cells).

iPS cells have emerged in recent years as by far the most significant source of stem cells for ALS research. A simple skin biopsy provides the skin cells (“fibroblasts”). These cells are treated in a lab dish with a precise cocktail of naturally occurring growth factors that “turns back the clock,” transforming them back into cells much like those that gave rise to them—stem cells.

This particular charity might be a good one for Christians to support, but only if they reject the unethical ESCR, which has cured nothing; and totally embraced the ethical adult stem cell research that really does lead to cures. Sadly, in some quarters, not necessarily in the ALS association, cures are secondary to finding an excuse to dehumanize unborn babies.

Embryonic stem cells can be isolated from fertilized embryos less than a week old. Before the development of iPS cells, human embryos were the only source of human stem cells for research or therapeutic development. The ethical issues involved hindered development of this research. Most stem cell research in ALS is currently focused on iPS cells, which are not burdened with these issues.5

This is quite an admission that just one source of adult stem cells is much more useful than embryonic stem cells for actual cures. It’s also notable that they referred to ‘ethical’ problems inhibiting research, which is a euphemism for ‘some people objected to killing little people for alleged cures.’ One outright untruth is the claim that until iPS cells were discovered, embryonic stem cells were all that was available—Stem Cells and Genesis documents the large number of alternatives. Embyonic stem cells usage has always been indefensible from both a moral and scientific perspective.

Conclusion—be careful what you support

This particular charity might be a good one for Christians to support, but only if they reject the unethical ESCR, which has cured nothing; and totally embrace the ethical adult stem cell research that really does lead to cures. Sadly, in some quarters, not necessarily in the ALS association, finding cures seems to be secondary to finding an excuse to dehumanize unborn babies. See for example, President Obama okayed funding embryonic stem cell research (but removes adult stem cell funding).

Related Articles

Further Reading

References and notes

  1. Leclair, A., Dying ALS patient and his doctors speak out against assisted suicide, globalnews.ca/, 5 June 2013. Return to text.
  2. See also Crandell, C., Critics throw cold water on the Ice Bucket Challenge, worldmag.com, 21 August 2014. Return to text.
  3. Engel, M., ALS Ice Bucket Challenge tops $100 million as researchers ponder next moves, nydailynews.com, 1 September 2014. Return to text.
  4. A Phase I, Open-label, First-in-human Feasibility and Safety Study of Human Spinal Cord derived Neural Stem Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, alsconsortium.org, accessed 2 September 2014. Return to text.
  5. Stem Cells, alsa.org, accessed 2 September 2014. Return to text.

You are probably accessing this site because you had questions—just like everyone else. That’s why CMI exists. You can help keep the free answers on this site coming. Support this site

Comments closed
Article closed for commenting.
Only available for 14 days from appearance on front page.
Readers’ comments
Brian H., Canada, 8 September 2014

Well stated. Unfortunately most people don’t look deeply into the charities they support. On the surface, research that cures any degenerative neurological disease should be a good thing. I don’t think we should beat people up if they give but haven’t had time or resources to look up these things.

Daniel J., United States, 7 September 2014

"Any charity should be worth giving to on its own merits, regardless of someone’s willingness to subject himself to a totally unrelated form of masochism." I love how you refered to the ice bucket challenge as "masochism," lol

James J., Canada, 6 September 2014

ALS Society in Canada presently does not provide funding for embryonic stem cell research. This could be due only to the fact that Canadian law does not allow it. This of course could change in the future.

John C., United States, 6 September 2014

Dear Israel S,

One reason they push so hard for ESCR is that it encourages and justifies abortion. If they start researching with adult stem cells, they come face to face with the lives they have destroyed for no reason.

Jonathan Sarfati responds

Indeed, as noted at the end of my article.

Israel S., Philippines, 5 September 2014

Only having quickly browsed Stem Cells and Genesis, I was hit with the most amazing fact ever:

"Probably the best source of stem cells is liposuctioned fat, which should not be hard to obtain in the country with the highest rate of obesity in the world".

Combined with the fact that adult stem cell treatments have been shown to be far more effective than embryonic stem cell treatments, there is absolutely NO EXCUSE to further such a murderous cause.

If you need stem cell treatment so badly, just have them take cells from your own body! You won't even need to worry about rejection! I really don't understand the push for embryonic research. In light of this data, use of adult stem cells is a LOT more effective than embryonics, especially considering that experiments hybridizing the two have actually REDUCED the effectiveness of the resulting cell!

One has to wonder WHY they push ESCR when the alternative looks so much more promising.

Paul S., Australia, 5 September 2014

Well said.

Comments closed
Article closed for commenting.
Only available for 14 days from appearance on front page.
Copied to clipboard
9758
Product added to cart.
Click store to checkout.
In your shopping cart

Remove All Products in Cart
Go to store and Checkout
Go to store
Total price does not include shipping costs. Prices subject to change in accordance with your country’s store.