Man isn't infallible? | | | Visit our front page every Wednesday for more technical articles. | As I was reading your "Galazy-Quasar 'Connection' Defies Explanation" article on the fallibility of using red-shifts as distance indicators, I was really excited that the "intelligent" science community is finally realizing that man's word is actually not infallible. I came across a simmilar story in the July 2002 edition of "Popular Mechanics" magazine on pg. 22. The article is titled "Physicists Reconsider Nature's Rule Book." The article states: "New information about subatomic particles from the sun has led scientists to question the Standard Model--the cornerstone of modern physics..." Wow! What a surprise. Man's word isn't 100% right! Keep up the great work AIG! You are such a great ministry!
| They say time is money. Well, this site provides over 30 years of information. That’s a lot of money and time. Would you support our efforts to keep this information coming for 30 more years?  | | |
|
