Missing the mark
How a missionary family gave rise to the top name in ‘apeman’ research
(Louis leakey)!
by Russell Grigg
Most people have heard of anthropologist Louis Leakey, best known as the man who
changed the way that evolutionists think about the place where mankind supposedly
evolved. He did this by finding ape-like fossils in East Africa and declaring them
to be older than those that had been found in Asia, such as Eugene Dubois’
Java Man in Indonesia and Davidson Black’s Peking Man in China. However, most
readers may not know of his once-strong Christian background.
Louis was born in 1903 at Kabete Mission Station, near Nairobi, British East Africa,
now Kenya, where his English parents were missionaries with the Church Missionary
Society. He grew up ‘more African than English’. As a child, he was
fluent in the Kikuyu language as well as in English. He played African children’s
games, built his own three-roomed mud-and-wattle hut, and learned to track animals
and hunt with spear and club. Later he would claim that this training in observation
and patience was the key to his proficiency in finding fossils. He was initiated
into the Kikuyu Tribe as a junior warrior at age 11. The elders gave him the name
Wakuruigi, meaning Son of the Sparrow Hawk, and from then on treated him, as with
the other initiates, like an adult.
At age 13, he made a collection of obsidian (a type of rock1) flakes,
and learned that they included some actual stone axe-heads and arrow-heads. His
biographer says: ‘From that moment Louis became addicted to prehistory.’2
He attended Cambridge University from 1922 and graduated in archaeology and anthropology
in 1926. He received a Ph.D. in 1930, and later various honorary doctorates. He
now abandoned his youthful ambition to follow in his father’s footsteps as
a missionary in East Africa, and from then on devoted his life to attempting to
prove Darwin’s assertion that human evolution began in Africa, not Asia.3
Like father, like son
|
Louis Leakey was featured many times in the popular National Geographic
until his death in 1972. The promotion of his finds made him world-famous, and the
study of human evolution became synonymous with his family’s name. In 1959
he was working in a barren, desert-like area of Africa known as Olduvai Gorge (now
renamed Oldupai Gorge), where he discovered fossil remains he named Homo
habilis. This discovery was promoted by evolutionists as the progenitor
of modern man. This is no longer widely held. Most think that Homo habilis
is not even a valid category.
|
In 1933, in England, Louis met a 20-year-old scientific illustrator named Mary Nicol
and asked her to help with drawings for his first book.4 Their association
developed into an affair, even though he already had one young child, and his wife
of five years was pregnant with another. She divorced him in 1936,5 and
he and Mary were married that same year.
Louis and Mary, who has also made a name for herself in the field of human evolution,
produced three children. Second son Richard, born in Kenya in 1944, is the best
known, as he, too, became a paleontologist and proposed controversial interpretations
of his fossil finds. Richard married in 1966, and then, in 1969, as his father had
done 36 years previously, began an affair with a young scientist, when his wife
had just given birth to their first child.6 The couple divorced, and
a year later Richard married Meave Epps (who was an expert on fossilized monkeys).
Their daughter, Louise, also became a paleontologist. This three-generation dynasty
has been called by evolutionists ‘the first family of paleontology’.
In later years, Richard joined the list of individuals (such as vociferous evolutionary
propagandist and zoologist Richard Dawkins) who endorsed the Humanist Manifesto
2000. In 1984, he had shown his loathing of creationists when he illogically
refused to send any of Kenya’s original hominid fossils to a huge symposium
held that year at the American Museum of Natural History in New York, saying that
‘such an exhibit was too risky in a country where creationists were active’.7
At the same symposium, Mary blasted the museum staff for ‘endangering irreplaceable
fossils by … exhibiting them in a single room where a [religious] fundamentalist
could come in with a bomb and destroy the whole legacy’!7
In 1959, Mary had found a robust skull with huge teeth in deposits that also contained
stone tools. Louis claimed it was a human ancestor and named it Zinjanthropus
(meaning East Africa Man) boisei.8 Because of the size of the
teeth (the same size as that of the much bigger gorilla) and the large sagittal
crest for the attachment of powerful jaw muscles, it was nicknamed Nutcracker Man.
Most other anthropologists thought it was very un-human; however, National Geographic
magazine printed the first of many articles about the Leakeys’ finds9
and sponsored them from then on.
Louis later conceded that Zinjanthropus was not a direct ancestor of modern
man. But he claimed this distinction for other fossils his team discovered in Olduvai
Gorge in 1960–63, naming them Homo habilis (or handy man). He said
they were of a more advanced hominid, one which was definitely on the evolutionary
line to Homo sapiens (modern man). Homo habilis has since been
declared by most evolutionary paleontologists to be an ‘invalid taxon’
(biological category), i.e. a phantom species composed of a ‘waste-bin’
of fossils more correctly assigned to other species.10
Christian influences
Student capers
At Cambridge University from 1922 to 1926, Louis caused quite a stir. He talked
the authorities into allowing him to take Kikuyu as one of his two modern-language
requirements by producing a testimonial to his proficiency in it signed with the
thumb-print of Kikuyu Chief Koinange.1 Then, in lieu of attending lectures
in Kikuyu, of which there were none, he had to coach the university supervisor allotted
to him! This gave rise to the legend that he was ‘the man who examined himself
in Kikuyu’. Before going to Cambridge, Louis had offered his services to the
London School of Oriental Studies to teach Kikuyu in their African Languages section.
When Cambridge University asked the same London organization for two examiners in
Kikuyu, they sent Leakey’s name, not realizing that he was also the student
being examined. The impasse was solved when the supervisor assured the university
that he could learn enough Kikuyu from Louis to be able to examine him in it!2
On another occasion Louis accepted a dare to say grace before dinner in Kikuyu instead
of the customary Latin. He ‘droned sonorously through it without one of the
dons [teachers] noticing’.1
References
- Morell, V., Ancestral Passions, Simon & Schuster, New York, p. 28, 1995.
- Leakey, L.S.B., White African, Hodder and Stoughton, London, pp. 95, 156–57,
1937.
|
As a young man, Louis had planned to make his life’s work that of a missionary.11
In Africa, he had seen the powerfully positive effect of Christianity in an animistic
society. In his autobiography, he tells of two Kikuyu young people, Naomi and Ishmael,
who were both Christians and who wanted to marry. However, their grandfathers had
been enemies and, on his death-bed, Naomi’s grandfather ‘had uttered
a curse to the effect that he would come from the spirit world and give serious
trouble to all his family if they ever allowed any of his descendants to marry into
his enemy’s family.’ Naomi and Ishmael went ahead and married anyway,
and lived happily for many years. Louis commented that ‘the local non-Christian
natives … have decided that Christians can ignore such curses with impunity,
not only to themselves but also to their relations’.12
He also describes the Kikuyu taboo against touching a dead body, which meant that
sick people about to die used to be carried out into the bush to expire there, where
the corpses would be devoured by hyenas and so not need burying. He commented: ‘Naturally
those Kikuyu who have become Christians have abandoned these old ideas and customs,
and they are not in the least afraid of touching a human corpse or a human skull
or skeleton … Christian Kikuyus are thus constantly in demand as undertakers.’13
As a young man Louis had been very zealous about Christianity. At Boscombe (near
Bournemouth), he used to stand on a soap box and preach to passers-by on the streets.
During his time at Cambridge, he sometimes called on his fellow students in their
rooms to ‘tick them off for not being proper Christians’.14
Until 1925 he had always thought that he could be both a missionary and scientist.
So what caused the total change in Louis, not only in his life’s ambition,
but also in his worldview? He tells us in his autobiography: ‘… I had
become firmly convinced of the truth of the theory of Evolution as distinct from
Creation as described in Genesis … .’15
Conclusion
Louis Leakey’s life played out on the world stage a tragedy which is, sadly,
all too common. So often, godly parents fail to see that the ‘science’
teaching that their offspring are imbibing is all within a framework that rejects
Bible history. It is based on a philosophical belief system that rejects direct
divine action. But the Bible’s history is foundational to the gospel. So it
is not surprising that such students usually end up rejecting their childhood belief—especially
those brighter ones who can spot the inconsistencies of putting ‘faith’
and ‘reality’ in two separate boxes.
If only such parents were to arm and equip their family with a biblical worldview,
one which lets them connect the evidence of the real world to the Bible, what a
difference such real science would make!
Louis Leakey died in London on 3 October 1972, aged 69. As with all of us, his choices
were relevant to both his temporal and his eternal destiny. Honoured by the world
which is ‘passing away’, he missed being
‘the man who does the will of God’ and
who ‘lives for ever’ (1
John 2:17).
References
- Known as ‘volcanic glass’, obsidian fragments can break with edges as
sharp as the finest scalpels.
- Cole, S., Leakey’s Luck, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, London, p. 37,
1975.
- Darwin, C., The Descent of Man, John Murray, London, p. 155, 1887.
- Leakey, L.S.B., Adam’s Ancestors, Methuen & Co. Ltd., London
(1934, rewritten 1953). Most of the drawings are of flint-type hand-tools.
- In England in the 1930s, the only sure ground for divorce was adultery.
- Morrel, V., Ancestral Passions, Simon & Schuster Ltd., New York, p.
344, 1995.
- Ref. 6, p. 533.
- It is now called Australopithecus (or Paranthropus) boisei.
- Leakey, L.S.B., Finding the world’s earliest man, National Geographic
118(3):420–435, September 1960.
- See interview with ‘human evolution’ authority Dr Fred Spoor on
CMI’s
video The Image of God.
- Leakey, L.S.B., White African, Hodder and Stoughton, London, p. 68, 1937.
- Ref. 11, pp. 82–83.
- Ref. 11, pp. 186–188.
- Ref. 6, p. 28.
- Ref. 11, p. 161.
(Available in Romanian)
| We support belief in an intelligent designer—the God of the Bible. This site was also ‘intelligently designed’. But rather than six days, it’s taken thousands of days. Help us design more information for this site.  | | |
|