Moon microbes?
Remember the ‘life from Mars’!
by Jonathan Sarfati, CMI–Australia
27 October 2000
Have we found life from the moon? So asks the article
Microorganisms from the Moon: Russian biologists recognize fossils of microorganisms
in lunar soil (27 October 2000). This reports new microscopic analysis of
samples from the lunar surface collected from the then Soviet Union’s Luna
missions in 1970 and 1972. These samples contained spherical particles that are
‘virtually identical to fossils of known biological species’ in size,
shape, distribution and even the way they are deformed during fossilization. The
report claims ‘These fossils are solid evidence for ancient life elsewhere
in space.’ So how should we regard these claims?
-
We should certainly wait until more evidence comes in. Many times, evolutionists
have triumphantly announced ‘proofs’ of evolution or something else
against the Christian worldview, and the secular media uncritically splashed them
over the front page. But later, this evidence has been discredited by further discovery.
We have only to remember Archaeoraptor, pushed as ‘proof’ of
dinosaur-to-bird evolution by the influential National Geographic, but
later exposed as a hoax (see Archaeoraptor hoax update:
National Geographic recants!). More closely related to the moon
life claim is of course the alleged ‘life’ found in the meteorite labeled
ALH84001, supposedly from Mars. This has been discredited on a number of grounds,
but the media and assorted ‘skeptics’ didn’t give the retraction
anywhere near the same publicity. See Life on Mars? Separating
fact from fiction and Mars claims weaken further.
-
One of the many problems with the alleged Mars life was that contamination from
Earth life is almost inevitable. Supposedly this shouldn’t be a problem with
this ‘moon life’ because the samples have been kept in sealed containers
from when they were collected on the moon to their examination in the laboratory.
But they may be underestimating the abilities of microbes to invade containers,
and do we really know how effectively sealed they were during the entire time since
they returned from the moon—almost 30 years?
-
The origin of life from non-living chemicals (called ‘spontaneous generation’,
‘abiogenesis’ or ‘chemical evolution’) is chemically impossible
for many reasons, even under the best conditions (see Q&A:
Origin of Life). But the moon has appalling conditions—waterless,
airless, temperature extremes, and exposure to damaging radiation.
-
Therefore if this report does turn out to be genuine evidence for life on the moon,
this life couldn’t have begun there. Rather, it may be Earth life that was
somehow transported to the moon. After all, the ALH84001 meteorite found its way
to Earth from Mars, so it’s hardly impossible for things to be transported
out of the Earth as well. A violent meteoritic impact could conceivably knock material
out, with a speed exceeding escape velocity. Or spores could be carried so high
up that the solar wind could move them.
-
This is supported by the fact that the moon fossils were ‘virtually identical
to fossils of known biological species’ and had an ‘unmistakable resemblance
to modern spiral filamentous microorganisms like Phormidium frigidum, found
in growing stromatolith [sic] in Shark Bay, Australia’. Evolutionists
frequently use common structures to ‘prove’ a common ancestry (although
a common designer would explain them better), so it’s difficult to believe
that almost identical structures evolved independently on different places with
vastly different environments.
Related article
| Derek C. wrote: “This is an awesome website. As a Christian who’s finally just turning my life over to God (for good), I needed somewhere to look for answers when I had no one to ask.” Help keep the ‘awesome’ going!  | | |
|
