Calendars more than just days and months
Published: 26 June 2014 (GMT+10)
The Moon, tinted red and orange, as seen from Earth during a lunar eclipse.
The Chinese calendar and the Islamic calendar seem strange to those of us who have been brought up in the West.
There is something seemingly strange with New Year coming at the end of January (or a few days before, or a couple of weeks after); or the month of Ramadan falling earlier and earlier each year. One may ask: How are the Muslims supposed to know when to plant their crops? If some date on their calendar is chosen, before very many years it will be completely out of tune with the seasons. The unfamiliar features of the Islamic calendar can be accounted for on the basis that it is a lunar calendar which means a month is very accurately tied to the phases of the moon.
The moon proceeds through its phases in a cycle of about 29.5 days (called the ‘synodic’ month), so having months alternating between 29 and 30 days keeps closely in step with the moon.
A new moon signals a new month and a full moon the middle of the month. This idea is not foreign to our western culture. The Shorter Oxford dictionary notes that the word ‘month’ is derived from the word ‘moon’. The primary definition of month is given as “a measure of time corresponding to the period of revolution of the moon”. So the idea of a lunar month is logical. On the Islamic calendar a sequence of 12 of these lunar months make up a year.
The Chinese calendar is more complicated. It is often popularly referred to as a lunar calendar, but is actually a luni-solar calendar.
It has months which are tied in with the phases of the moon as does the Islamic calendar, but additionally it keeps the year in step with the seasons in the long term by having some years with 13 months. Again that seems strange to us. Surely there should be 12 months in a year?
Is there no certain rule by which calendars ought to be formulated? Some yardstick to provide the various ethnic groups with a basis for designing our calendar? Do we not have some absolute standard that will enable us to say that some calendar features are unacceptable?
In fact, we do have such a yardstick. The Bible sets out God’s provisions:
And God said, “Let there be lights in the expanse of the heavens to separate the day from the night. And let them be for signs and for seasons, and for days and years, and let them be lights in the expanse of the heavens to give light upon the earth.” And it was so. And God made the two great lights—the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night—and the stars. And God set them in the expanse of the heavens to give light on the earth, to rule over the day and over the night, and to separate the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good. And there was evening and there was morning, the fourth day. (Genesis 1:14-19)
So God’s word tells us that He provided the astronomical cycles for us to determine time periods (seasons).
The day-night cycle, caused by the earth’s rotation defines the day for us; the phases of the moon give us the month; and the motion of the stars, moving full circle over about 365 days sets the year for us. And there is no requirement here for there to be 12 months in a year.
No calendar conforms with God’s provision, and it comes as a bit of a shock to realise that the Roman calendar likewise falls short.
That calendar we are all familiar with—that was adopted by the early church and has become the standard world-wide—is deficient. In fact, just as the Islamic calendar is defective because it has a year arbitrarily made up of 12 lunar months, so the Roman calendar is defective because it has a month which is just an arbitrary division of the year into 12.
The Hebrew calendar has been used by the Jewish people for many centuries, and is still in use today. Like the Chinese calendar, it has months alternating (generally) between 29 and 30 days, to keep in step with the lunar month, and also keeps in step with the solar year in the long term. It has a fixed cycle containing seven 13-month years in every 19 years. (See comparison table).
We have seen that the day, the month and the year had their origins in astronomical periods, which God instituted for that purpose. But the week is different. It is not based on any observable astronomical period. The origin of the seven-day week is set out in Genesis when God completed His creation, setting a pattern for His creatures (Genesis 2:2-3 and Exodus 20:11).
It would seem there is no mandate for the year to consist of 12 months. Yet various people groups have gone away with the idea that there should be 12 months in the year. Why?
It is tempting to wonder if originally there were exactly 12 lunar months in a solar year. Perhaps, in the way God set things up in His perfect creation, there were exactly 30 days in a lunar month and exactly 360 days in a solar year. Various people groups could then have a valid cultural memory, handed down from the time before different languages arose at the tower of Babel and people were dispersed.
There are some indications of this mathematically perfect scheme:
- The symbol we use for a degree (an elevated circle) apparently came from the Babylonian mathematicians and is intended to represent the sun. With 360 days in a year, the sun would move exactly one degree per day (Observed by a motion of the stars in one night).
- In Hebrew terminology, a month with only 29 days is called ‘defective’. Normally a month has 30 days.
- The chronology of the global flood in Genesis chapters 6 to 9 seems to allow for 370 days, but the starting and ending dates indicate clearly it was a year plus 10 days (Genesis 7:11-13 says the “fountains of the great deep burst forth, and the windows of the heavens were opened” on 17th day of the second month when Noah was 600 years old, while Genesis 8:13-16 says Noah and his family came out of the ark on the 27th day of the second month in Noah’s 601st year).
However, the idea is hard to substantiate when the physics are considered.
The earth could have increased its speed of rotation to get an extra five-and-a-bit days in a year (for example, through catastrophic plate tectonic movements1 decreasing the moment of inertia of the earth at the time of the Flood), and the moon could have been moved closer to the earth to get an increased number of lunar months in a year, although no particular mechanism has been identified.
Measuring seasons and days and years
All the pointers are there in Genesis—in God’s perfect creation—for humans to order their lives starting with a 24-hour day. God gave us a pattern for working six days and resting on the seventh.
He gave us the stars by which we can even navigate our way around the earth. And He made an orderly universe so that by using the intelligence that comes from the Creator, we can observe, for example, that the earth revolves around the sun once a year. And that the earth also rotates on its axis every 24 hours.2
And, using that knowledge of astronomy, the ancients were able to work out the earth’s position in the universe.
Days, months, years and seasons have always been central to our existence and a calendar a vital tool to keep track of events in our lives. So when you next flick through a calendar—even our flawed one—it should remind you of God’s creative genius and that it was He Who set time and our world in motion in six, literal, 24-hour days, about 6,000 years ago.
Comparison of Calendars
| Ideal Calendar |
|Chinese Calendar||Hebrew Calendar||Islamic Calendar||Roman Calendar|
|Day||Synchronised with the rotation of the earth on its axis||Yes||Yes||Yes||Yes|
|Month||Synchronised with the phases of the moon. New month coinciding with New Moon.||Yes||Yes||Yes|| No
Arbitrary division of the year into 12
|Year||Synchronised with the motion of the earth in its orbit, as shown by the sphere of the stars.|| No
Does not track the commencement of the year accurately
Does not track the commencement of the year accurately
A series of 12 consecutive lunar months
Problems with the Roman Calendar
- The months on our calendar bear no relation to the phases of the moon. This is a serious problem but it is not the only problem.
- Most months (seven) have 31 days and only a minority (five) have 30 days or less. A total of 365 days could be obtained with seven months of 30 days and five months of 31, and six of each in a leap year. Why is the distribution so illogical?
- Four of our months have names in Latin that designate a number: September, October, November and December mean literally 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th. But they fall two months later. Presumably, at one time the year began with March, which would explain why poor old February (coming at the end of the year) just gets whatever days happen to be left over.
The Chinese Calendar
|Equiv. Year||Animal||No. of Days||No. lunar months|
|1986||Tiger||9 Feb 1986 – 28 Jan 1987||354||12|
|1987||Rabbit||29 Jan 1987 – 16 Feb 1988||384||13|
|1988||Dragon||17 Feb 1988 – 5 Feb 1989||355||12|
|1989||Snake||6 Feb 1989 – 26 Jan 1990||354||12|
|1990||Horse||27 Jan 1990 – 14 Feb 1991||384||13|
|1991||Sheep||15 Feb 1991 – 3 Feb 1992||355||12|
|1992||Monkey||4 Feb 1992 – 22 Jan 1993||354||12|
|1993||Rooster||23 Jan 1993 – 9 Feb 1994||383||13|
|1994||Dog||10 Feb 1994 – 30 Jan 1995||355||12|
|1995||Pig||31 Jan 1995 – 18 Feb 1996||384||13|
|1996||Rat||19 Feb 1996 – 7 Feb 1997||355||12|
|1997||Ox||8 Feb 1997 – 27 Jan 1998||353-> 354||12|
|1998||Tiger||28 Jan 1998 – 15 Feb 1999||383-> 384||13|
|1999||Rabbit||16 Feb 1999 – 4 Feb 2000||354||12|
|2000||Dragon||5 Feb 2000 – 23 Jan 2001||354||12|
|2001||Snake||24 Jan 2001 – 11 Feb 2002||383-> 384||13|
|2002||Horse||12 Feb 2002 – 31 Jan 2003||354||12|
|2003||Sheep||1 Feb 2003 – 21 Jan 2004||355||12|
|2004||Monkey||22 Jan 2004 – 8 Feb 2005||383-> 384||13|
| Source: Reid, L., The Complete Book of Chinese Horoscopes, Butler & Tanner Ltd., London, pp.15, 1997.
Note: Numbers of days in each Chinese year, and hence the number of lunar months (last two columns of the above table) have been worked out by the author from the dates given in the reference.
Years are identified by one of 12 animals in a cycle as shown in this table.
Some years contain 13 months (instead of the usual 12) in order to ensure that New Year occurs as close as possible to when the constellations are in a fixed position in the night sky. Months always coincide with the phases of the moon.
Table of workings
This is the author’s calculations for the Chinese calendar from the published dates.
|Rat 1984||29 Feb||2 Feb – 19 Feb||28+306+31+19||384||13 Mth|
|Ox 1985||20 Feb – 8 Feb||9+306+31+8||354|
|Tiger 1986||START||9 Feb – 28 Jan||20+306+28||354|
|Rabbit 1987||29 Jan – 16 Feb||3+28+306+31+16||384||13 Mth|
|Dragon 1988||29 Feb||17 Feb – 5 Feb||13+306+31+5||355|
|Snake 1989||6 Feb – 26 Jan||22+306+26||354|
|Horse 1990||27 Jan – 14 Feb||5+28+306+31+14||384||13 Mth|
|Sheep 1991||15 Feb – 3 Feb||15+306+31+3||355|
|Monkey 1992||29 Feb||4 Feb – 22 Jan||26+306+22||354|
|Rooster 1993||23 Jan – 9 Feb||9+28+306+31+9||383||13 Mth|
|Dog 1994||10 Feb – 30 Jan||19+306+30||355|
|Pig 1995||31 Jan – 18 Feb||1+28+306+31+18||384||13 Mth|
|Rat 1996||29 Feb||19 Feb – 7 Feb||11+306+31+7||355|
|Ox 1997||8 Feb – 27 Jan||21+306+27||354|
|Tiger 1998||28 Jan – 15 Feb||4+28+306+31+15||384||13 Mth|
|Rabbit 1999||16 Feb – 4 Feb||13+306+31+4||354|
|Dragon 2000||29 Feb||5 Feb – 23 Jan||25+306+23||354|
|Snake 2001||24 Jan – 11 Feb||8+28+306+31+11||384||13 Mth|
|Horse 2002||12 Feb – 31 Jan||17+306+31||354|
|Sheep 2003||1 Feb – 21 Jan||28+306+21||355|
|Monkey 2004||29 Feb||22 Jan – 8 Feb||10+29+306+31+8||384||13 Mth|
|Rooster 2005||END||9 Feb – 28 Jan||20+306+28||354|
|Dog 2006||29 Jan – 17 Feb||3+28+306+31+17||385||13 Mth|
|Pig 2007||18 Feb – 6 Feb||11+306+31+6||354|
| Total days in March through December is always 306.|
As a check I looked at the 19 years from 9 February 1986 to 8 February 2004.
This is exactly 19 years on the Gregorian calendar, consisting of 6940 days.
It contains five leap year days. (365 x 19 + 5)
Adding up the days in this table for the Chinese calendar also gave 6940 days.
References and notes
- Baumgardner, J., Catastrophic plate tectonics: the geophysical context of the Genesis Flood, creation.com/cpt-flood. Return to text.
- DeYoung, D. B., Astronomy and the bible. Return to text.
Liked your article!
Just a small point......
In the article you stated 'the day, the month and the year had their origins in astronomical periods, which God instituted for that purpose'.
However, Genesis 1 states that the lights should be signs for 'Days and Years' (and seasons) but months is not mentioned there.
You suggest that seasons are mentioned in the Genesis passage but not months. I disagree. Seasons there doesn’t mean what we think of as seasons. You don’t need any astronomical information to determine our seasons. In the Genesis passage, I take it to mean any fixed time period including the month.
The reason we now start our year in January is actually quite strange. As mentioned in this article the Roman year did indeed start in March. However as the Roman empire grew and provinces became more widespread it was found by the time the army commanders, or consuls, for the year were elected, which was done at the beginning of the year, and marched their troops (thus the reason this month was called march) to their campaigning fields the campaigning season (and also the good weather) was half over. The solution was to make the beginning of the year, and hence the consul elections, 2 months earlier at the beginning of the month of the god Janus. That meant by the time the consul arrived in his province it was the beginning of spring and the campaign season. This then being incorporated into the Julian calendar and later the Gregorian calender, it is by such a quirk of history that we celebrate the time of our new year.
It is apparent that Solomon observed 12 months in the year.
See 1 Kings 4:7 and 1 Chronicles 27:1-15
You make the observation that Solomon observed a 12 month year. I don’t know how long ago the Hebrew calendar was set up, but it would be valuable to find out. Anyway, any year under the Hebrew calendar would have some years of 12 months.
I loved the passage about Noah's flood and how it allows for 370 days, which are then seen as 1 year + 10 days. Thus pointing to a year of 360 days.
There is more in Scriptures to support the idea that the pre-flood/original earth had a year made of 360 days exactly, which would seem to be the supposed ideal length the Lord meant for the year.
This extra info in Scriptures comes from the study of the Great Tribulation across Old and New Testament.
«About 125 years ago Sir Robert Anderson unlocked the secret of Daniel’s 70 weeks when he teamed up with the London Royal Observatory to discover that prophetic years are 360 days in length and consist of 12 months of 30 days each. This is also the only way you can make the three measures of the Great Tribulation (1260 days, 42 months, or 3 1/2 years) come out the same. Therefore the 70 weeks of Daniel consist of 490 years of 360 days each. He published this discovery in a book called The Coming Prince, a commentary on Daniel’s 70th Week.» (via Jack Kelley of GraceThruFaith)
You seem to have claimed that the Hebrew Calender is not the ideal calender because it "does not track the commencement of the year accurately." However, the inherent beauty of the Hebrew Calender is that it is tied to agricultural cycles. In the first Hebrew month (March-April) a firstfruit offering of barley was commanded by God to be presented before Him. Likewise, in the third month (May-June) a firstfruit offering of the wheat harvest was to be brought before the LORD in the form of two loaves of bread which requires that the wheat harvest be ready before then. Yet we know that some winters linger and others end rather short. The Hebrew calender would add a thirteenth month if the winter was prolonged and if the barley harvest would not be ready in time. It is of more practical value for the year to be tied to agricultural cycles than for something abstractly beautiful as a "celestial" year. At any rate, in most cases by far, the first Hebrew month coincides with the new moon closest to the spring equinox. Maybe that fact satisfies your "ideal-ness" requirement for the Hebrew Calendar that it should also be celestially synchronized by the year.
I tend to agree with your suggestion that the Hebrew calendar does fulfil God’s requirement. The article as I originally submitted it said so. While it is true that neither the Hebrew calendar nor the Chinese calendar start the year where the year actually starts (they are a number of days out), they do the best that is possible, giving all the astronomical periods their full weight. By the same token, the Roman calendar isn’t right either. It is out by a number of hours. Perhaps I should have provided some statistics as to how far they are out on average, rather than just saying right or wrong.
It seems that Enoch knew something about calendars also- the length of his life- when "he decided" to leave this earth probably wasn't a random number. (?)
I ran across a website that gives an interesting discussion of a 360-day calendar that has twelve 30-day months, and the insertion of a leap-month every 6 years (with a 4-year period instead every 40 years). Do a web search for 360-day calendar for more information. This calendar claims to fit with the prophecies of Daniel 12:11-12; Revelation 11:3; 12:6; etc., and is extremely accurate over thousands of years using a relatively simple algorithm for when to insert leap months.
You, together with Vincenzo R. above, provide evidence that God originally created the astronomical cycles so that the year consisted of exactly 360 days. I like the idea, and will follow up on the facts you provide. However, there is a problem with how things change as I said in the article.
Yes. The Roman year did originally start in March. According to Plutarch, it was Numa Pompilius, the second king of Rome and successor to Romulus, who reformed the calendar and prefixed the two months of January and February at the beginning of the year.
It's nice to see that comments can be made on your articles...thanks!
Is this possible on all your articles,as I haven't noticed this before?
It would be great to ask questions on some of your creation discussions, but I find the blog or newsroom type approaches too slow and never answer my questions in particular.....like for instance, what's your answer for how kangaroos got to
I like Dante's comment about the logic and order of the Hebrew calendar.
These two books are very helpful in explaining the origins of the Western calendar:
Calendar: Humanity's Epic Struggle to Determine a True and Accurate Year by David Ewing Duncan
Marking Time: The Epic Quest to Invent the Perfect Calendar by Duncan Steel
They claim that the Egyptians were the first ancients to recognize that the solar year is 365 days. Julius Caesar was enamored not only of Cleopatra but of her nation's calendar which he adopted to replace the older Roman lunar system.
A purely solar calendar makes sense for agricultural nations such as in Europe and North America. A purely lunar calendar makes sense for Arabic nations scorching under the desert sun. Each system has its virtues and I think it is best to recognize and honor humanity's collective wisdom.
I think your article would have been improved by demonstrating how difficult it was to determine that a solar year is 365 days. This is what the two above books do.
You, together with Lachlan W. and Seathrun M. above, give accounts of Roman history as to how the Roman calendar was modified. You may well be right. I am more into mathematics in this article rather than history. And I am suspicious particularly of Roman history because they had a tendency to rewrite their history with every change in the political sphere.
Great article. For a possible explanation of the 360 day year, check out The Mars-Earth Wars by Donald Patten and Samuel Windsor
If nothing else, the math is interesting.