Share
A- A A+

Article from:

Creation  Volume 34Issue 3 Cover

Creation 34(3):20–22
July 2012

Free Email News
The Great Turning Point
by Dr Terry Mortenson

US $15.00
View Item
Evolution's Fatal Fruit
by Tom De Rosa

US $10.00
View Item
Creation Without Compromise
by Donald D. Crowe

US $10.00
View Item
The Dark Side of Charles Darwin
by Jerry Bergman

US $14.00
View Item
Evolution and the Holocaust DVD
by Dr Jonathan Sarfati

US $13.00
View Item
Evolution’s Fatal Fruit DVD
by Tom De Rosa

US $13.00
View Item

Roots and fruits

by

One way of discovering the true nature of a theory is to study its ‘roots and fruits’— that is, its origins and consequences. We shall see in this article that evolution’s origins are anti-Christian and anti-biblical, and its consequences appear to be uniformly evil. There are several reasons why Christians should oppose the theory of evolution, and these are just two of them.

roots-fruits

© iStockPhoto.com/NikolajSchouboe

Roots

The idea of evolution is actually very old. The pagan Greeks, for example, wrote about it some 2,700 years ago. But the modern theory, together with the present-day concept of vast periods of time, has its roots in the anti-Christian ‘Enlightenment’ of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. (The same is true of liberal theology.) Many of the pioneers of these ideas were deists. Deists do not believe in divine revelation; so they do not believe that the Bible is the Word of God. Their ‘god’ is very different from the God of the Bible. He/it is a remote being who started the universe, but left it to run itself, operating according to natural laws.1

Thus the roots of these ideas (of vast ages and evolution) are clearly anti-biblical and anti-Christian.

Various theories were put forward, resulting eventually in the full-blown long ages, anti-Flood geology of Charles Lyell (1797–1875) and then the theory of evolution of Charles Darwin (1809–1882). Lyell was a deist who wanted to “free the science [geology] from Moses”.2 He was greatly influenced by another deist, James Hutton (1726–1797). Hutton proposed a radical uniformitarianism in which he insisted that only present-day processes at present-day frequencies and magnitudes should be used to interpret the rock record—and Lyell developed this idea further.3

Darwin studied theology for a time, but he turned against Christianity and became a deist or possibly an agnostic.4 He was much influenced by Charles Lyell, and by his own grandfather, Erasmus Darwin (1731–1802), who was an anti-Christian deist and evolutionist.

Charles Darwin’s theory did not arise primarily out of his scientific observations. He accepted the deistic, uniformitarian worldview of his friend and mentor, Charles Lyell, and then he interpreted the data in accordance with that worldview.5

Thus the roots of these ideas (of vast ages and evolution) are clearly anti-biblical and anti-Christian.

Fruits

What about the fruits of these ideas? The list of evil fruits seems almost endless. They catalogue untold misery and suffering. Whole nations and societies—countless millions of people—have been affected for evil. Science itself has been corrupted and its progress hindered.6

© iStockPhoto.com/lonescuBogdanCristian

Rotten-apple

The theory of evolution (with the billions of years that it requires) is the foundational belief of secular humanism (atheism). It enables humanists to deny the existence of God and their accountability to Him. It means that they can create their own standard of morality and do “what is right in their own eyes” (cf. Judges 21:25).

Nations and societies which adopt this evolutionary philosophy see a breakdown of family life, broken homes, sexual immorality, lack of respect for the sanctity of human life (including that of the unborn child) and increasing crime. The theory of evolution is foundational to the doctrines of Marxism and Nazism, which produced the cold-blooded murder of millions. These murders include 77 million in Communist China, 62 million in the Soviet Gulag State, 2 million in the Khmer Rouge killing fields and 21 million non-battle killings by the Nazis.7

It is the basis of the most appalling practices of eugenics (the ‘science’ of ensuring superior human populations). This included Hitler’s killing of many disabled people, and the forced sterilization of hundreds of thousands, including many thousands in the USA.8

It has also fuelled racism of various kinds, involving the ruthless elimination of those regarded as inferior.9 Australian aboriginals, for example, were slaughtered because they were considered to be subhuman.10

The theory of evolution has also contributed to the loss of faith or lack of faith of millions. Witness the millions of atheists and agnostics in countries that used to be ‘Christian’, but have been or are dominated by communism or secular humanism. There are countless stories of individuals brought up in Christian homes who say they lost their faith through evolutionary teaching.

Another fruit of the ideas of vast ages and evolution is the tendency to slide into ‘liberal’ theology. This entails dismissing Genesis as history, which undermines the very notion of salvation in Jesus Christ, “the last Adam”.

Christian responses

Many Christians share my view that the theory of evolution, together with its billions of years, is actually a satanic deception. Jesus said,

“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Therefore by their fruits you will know them.” (Matthew 7:15–20)
The ‘roots and fruits’ of the theory of evolution indicate very clearly that it is a satanic deception.

The fruits borne by the theory of evolution are uniformly bad, but the fruits borne by believing the biblical account, consistently applied, are uniformly good. Belief in the biblical account has effects which are the exact opposite of those caused by belief in evolution. For example, it discourages racism. According to the Bible, all human beings are closely related, being descended from Adam via Noah, who lived less than five thousand years ago.11 It also encourages the advance of science, because it accepts that the whole creation has been wonderfully designed by a rational God.12

But what about Christians who accept the theory of evolution and/or billions of years, and try to reconcile them with Scripture? One clergyman who is a theistic evolutionist said to me, “Darwin did not know that Hitler and Stalin would use the theory of evolution to justify their actions”. It is true that Lyell and Darwin did not foresee the full consequences of their theories, but they could have guessed. After all, the full title of Darwin’s book is On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, and in The Descent of Man, he wrote:

“At some future period … the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races. At the same time the anthropomorphous [having or suggesting human form and appearance] apes … will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.”13,14

The important thing to understand is that Lyell and Darwin were deliberately seeking to exclude God from science, and they knew very well that their theories would destroy belief in the Bible, the God of the Bible and the morality rooted in the Bible.15

Red-apples

© iStockPhoto.com/MarekMnich

Some Christians say that Darwin’s theory cannot be hostile to Christianity, because he mentioned the Creator in his book. However, this concept is totally foreign to the entire ethos of the Origin, so the mentions would appear to have been “a sop to mollify the Christian community”.16 E.g. Darwin added his famous words ‘by the Creator’ (in the last sentence of the book) to the 2nd (1860) and later editions of Origin. But privately, in a letter to Joseph Hooker, dated March 1863, he wrote, “ … I have long regretted that I truckled to public opinion & used the Pentateuchal term of creation, by which I really meant ‘appeared’ by some wholly unknown process.”17 As mentioned, Darwin himself was anti-Christian, and to the extent that his thinking may have included a deistic ‘God’, it was not the God of Christianity.

Another very common response is to say that evolution is simply a biological process, and the Nazis, Marxists and others misused the theory to justify their actions. There is nothing wrong, such Christians say, with the process itself. But this argument is illogical and unbiblical. The theory’s evil fruits are bound up in its very nature. If God created by means of evolution, it means that He used a process of millions of years of death, disease, violence, suffering and waste. And it involves the ruthless elimination of the weak by the strong. If God used such methods, why shouldn’t we? In fact, Nazis and Marxists thought that they were just emulating nature in their ruthlessness. Adolf Eichmann, the Nazi war criminal who masterminded the deaths of millions, was saturated in evolutionary thinking, and believed that his actions were not merely defensible—they were commendable. He was cooperating with nature, improving the human race.18

Actually, the scientific evidence against microbes-to-man evolution is so powerful that the theory of evolution has no right to be called a ‘theory’. Scientists normally use this word to mean a well-substantiated explanation of the data. An example is Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. The theory of evolution is really just a hypothesis based on a naturalistic worldview and a naturalistic definition of science—the arbitrary assumption that everything can and must be explained without reference to God and the supernatural.

The ‘roots and fruits’ of the theory of evolution indicate very clearly that it is a satanic deception. The Bible’s teaching supports this conclusion, as do the real facts of science. A further indication is the fact that ‘the world’ seems to have a special hatred for biblical creation. It does everything in its power to exclude and suppress it, and to impose the evolutionary worldview. Some Christians may believe in evolution and/or millions of years, but that does not change the unpleasant facts described in this article, nor the implications of those facts.

Related Articles

Further Reading

References and notes

  1. Mortenson, T., The Great Turning Point, Master Books, Green Forest, 2004, pp. 24–25. Return to text.
  2. Catchpoole, D. and Walker, T., Charles Lyell’s hidden agenda—to free science “from Moses”; creation.com/lyell; August 2009. Return to text.
  3. Mortenson, T., Ref. 1, pp. 25–33. Return to text.
  4. Brentnall, J. and Grigg, R., Darwin’s slippery slide into unbelief, Creation 18(1):34–37, 1995; creation.com/darwinslide. Return to text.
  5. Statham, D., Darwin, Lyell and the Origin of Species, J. Creation 24(1):65–71, 2010. Return to text.
  6. Bergman, J., Textbook tyranny, Creation 24(2):56, 2002; creation.com/textbook-tyranny. Return to text.
  7. Rummel, R.J., Death by Government, New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 1994, Hall, R., Darwin’s impact—the bloodstained legacy of evolution, Creation 27(2):46–47, 2005; creation.com/darwinimpact. Return to text.
  8. Grigg, R., Eugenics … death of the defenceless, Creation 28(1):18–22, 2005; creation.com/eugenics. Return to text.
  9. Racism Q&A; creation.com/racism-questions-and-answers. Return to text.
  10. Wieland, C., Darwin’s bodysnatchers: new horrors, Creation 14(2):16–18, 1992; creation.com/bodysnatch. Return to text.
  11. Batten, D., et al., Creation Answers Book, Chapter 18: How did all the different races arise (from Noah s family)? creation.com/cab18. Return to text.
  12. Sarfati, J., The biblical roots of modern science; creation.com/roots. Return to text.
  13. Darwin, C., Descent of Man, 1871, Vol. 1, p. 201, Darwinonline.org.uk. Return to text.
  14. See also Bergman, J., The Dark Side of Charles Darwin, Master Books, Green Forest, 2011, pp. 211–232. Return to text.
  15. Grigg, R., Darwin’s mystery illness, Creation 17(4):28–30, 1995; creation.com/illness. Return to text.
  16. Taylor, I., In the Minds of Men, TFE Publishing, Toronto, 1984, p. 463, n.9. See Footnote 11 in Grigg, R., Charles Darwin’s mystery illness (Footnote 15 above). Return to text.
  17. Bergman, ref. 14, pp. 67–68. Also see creation.com/darwin-divine-design. Return to text.
  18. Grigg, R., The trial and death of Adolf Eichmann; creation.com/eichmann. Return to text.

God did it in six days and rested on the seventh. A good model to follow as individuals but corporately, CMI provides new articles 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year. Will you consider a small gift to support this site? Support this site

Comments closed
Article closed for commenting.
Only available for 14 days from appearance on front page.
Readers’ comments
John L., Australia, 12 October 2013

False prophets circulate today as never before, and we tolerate them by saying, "well, everyone's entitled to their point of view." Jesus word is clear, "Beware of them!" If only we obeyed Him and ceased this devilish "tolerance"! Evolution is anti-Scriptural and therefore wrong, let's say it clearly, and be prepared for the persecution that will follow. This article is both clear and instructive.

S. H., United Kingdom, 12 October 2013

One only needs to look at Jesus weeping at the tomb of Lazarus. Most translations of John 11:33 have "he was deeply moved in his spirit" (or similar). According to Strong's concordance "deeply moved" (Greek embrimaomai) is derived from the word brimaomai - "to snort with anger". Indeed, the New Living translation has "a deep anger welled up within him", whilst the English Jubilee 2000 translation has "he became enraged in the Spirit". This is entirely to be expected when the source of life is confronted by "the last enemy", death.

Indeed, in John 10:10 Jesus contrasted Himself ("I have come that they may have LIFE, and that they may have it more abundantly") with our adversary ("the thief does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy"). Jesus brings life, our enemy brings death.

God has life in Himself and is the life-giver. Death, far from being "part of life", is a grotesque alien intruder which stands against all that God purposes and which will be done away with.

To suggest that "God used evolution" (which relies on death to work) or "evolution is compatible with the Christian faith" is to say that God has acted contrary to His very nature as the life-giver. That is a very serious allegation.

Kobus V., South Africa, 12 October 2013

Nice article.

It remains a mystery that some professing Christians still need to find excuses, or fallacies, for seeking something inherently truthful in evolutionary thinking.

All known efforts for allowing evolution from a Biblical perspective have failed miserably. The evidence of a Biblical rejection of evolution is overwhelming.

Evolutionary thinking in and of itself is self refuting. The assumption that the present (what is observed and tested today) is the key (on how to observe and test) to the past refutes evolution. No evolution can be observed at any level today, not in any of the sciences.

Most professing the “scientific proof” of evolution would have a strawman argument about what they themselves believe is the evidence for evolution, which is illogical and anti-scientific. Extrapolating from adaptation, a conclusion supporting something more than adaptation, is non-scientific and logically flawed.

Your conclusion that evolution is a satanic deception is fully supported.

Evolutionary thinking has wide and deceiving influences on all aspects of human life, and is anti-Christian.

R. D., United Kingdom, 12 October 2013

I have for a while now refused to call evolution a "theory", never mind a "scientific theory". I use the term "naturalistic historical hypothesis" - this puts it in its place perfectly.

Also, this article is very good in that (unlike many) it traces the roots to the real point of relevance - that is, the grotesquely-misnamed "Enlightenment" (again, I refuse to use this term, I prefer "Endarkenment"). The "Enlightenment" philosophers made no secret of their hostility towards the Bible and Christianity and their a priori rejection of miracles, and thus it's no surprise that Liberal theology, belief in vast ages past and belief in common descent of all life (all of which are attributable ultimately to miracle-denial) all became popular as a result of it. None of them are new ideas, nor do they have anything to do with the development of the scientific method (first proposed a good 150-200 years before the "Enlightenment") or any increase in human knowledge; they just gained a currency which they'd rarely if ever had before in popular thinking.

If more people were aware of this, there'd be far less compromise out there. Keep spreading the word, and the compromise will keep being eroded!

Dennis G., Australia, 12 October 2013

Romans 1:26 onwards describe the potential process well!

Stephen P., United States, 12 October 2013

wow, this is enlightening!!

George H., Canada, 12 October 2013

One could go on about the fruit of evolutionary thinking, but one aspect that is often overlooked is the economic troubles we experience today. We see injustices and corruption increasing as result of greed unchecked by a Christian world-view. Workers are taken advantage of in the name of profits while the elite make obscene incomes.

Socialism tried to answer injustice in society but is unsuccessful due to its un-biblical roots and goals, but unrestrained capitalism is no better.

Jay M., United Kingdom, 12 October 2013

On the topic of good trees and good fruits, some people might respond with something like "well atheists can still do good things too, and they're not motivated by God, how do you explain them?" Unfortunately, I can't explain "good" atheists. I was wondering if you could assist me?

Don Batten responds

Atheists don't live in a vacuum; they live in societies where they have learned morals. Ultimately those moral standards come from God, like it or not. Christians, as salt and light in societies help to provide a moral compass. I have known atheists who were motivated to be moral just to try to show up the Christians in their circle. However, atheists are not 'good' (nor is anyone). All break the two most important commandments, as Jesus summarized it in Matthew 22:37-40. Psalm 14 is relevant.

Benjamin W., United States, 13 October 2013

I believe it was St. Augustine who said, "Never judge a philosophy by its abuse." I would extend that same courtesy to scientific theories. We must not forget that Scripture and Christian teaching have been used as the basis for terrible atrocities. Do we throw out the baby of Christianity with the bathwater of the the KKK or Salem Witch Trials? Of course not. We recognize that one need not lead to the other. Evolution is the same way.

Furthermore, it is a genetic fallacy that is being committed in this article. By attacking the alleged sources of evolutionary thought, the validity of evolution itself isn't really being attacked. "Bad" people have good ideas all the time.

The real weakness of this article is, in my estimation, its documentation. Are there no outside sources available to substantiate the claims made here? Or is creation.com only able to supply its own biased view without referencing those who would disagree?

Christians need not fear evolution. I highly recommend the resources at BioLogos that help clarify the relationship between biblical Christianity and the theory of evolution.

Don Batten responds

I believe it was St. Augustine who said, "Never judge a philosophy by its abuse." I would extend that same courtesy to scientific theories.

CMI: You don’t seem to have read the article very carefully. The article traces the roots of the idea and the consequences. Ravi Zacharias has said that we can judge a world-view by the hearts of those who promote it and it is clear that evolution had its roots in those who hated God as Creator and Redeemer. The consequences are also not inconsequential; they are a product of the idea, not an abuse of it. Eugenics, for example, was a Darwin family business. Darwin himself promoted the basic ideas. Hitler was just applying Darwinism to politics.

We must not forget that Scripture and Christian teaching have been used as the basis for terrible atrocities. Do we throw out the baby of Christianity with the bathwater of the the KKK or Salem Witch Trials? Of course not. We recognize that one need not lead to the other. Evolution is the same way.

CMI: KKK Christian? Scriptural? Hardly! Its founder, David Duke, abandoned the Bible’s teaching on origins and imbibed evolutionary notions of origins, within which his racism was able to flourish. (So, ironically, the KKK is yet another fruit of evolution!).

CMI: "Scripture and Christian teaching … the basis for" the Salem witch trials? This is also incorrect. It was ignorance of the Bible’s teaching that led to these. It was the biblical teaching of an out-of-town Puritan pastor that eventually stopped the horrors in the civil court. He pointed out that none of the 'evidence' being put forward met biblical criteria.

Furthermore, it is a genetic fallacy that is being committed in this article. By attacking the alleged sources of evolutionary thought, the validity of evolution itself isn't really being attacked. "Bad" people have good ideas all the time.

CMI: see above. If the intent of the originators and promoters was evil, then the worldview is legitimately criticized on that basis. And when its consequences are as its originators and promoters intended (the weakening of Christianity), then it is hardly the genetic fallacy. Futhermore, this article is in the context of creation.com that provides abundant evidence against "evolution itself"; see Created or evolved? for example, but there are many hundreds of other articles dealing with evolution in virtually every aspect (there are over 8,000 articles on creation.com).

The real weakness of this article is, in my estimation, its documentation. Are there no outside sources available to substantiate the claims made here? Or is creation.com only able to supply its own biased view without referencing those who would disagree?

CMI: Ironically, this sounds like the genetic fallacy. ‘I won’t take any notice of what you say, because you are biased’? You have to do better than that and actually engage with the articles and show where they are wrong. You have not even done this with this article, Roots and Fruits. If you care to actually read the referenced articles, you will find that they cite many external sources.

Christians need not fear evolution. I highly recommend the resources at BioLogos that help clarify the relationship between biblical Christianity and the theory of evolution.

CMI: I hope you are ignorant of the dreadful consequences of Biologos’ promotion of compromise with the atheists' creation myth, which undermines virtually all major doctrines of the Bible. If you are aware of these consequences, then your recommendation is evil. If you are not aware of these, I suggest you read some critiques of Biologos' position, such as "It's not Christianity!" and 'related reading' at the end of the article. And I wonder how many references Biologos give to the critiques of their teaching? And how unbiased are they? Or perhaps people you agree with are unbiased whereas people you disagree with are biased? :-) Please think about these things; everything is at stake.

Pat G., United States, 19 October 2013

We have terms for this in our household. Evolution is "doctrine" and it is a religion. You can't BELIEVE in a theory or a hypothesis. You can only BELIEVE in a religious teaching. It is telling that people always ask, "do you BELIEVE in the theory of evolution?"

Don Batten responds

Indeed so. Evolution is a religious belief, as the philosopher Michael Ruse said.

Comments closed
Article closed for commenting.
Only available for 14 days from appearance on front page.
Copied to clipboard
7218
Product added to cart.
Click store to checkout.
In your shopping cart

Remove All Products in Cart
Go to store and Checkout
Go to store
Total price does not include shipping costs. Prices subject to change in accordance with your country’s store.