Share
A- A A+
Free Email News
Creation magazine print - 1 yr new subn


US $25.00
View Item
The Creation Answers Book
by Various

US $9.00
View Item

So, you’re doing a report on Creation vs Evolution …

Every school year, students wanting to do a paper on ‘Creation vs. Evolution’ contact our ministry for our advice and insights. In reply, we share the following points with our studious enquirers.

General advice in writing your paper

  • If you are assigned a specific topic, please be sure to stick to the topic given. For example, if your set topic is ‘antibiotics’, then it is worth explaining antibiotic resistance and why this is not an example of particles-to-people evolution because no new information is ever generated. But it would not be appropriate to discuss religion vs. science or the age of the earth in such an essay. Or, in a report about rock formations, it is perfectly appropriate to discuss evidence of catastrophic formation of the rocks, but not the evolutionary basis of Nazism.
  • If you have not been assigned a specific topic, please be aware of the following. Because the ‘Creation vs. Evolution’ issue covers a wide range of areas, it is too broad to be dealt with adequately in one paper. Therefore, we suggest choosing one aspect of this debate to focus on—particularly, an area you may find interesting.
  • Do not say ‘evolution is just a theory’. While you probably mean ‘evolution is unproven’, the problem with calling evolution ‘a theory’ is that scientists use the word differently from laymen. A ‘theory’ in science means a well-substantiated explanation of data. The evolution conjecture should not be called a ‘theory’, because this gives it unwarranted respectability by association with the Theory of Relativity, Newton’s Theory of Gravity, the Debye–Hückel theory of electrolytes, etc. All these theories have strong experimental support (although Newton’s theory has been augmented by Einstein’s). In contrast, evolution of life from non-living matter and from one basic type of organism to a different type has not the slightest experimental/observational support.
  • In certain essays, you may be expected to write about what you’ve been taught during the class. Also with examinations, you are being tested on your knowledge of the course. Please be aware that these are not appropriate times to ‘preach’. For example, if you are asked ‘how old is the Earth?’, then the (correct!) answer of ~6000 years will almost certainly be marked wrong, because the course would have said ~4.5 billion years. So you don’t have to lie, we recommend prefixing your answer with: ‘Most scientists believe that …’ or ‘The general consensus among geochronologists is …’. Remember, an exam is not a test of your personal beliefs. Rather, it is a test of how well you have learnt and understood the course as taught.

  • Try to anticipate possible ‘come-backs’. E.g. if you say: ‘There are no transitional forms’, then your teacher may downgrade you and say: ‘Haven’t you heard of Archaeopteryx and Lucy?’ While these examples are not convincing when looked at in depth, it would still be better to say: ‘While Darwin predicted that the fossil record would show numerous transitional fossils, even 150 years later, all we have are a handful of disputable examples.’

Or if you say: ‘There are no beneficial mutations’, your teacher may suggest, however inappropriately, sickle-cell anaemia or wingless beetles as examples of mutations that can be beneficial to the organism. It would be better to say: ‘Mutations have been observed to destroy, delete or corrupt genetic information or to be neutral, but have not been observed to add the sort of information needed for microbes-to-mankind evolution. This is true of ‘beneficial’ mutations like shrivelled-eyed cave fish or flightless beetles on windswept islands, where the changes still involve loss of sight or flight. However particles to people evolution requires so many information-increasing mutations, that it should be easy to find such mutations happening today, and yet we are hard-pressed to find any.’ (See also Arguments Creationists Should Not Use.)

Some proposed points of discussion are:

Creation vs. Evolution

Is this really an issue of religion vs. science, or is it the historical science of one religion vs the historical science of another religion? What are the philosophical presuppositions of each side?

Recommended resources:

Information Theory

What is it and what are its implications for the creation/evolution issue?

Recommended resources:

Created or Evolved?

Is there evidence of design in the world?

Recommended resources:

What are the logical implications of adopting an evolutionary worldview?

Recommended resources:

Is there evidence for a young Earth and Universe?

Recommended resources:

Can life really come from non-life as (chemical) evolution suggests?

Recommended resources:

What about neo-Darwinism (mutations plus natural selection)?

Can it explain the increased genetic information required for microbe-to-man evolution?

Recommended resources:

What about the so-called ‘evidence’ for evolution?

Recommended resources:

The Scopes Trial

What is the lesson to be learned?

(Read this testimony of a student who used this material on the Scopes Trial.)

Recommended resources:


We support belief in an intelligent designer—the God of the Bible. This site was also ‘intelligently designed’. But rather than six days, it’s taken thousands of days. Help us design more information for this site. Support this site

Copied to clipboard
4204
Product added to cart.
Click store to checkout.
In your shopping cart

Remove All Products in Cart
Go to store and Checkout
Go to store
Total price does not include shipping costs. Prices subject to change in accordance with your country’s store.