Share
A- A A+

Article from:

Creation  Volume 32Issue 1 Cover

Creation 32(1):53–55
January 2010

Free Email News
15 Reasons to Take Genesis as History
by Dr Don Batten, Dr Jonathan D Sarfati

US $3.50
View Item
Bones of Contention (Revised and Updated)


US $28.00
View Item
The Creation Answers Book
by Various

US $9.00
View Item
Genetic Entropy and the Mystery of the Genome
by Dr J.C Sanford

US $17.00
View Item

Is man a spiritualized hominid?

by

Is man a spiritualized hominid?

Did man arise from a body evolved from an ape, which God spiritualized, or did God create man as a spiritual creature from the beginning?
Credit: © iStockphoto/boriail

When Christians try to reconcile the Bible with evolution and its billions of years of deep time, they usually propose something along the following lines: A population of creatures called “hominids” came into existence by means of evolution. In their final form, these creatures were identical to humans, except that they did not have spirits. But then God implanted spirits—either into just two of them (Adam and Eve), or into many—and we are the descendents of those “upgraded hominids”.

This bizarre scenario contradicts the clear teaching of Scripture1 and the real facts of science.2 In this article, however, I will confine myself to pointing out just two flaws in the theory.

First, the abilities and faculties of the human body and mind are vastly superior to those needed for survival and reproduction. For that reason (as well as many other reasons) their existence cannot be accounted for by evolution.3

Second, the abilities and faculties of the human body and mind are so clearly designed for a spiritual purpose, that their supposed existence without the spirit (for hundreds of thousands of years in various hominids) makes very little sense.

Here are some of the special abilities and faculties of the human body and mind:

The body

Upright posture. Unlike the apes, and all other mammals, man has a fully upright posture.4 This is completely unnecessary for survival and reproduction; but it is, I suggest, very appropriate for a being who was “made in the image of God”, and was given dominion over the whole world.

First, it allows him to make full use of his hands in very special ways (see below). And second, it confers on him a special kind of dignity.

‘The human hand is one of the most precise and wonderful mechanical devices in creation and vastly more impressive than any mechanical device that man has made.’—Stuart Burgess, Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Bristol University.

The hands. The human hand is unique in creation. Prof. Stuart Burgess writes, “The human hand is one of the most precise and wonderful mechanical devices in creation and vastly more impressive than any mechanical device that man has made”.5

About a quarter of the entire motor cortex in the human brain is devoted to controlling the muscles of the hand. (The motor cortex is the part of the brain responsible for the movement of voluntary muscles.)

Human hands can, for example, build telescopes and microscopes to explore God’s creation, and they can construct and play musical instruments—producing the most beautiful music, and playing with incredible dexterity and virtuosity.

The abilities of the human hand seem to be vastly greater than those needed for survival and reproduction;6 but they are entirely appropriate for a being who is “made in the image of God”.

The face. Humans have an amazing and unique ability to make many types of intricate facial expression. There are about 40 named muscles in the human face and they can move every part of the face with precision. No other creature can do this, and it is completely unnecessary for survival and reproduction. But again, it is highly appropriate for a being of man’s mental and spiritual status. Another special feature of the human face is the fact that the whites of the eyes are visible. This feature greatly enhances the ability of humans to produce different kinds of facial expression, and to interact emotionally with other humans.

Language. Human speech is unique and enormously complex.7 The language of a hunter-gatherer living in the jungle is just as complex as yours and mine—often more so. It depends on unique features of the human body’s anatomy and the human brain. Again, this faculty is unnecessary for survival and reproduction (animals manage perfectly well without it), but it is highly appropriate for a being of man’s mental and spiritual status.

The brain. It is said that the human brain is the most complex structure in the universe, but that is an understatement! It is stupendous and mind-boggling in its complexity.8 On a purely physical level, it contains about 100 billion neurons (brain cells, each of which is stupendously and mind-bogglingly complex), with about 100 trillion connections. We have only the vaguest notions as to how it works. We are in the territory of both the body and the mind here. Again, the abilities and faculties of man’s brain are way beyond anything required for survival and reproduction, but they are entirely appropriate for someone who is “made in the image of God”.

The abilities and faculties of man’s brain are way beyond anything required for survival and reproduction, but they are entirely appropriate for someone who is ‘made in the image of God’

The mind

I believe that the human soul (which I am calling “the mind” in this article) is the seat of reason, will and emotion. These faculties are vastly superior to anything found in animals. They (the human faculties) are not at all necessary for survival and reproduction—which is one of many reasons why they cannot be accounted for by evolution—but as far as man’s spiritual status is concerned, they are a vital part of his makeup.

Reason. Man is a rational being who can deal with abstract ideas and concepts. He can explore and understand the physical universe because he is a rational being, and the universe was created by a rational God. In fact, modern science began and flourished in Europe because Christians believed this.9 The ability to speak, and to express abstract thoughts and ideas, is unique to the human race, and is part of his rational nature.

Man’s faculty of reason is far above anything possessed by the animals, which operate mainly by instinct. (Some animals do seem to have a very limited capacity for reason.) This is one reason why man was given dominion over all other creatures. The fact that man is a rational being is part of what it means to be “made in the image of God” (Genesis 1:27).

Will. The human will, with its ability to choose between right and wrong, is again far above anything possessed by animals. This also reflects the nature of God, and is part of what it means to be “made in the image of God”.

Emotion. Human beings experience a tremendous range of emotions, way beyond anything experienced by animals. The appreciation of beauty (including music) is one such emotion, apparently unique to the human race. This faculty also reflects the nature of God, and is part of what it means to be “made in the image of God”.

Conclusion

All these faculties of the human mind reflect the nature of God. However, God is spirit (John 4:24), and without a spirit, man would not be able to have a real relationship with God and be fully “made in the image of God”. The idea that there was a time when man’s ancestors possessed these unique faculties of the mind, but did not have a spirit, makes very little sense.

Neandertals had the faculty of speech, buried their dead ritualistically, played music, were artistic, made tools, and used fire. In other words, they were fully human.

Some theistic evolutionists may counter this by claiming that spiritless hominids did not possess human reason, will and emotion—because these are faculties of the spirit, not the mind. If that were true, it would mean that for millions of years, hominids developed abilities and faculties of the body (including the brain) which were appropriate for highly intelligent, spiritual beings, and totally inappropriate for brute beasts. And yet their minds remained those of brute beasts! This also makes very little sense, and is equally unscriptural, if not more so.

In fact, there is clear evidence that at least some so-called “hominids” did have the faculties of human reason, will and emotion. There is also evidence (in the form of ritual burials) of belief in an afterlife—which is evidence of spirituality. For example, there is evidence that the Neandertals had the faculty of speech, buried their dead ritualistically, played music, were artistic, made tools, and used fire.10 In other words, they were fully human. The fact is, there never were any hominids, in the sense of non-human “ape-men” ancestral to humans. This conclusion is supported by the fossil evidence when it is studied in an open-minded way, without preconceived naturalistic assumptions.11

Related Articles

References and notes

  1. See, for example, Batten, D. and Sarfati, J., 15 Reasons to Take Genesis as History, CMI, Brisbane, Australia, 2006. Return to text.
  2. See, for example, Sanford, J., Genetic Entropy & The Mystery of the Genome, FMS Publications, New York, 2008. John Sanford was a Professor of Genetics at Cornell University, and in this devastating book he reveals the absolute impossibility of macro-evolution. The human genome is steadily deteriorating, not improving. Return to text.
  3. Wallace, the “co-inventor” of Darwinism agreed. See Grigg, R., Alfred Russel Wallace co-inventor of Darwinism, Creation 27(4):33–35, 2005; creation.com/wallace. Return to text.
  4. Sarfati, J., Standing upright for creation interview with human spine expert Richard Porter, Creation 25(1):25–27, 2002; creation.com/porter. Return to text.
  5. Burgess, S., The origin of man, One Day Publications, Leominster, England, p. 38, 2004. Stuart Burgess is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Bristol University, specializing in “Design and Nature”. See interview, pp. 35–37 this issue. Return to text.
  6. Of course dexterity could help survival in the making of tools, spears, etc. However, the degree of dexterity seems far in excess of that needed for such survival skills. Return to text.
  7. May, K., Talking point, Creation 23(2):42–45, 2001; creation.com/talking. Return to text.
  8. Mind by design (interview with neuroscientist Peter Line), Creation 28(4):20–25, 2006; creation.com/Line. Return to text.
  9. See Williams, A., The biblical origins of science—A review of For The Glory of God: How Monotheism Led to Reformations, Science, Witch-hunts and the End of Slavery by Rodney Stark, Journal of Creation 18(2):49–52, 2004; creation.com/stark. Return to text.
  10. Lubenow, M.L., Manual dexterity in Neandertals, Journal of Creation 17(2):7–9, 2003; creation.com/nean_dext; creation.com/neandertal; creation.com/nean-speech; creation.com/nean-thought; creation.com/nean#superglue; creation.com/hominids. Return to text.
  11. Lubenow, M.L., Bones of Contention, Baker Books, Grand Rapids, USA, 2004. Return to text.

“One little bit doesn’t make a difference.” It’s a good job CMI didn’t think like that. We had to start somewhere producing information, one word and one article at a time. Similarly, please don’t think your small donation doesn’t help. They can add together to bring a shower of blessings. Support this site

Comments closed
Article closed for commenting.
Only available for 14 days from appearance on front page.
A reader’s comment
Ian H., Australia, 25 April 2011

This is an excellent article, and adds to the overwhelming evidence against evolution, especially theistic evolution. I have sent it to Denis Alexander, author of “Creation or Evolution”, of which I have already sent a critical review to the author, and to which he declined to respond.

Copied to clipboard
7885
Product added to cart.
Click store to checkout.
In your shopping cart

Remove All Products in Cart
Go to store and Checkout
Go to store
Total price does not include shipping costs. Prices subject to change in accordance with your country’s store.