What About Horse Toe Evolution?
by Rebekah L. Holt
Photo by Rebekah L. Holt
The horse—a marvel of design, not blind evolution.
According to Darwin’s ideas on equine origins, the ancestor of the horse,
millions of years ago, was a five-toed, fox-sized creature.1 Through random change, blind selection, and almost
endless time, the original five toes fell by ones and twos, as the ancestors of
the horse grew from rodent to equine.
Evolutionists teach that the hoof remains the sole toe of perfected horse evolution.
The theory also proclaims that other existing parts of the leg, specifically the
chestnut, the splint bones and the ergot, are all vestigial (leftover, useless)
remains of horse evolution’s missing toes.
So what is the truth about horse toes? According to Genesis chapter 1, the equine
kind2 was masterfully created
on the sixth day. God in His skilful design made the equine and its foot like no
other.
By studying each member of the ‘toe vestiges,’ we can discover fingerprints
of the Divine Creator and gather evidence to refute Darwin’s false assumptions.
The Hoof
Photo by Rebekah L. Holt
The equine hoof—a testimony to design
The hoof, or equine foot, is vital to a horse’s existence. This horny structure
is located on the very end of a horse’s leg. Hooves play such a crucial role
in the health and well-being of the horse that the old adage, ‘No hoof, no
horse’ is true.
To study the equine foot uncovers a structural wonder which causes farrier, veterinarian,
and layman alike to marvel. Here are just some of the tasks the hoof is designed
to perform:
- Absorb shock.3
- Provide traction.4
- Assist the heart in pumping blood.5
- Resist wear and fracturing.6
- Protect the sensitive structures within the hoof wall.7
- Support body weight. (Front hooves carry 60% and rear hooves 40% of the actual body
weight.8)
- Conduct moisture throughout the hoof wall.9
Splint bones actually are far from useless bits of bone.
Imagine the horse’s hooves as suction cups that compress with each step to
absorb shock while gripping the surface to aid traction. With each step, the inner
structures of the hoof work like a pump, compress-and-release, shooting life-giving
blood back up the leg and to the heart. Hundreds of microscopic, straw-like tubules
serve to reinforce the hoof wall’s strength and draw ground moisture with
capillary action to hydrate the hoof wall.
If even one part of the horse’s foot is out of place, the result is lameness,
often chronic or painfully disabling.
Splint Bones
Illustration by Rebekah L. Holt
Front limb
Illustration by Rebekah L. Holt

Front splints rear view
Hailed as ‘vestigial’ or useless leftovers of evolution, splint bones
actually are far from useless bits of bone. Splints are two icicle-shaped bones
found on the back of each leg. They support the carpal joints (front knee) on either
side of the cannon bone, and the tarsal (or hock) joints on the rear leg. In addition
to assisting weight support, splints form a vital ‘groove’ and protection
for ligaments and tendons that enable equine locomotion.10
Dr. Doug Butler, a leading authority on farrier science, wrote concerning splint
bones:
‘The function of the splint bones is to protect the tendons and ligaments
and especially the blood vessels and nerves which pass down the back of the leg.
They also provide a greater bearing surface for weight by supporting a portion of
the carpal bones of the knee joint. They are necessary, not vestigial.’
[Emphasis added]
Regression, shortening or loss of toes, is not helpful to the progressive evolutionary
theory, which requires an overall increase in genetic complexity.
Cases have been reported of multi-toed (polydactyl) horses with extended splint
bones as extra toes.11
There are skeletons of horses with splint bones extending as two extra toes. Does
this prove Darwin’s theory of a transitional creature evolving into a horse?
Certainly not! It only illustrates that a totally equine skeleton had extra long
splint bones supporting its fossilized leg that at one time supported a member of
the equine kind. The modern equine’s regressing splints suggest only that
the genetic material for extended splints has been lost. Regression, shortening
or loss of toes, is not helpful to the progressive evolutionary theory, which requires
an overall increase in genetic complexity.
The Chestnut
Photo by Rebekah L. Holt
Everyone wonders what the chestnut really is. Science has not yet satisfactorily
explained this little mystery. It is popularly believed that the chestnut has shrunk
from a toe in the horse’s ancestor into a horny little growth inside of the
horse’s leg. While that may be so (devolution is quite possible in a creation
model, and is unhelpful to evolution, as shown above), it seems premature to call
it vestigial. A respected veterinarian handbook states:
‘Contrary to popular belief, they [chestnuts] do not represent the vestiges
of missing digits.’12
Chestnuts are called the ‘fingerprints’ of horses; each is individual
in shape and texture. They can serve as identification just like our fingerprints
do.13
It’s largely believed that chestnuts are scent glands (llamas have such glands
in a similar place, thought to make alarm pheromones). They carry the strong trademark
aroma of ‘horse.’14
Photo by Rebekah L. Holt
Chestnuts and ergots are unique to each horse and can be used for identification.
The photos show chestnut and ergot variations of the forelimbs of three American
Quarter Horse mares. The mare to the far right did not have an ergot growth—these,
and chestnuts, are commonly absent in all breeds.
The Ergot
Illustration by Rebekah L. Holt

Orange depicts ergot ligament and ergot. Yellow, nerve and black, artery.
The ergot, a small, bony growth located on the back of the fetlock joint, is considered
the last of Darwin’s missing horse toes. It too is taught as a vestigial leftover
of the evolving horse series.
While the ergot may seem to be a useless little bump, it actually is an anchoring
point for the ergot ligament—the most superficial (close to the surface) of
the ligaments found on a horse’s leg.15
Conclusion
A recipe must have a chef, a portrait must have a painter, and a creature must have
a Creator. As Christians, we can rejoice that humans and all other creatures are
not remnants of thoughtless evolution, but creatures skillfully designed by our
Lord and Creator.
As Revelation 4:11 declares, ‘Thou art worthy, O Lord,
to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for
thy pleasure they are and were created.’
Related articles
References
- The fossil of this supposed ancestor has been called Eohippus
(dawn horse) but its original (and proper) name is Hyracotherium, reflecting
its similarity not to horses, but to the living hyrax, or rock badger, aka coney.
It may well be an ancestor of the hyrax. Return to text.
- This most likely was the ancestor of today’s horses,
zebras and asses, which can all interbreed. Return to text.
- Giffin, James M., M.D. & Tom Gore, D.V.M., Horse Owner’s
Veterinary Handbook, Second Edition, Howell Book House, New York, 1998, page
307. Return to text.
- Butler, Doug. PhD., The Principles of Horseshoeing II,
Doug Butler Publication, Maryville, Missouri, 1985, page 121. Return
to text.
- Ref. 4, page 120. Return to text.
- Bertram JE, Gosline JM,
Fracture Toughness Design in Horse Hoof Keratin, The Journal of Experimental
Biology 125(1):29–47, September 1986.
Return to text.
- Pollitt, Christopher C., BVSc, Ph.D.,
The Anatomy of the Inner Hoof Wall, The International Equine Research Center,
The Farrier and Hoof Care Research Center, as at 14 June 2008. Return
to text.
- Ref. 3, page 261. Return to text.
- Ref. 4, pages 138–139. Return to
text.
- Ref. 2, page 100. Return to text.
- Carstanjen B, Abitbol M, and Desbois C,
Bilateral Polydactyly in a Foal, Journal of Veterinary Science
8(2):201–203, June 2007. Return to text.
- Ref. 3, page 87. Return to text.
- Hadden, Will A., III, D.V.M., Horseman’s Veterinary
Encyclopedia, The Lyons Press, Guilford, Connecticut, 2005, page 169.
Return to text.
- Wolfrom, Glen,
Horse Chestnuts, Creation Matters 3(4):5, July–August
1998. Return to text.
- Ref. 4, page 116. Return to text.
Published: 25 July 2008(GMT+10)
|