Why is there death and suffering?
by Ken Ham and Dr Jonathan
Sarfati
Death and suffering is everywhere!
‘Earthquake Claims 10,000 in India.’ ‘Thousands Perish in Bangladesh’s
Flood.’ Tragedy is constantly in the news, including large-scale, ‘senseless’
disasters that snuff out the lives of thousands, such as the terrorist attacks on
New York’s World Trade Center. Nor is tragedy confined to today—it wasn’t
too long ago that an evil regime wiped out 6 million Jews and many others. In addition
to the headline events, each of us suffers pain at one time or another—illness,
headaches, accidents and death. It’s not surprising, when the burdens become
too great, that people cry out to God in anguish, ‘Why don’t you do
anything? Don’t you care?’
How can an all-powerful, loving God allow suffering?
As the shock of each traumatic event subsides, people begin asking why such things
occur. Reading about past wars or visiting memorials like the Holocaust Museum in
Washington, D.C., inevitably raises the same question, ‘How can there be a
loving God controlling the universe in the light of such death and suffering?’
The pervasiveness of suffering is possibly the most effective tool that atheists
use to attack the Bible’s picture of a ‘loving God.’ Atheists
make what appears to be a reasonable complaint: ‘If God is loving and all-powerful,
then why doesn’t He use His power to stop the evil, suffering, pain and death?’
Multitudes have rejected God because of suffering!
Sadly, most people—even Christians—have no ready answer to the question
of death and suffering in the world. Believing that the world is millions or billions
of years old, they have a difficult time explaining the purpose behind the apparent
cruelty that they see.
Charles Darwin rejected Christianity after the death of his daughter.
‘Annie’s cruel death destroyed Charles’s tatters of beliefs in
a moral, just universe. Later he would say that this period chimed the final death-knell
for his Christianity,’ says a recent biography of Charles Darwin. ‘…Charles
now took his stand as an unbeliever.’1
Darwin is only one of thousands of famous people who have struggled with this issue,
trying to reconcile belief in God with the death and suffering he observed all around,
that he believed had gone on for millions of years. Darwin’s struggle came
to a climax with the death of his daughter Annie.2
When Charles Darwin wrote his landmark book On the Origin of Species, he
was in essence writing a history of suffering and death. In the conclusion of the
chapter entitled On The Imperfections Of The Geological Record, Darwin
said the modern world has arisen ‘from the war of nature, from famine and
death.’3 Based on his
evolutionary perspective, Darwin considered death to be a permanent part of the
world.
The billionaire Ted Turner, a famous media mogul, says he lost his faith after his
sister died.
The New York Times ran a sobering article, saying, ‘Turner is a strident
nonbeliever, having lost his faith after his sister … died of a painful disease.
… “I was taught that God was love and God was powerful,” Turner
said, “And I couldn’t understand how someone so innocent should be made
or allowed to suffer so.”’4
A famous evangelist rejected Christianity, in part because of the suffering he saw.
Former well-known evangelist, the late Charles Templeton, published Farewell to
God in 1996,5,6 describing his slide into unbelief and his rejection
of Christianity. Once listed among those ‘best used of God’ by the National
Association of Evangelicals,7
Templeton listed several ‘reasons for rejecting the Christian faith.’
For instance:
-
Geneticists say it is ‘nonsense’ to believe that sin is the ‘reason
for all the crime, poverty, suffering, and general wickedness in the world.’8
-
The ‘grim and inescapable reality’ is that ‘all life is predicated
on death. Every carnivorous creature must kill and devour another
creature. It has no option.’9
Templeton, like Charles Darwin, had a big problem understanding how to reconcile
an Earth full of death, disease and suffering with the loving God of the Bible.
Templeton stated:
‘Why does God’s grand design require creatures with teeth designed to
crush spines or rend flesh, claws fashioned to seize and tear, venom to paralyze,
mouths to suck blood, coils to constrict and smother—even expandable jaws
so that prey may be swallowed whole and alive? … Nature is in Tennyson’s
vivid phrase, “red [with blood] in tooth and claw,” and life is a carnival
of blood.’10
Templeton then concludes: ‘How could a loving and omnipotent God create such
horrors as we have been contemplating?’11
Templeton is not the first person to talk like this. When told that there is a God
of love who made the world, embittered people often reply: ‘I don’t
see any God of love. All I see are children suffering and dying. I see people killing
and stealing. Disease and death are everywhere. Nature is “red in tooth and
claw.” It’s a horrible world. I don’t see your God of love. If
your God does exist, He must be a sadistic ogre.’
Does an atheist really have a case?
It’s often useful to ask a questioner to justify the validity of his question
under his own belief system. For an atheist to complain that the Christian
God is ‘evil,’ he must provide a standard of good and evil by which
to judge Him. But if we are simply evolved pond scum, as a consistent atheist must
believe, where can we find an objective standard of right and wrong?
Our ideas of right and wrong, under this system, are merely outcomes of some chemical
processes that occur in the brain, which happened to confer survival advantage on
our alleged ape-like ancestors. But the notions in Hitler’s brain obeyed the
same chemical laws as those in Mother Teresa’s, so on what grounds are the
latter’s actions ‘better’ than the former’s? Also, why should
the terrorist attack slaying thousands of people in New York be more terrible than
a frog killing thousands of flies?
A Christian, however, believes there is an objective standard of morality that rises
above individual humans, because it is set by an objective and transcendent moral
Lawgiver who is our Creator. An atheist’s argument against God because of
objective evil inadvertently concedes the very point he is trying to argue against!
Such questions about God stem from a wrong view of history
Belief
in evolution and/or millions of years of history necessitates that death has been
a part of history since life first appeared on this planet. If you believe that
the fossil layers (containing billions of dead things) represent the history of
life over millions of years, it’s a very ugly record—full of death,
disease and suffering.
‘Time and death.’
The late evolutionary scientist Carl Sagan described Darwin’s
view of death well: ‘The secrets of evolution are time and death.’12 This sums up the most widely
accepted history of death in this world. According to this view, (1) death, suffering
and disease over millions of years led up to man’s emergence; (2) death, suffering
and disease exist in this present world; and (3) death, suffering and disease will
continue into the unknown future. Death is a permanent part of history, and death
is our ally in the ‘creation’ of life.
Implications about suffering, if you accept this view of history.
If one believes in millions of years, then this world has always been a deadly place.
The question that we naturally ask is ‘Who caused the cancer, disease and
violence represented in the fossil record?’ Christians who believe in millions
of years of history have a serious problem. The Bible plainly says that God is the
Creator, and He called everything that He had made—before, leading
up to, and including Adam and Eve, but before their Fall—‘very
good’ (Genesis
1:31).
This situation is represented in the following:
As
soon as Christians allow for death, suffering and disease before Adam’s sin
(which they automatically must if they believe in millions of years), then
they’ve raised a serious question about their Gospel message. What, then,
has sin done to the world? According to Christian teaching, death is the penalty
for sin (Romans
6:23)—and this fact is the foundation of the Gospel! Moreover, how
can all things be ‘restored’ to a state with no death, pain or tears
in the future (Revelation
21:4) if there never was a time free of death and suffering? The
whole message of the Gospel falls apart if you have this view of history. It also
would mean that God is to blame for death.
The Bible gives the right view of history—and the right view of God!
Fortunately, God has given us a different account of the history of death, recorded
in His Word—the Bible. This historical document connects to real issues of
life, and it fully explains why horrible things happen. In fact, God’s Word
has much to say about death.
‘Sin and death.’
This phrase sums up the true history of death, as recorded in Genesis, the first
book of the Bible. God originally created a perfect world, described by God as ‘very good’ (Genesis
1:31). People and animals ate plants, not other animals (Genesis
1:29–30). There was no violence or pain in this ‘very
good’ world.
But this sinless world was marred by the rebellion of the first man, Adam. His sin
brought an intruder into the world—death. God had to judge sin with
death, as He warned Adam He would (Genesis
2:17, cf.
3:19).
Indeed, God apparently caused the first death in the world—an animal was slain
to make clothing for Adam and Eve (Genesis
3:21). As a result of God’s judgment on the world, God has given us
a taste of life without Him—a world that is running down—a world full
of death and suffering. As Romans 8:22 says, ‘the whole
creation groans and labors with birth pangs’—because God
Himself subjected the creation to processes of decay (v.
20).
Implications about suffering, if you accept this view of history.
How can we find a God of love amidst the groaning of this world? By understanding
the Genesis account of the Fall, we know that we are looking at a fallen, cursed
world. From the Bible’s perspective of history, death is an enemy, not an
ally. In
1 Corinthians 15:26, the Apostle Paul describes death as the
‘last enemy.’ Death was not a part of God’s
original creation, which truly was ‘very good.’
Based on a straightforward reading of the Genesis account, history can be represented
by the following diagram:
Death and suffering is the penalty for sin. When Adam rebelled against God, in effect
he was saying that he wanted life without God. He wanted to decide truth for himself,
independent of God. Now the Bible tells us that Adam was the head of the human race,
representing each one of us, who are his descendants. Paul says in Romans 5:12–19
that we sin ‘in Adam,’ after the likeness
of Adam. In other words, we have the same problem Adam had. When Adam rebelled against
God, all human beings, represented by Adam, effectively said that they wanted life
without God.
God
had to judge Adam’s sin with death. He had already warned Adam that if he
sinned, he would ‘surely die.’ After
Adam’s Fall, he and all his descendants forfeited the right to live. After
all, God is the author of life. Death is the natural penalty of choosing life without
God, the giver of life. Also, because the Lord is holy and just, there had to be
a penalty for rebellion.
The Bible makes it clear that death is the penalty for our sin, not just
the sin of Adam. If you accept the Bible’s account of history, then our sins—not
just the sins of ‘the other guy’—are responsible for all the death
and suffering in the world! In other words, it is really our fault that
the world is the way it is. No-one is really ‘innocent.’
God has removed His sustaining power—temporarily.
At the same time that God judged sin with death, He withdrew some of His sustaining
power.
Romans 8:22 tells us that the whole of creation is groaning and travailing
in pain. Everything is running down because of sin. God has given us a taste of
life without Him—a world full of violence, death, suffering and disease. If
God withdrew all of His sustaining power, the creation would cease to exist.
Colossians 1:16–17 tells us that all things are held together, right
now, by the power of the Creator, the Lord Jesus Christ. However, in one sense He
is not holding it together perfectly, as He is deliberately letting things fall
apart to give us a taste of what life is like without God. In other words, God is
allowing us to experience what we wanted—life without God (cf. Romans 1:18–32).
In the Old Testament, we get a glimpse of what the world is like when God upholds
things one-hundred percent. In
Deuteronomy 29:5 and
Nehemiah 9:21, we are told that the Israelites wandered in the desert
for 40 years, and yet their clothes didn’t wear out, their shoes didn’t
wear out and their feet didn’t swell. Obviously God miraculously upheld their
clothing, shoes and feet so that they would not wear out or fall apart as the rest
of the creation is doing. One can only imagine what the world would be like if God
upheld every detail of it like this.
The book of
Daniel, chapter 3, gives us another glimpse, when we read about Shadrach,
Meshach and Abednego walking into an intensely blazing furnace yet coming out without
even the smell of smoke on their clothes. When the Lord Jesus Christ, the Creator
of the universe, upheld their bodies and clothing in the midst of fire (v. 25),
nothing could be hurt or destroyed.
These examples help us understand a little of what it would be like if God upheld
every aspect of the creation—nothing would fall apart.
At present, we are living in a universe where things are decaying. Around us we
see death, suffering and disease—all as a result of God’s judgment against
sin and His withdrawal of some of His sustaining power to give us what we asked
for—a taste of life without God. Thus, looking through ‘Biblical lenses,’
we see our sin in Adam as the ‘big-picture’ perspective on tragic events,
such as the actions of terrorists. Of course, such specific evil acts were also
a result of the individual sin of the terrorists. The suffering caused by the earthquake
in India, by contrast, cannot be blamed on any individual’s sin today, but
is still the consequence of sin in general (more on this below).
In contrast to the view that death and suffering have continued for millions of
years, this Biblical view of history has a wonderful implication for the future.
The world will one day be restored (Acts
3:21) to a state in which, once again, there will be no violence and death.
According to
Isaiah 11:6–9, wolves and lambs, leopards and goats, lions and calves,
and snakes and children, will dwell together peacefully. Clearly, this future state
reflects the paradise that was once lost, not some imaginary land that never existed.
All right, so Adam’s Fall explains sorrow in general,
but what about specific cases of ‘senseless suffering’?
The Bible teaches that suffering is part of the ‘big picture’ involving
sin, but individual cases of suffering are not always correlated
with particular sins of individuals.
God allowed the suffering of righteous Job.
A man named Job, who was the most righteous man on Earth at his time, suffered intensely—losing
all his children, servants and possessions in a single day; then he was struck by
a painful illness. The Lord never told Job the specific reasons for his suffering,
but God lets every reader of the book of Job witness some extraordinary ‘behind-the-scenes’
events in Heaven, which Job never saw. The Lord had reasons for allowing Job’s
suffering, but He never told Job these reasons, and He demanded that Job not question
the decisions of his Maker.
Jesus was asked why a man was born blind.
When Jesus and His disciples passed by a blind man, His disciples asked Him whether
the man’s blindness from birth was due to his own sin or the sin of his parents.
Jesus explained that neither was the case. The man was born blind so that God could
demonstrate His power (when Jesus healed him,
John 9:1-7).
Jesus discussed why eighteen Jews died tragically when the tower of Siloam collapsed.
Jesus said something that is directly applicable to modern tragedies, such as the
terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in the United States
on September 11, 2001.
Luke 13:4 records His words: ‘Those eighteen who died
when the tower in Siloam fell on them—do you think they were sinners above
all the others living in Jerusalem? I tell you, no!’ Suffering
in our lives is not always related to our personal sin.
Note, however, that Jesus went on to say that ‘unless
you repent, you will all likewise perish.’ Though this may have
been referring to perishing physically in the coming downfall of Jerusalem, the
bottom line is that no-one is innocent. All of us are sinners and therefore condemned
to die. Thousands of people died in the World Trade Center catastrophe, but the
hundreds of millions of people who saw and heard about this event will also die
one day—in fact, thousands of them are dying every day—because all humans
have been given the death penalty because of sin.
The account of the rich man and Lazarus is a key to understanding suffering.
The Bible is never embarrassed to talk about the question of suffering. God’s
past judgments have included almost every type of suffering imaginable, and He repeatedly
asserts His absolute power and authority over men’s lives. Yet in one of Christ’s
most memorable teachings (Luke
16:19–31), the Son of God gives the key to understanding the apparent
injustices of this world.
A wicked rich man lived in splendor, while a faithful beggar named Lazarus sat at
the rich man’s gate, covered with sores and eating table scraps. But the story
does not end here. There is an eternal world to come, where God will make all things
right. The hope of a resurrection is the key to understanding our suffering.13
Once, the twentieth-century atheistic philosopher Bertrand Russell claimed that
no-one could sit by the bedside of a child with a terminal disease and believe in
a loving God. A minister who actually had experience with dying children (unlike
Russell who never got his own hands dirty with such practical things) challenged
Russell to explain what he could offer such a child. An atheist could only say,
‘Sorry, chap, you’ve had your chips, and that’s the end of everything
for you.’ But the Christian has hope that this life is not the end.
The Apostle Paul found reasons to ‘glory in my infirmities.’
Paul’s ‘résumé of suffering’ included torture, beatings,
imprisonment, stoning, shipwreck, robbery, infirmities, exhaustion, hunger, thirst,
and cold. His letters show that Christ’s Resurrection was the key to his making
sense of his suffering. Without the Resurrection, ‘then
is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain, … [and] we are of all
men most miserable’ (1 Corinthians 15:14, 19).
Though sometimes we will never see in this life the reasons for some suffering,
Paul’s letters contain practical reasons for the suffering of God’s
children, even when they have done nothing wrong. For instance:
- Suffering can ‘perfect’ us, or make us mature in the image of Christ.
(Job
23:10,
Hebrews 5:8–9).
- Suffering can help some to come to know Christ.
- Suffering can make us more able to comfort others who suffer.
Is God doing anything about death and suffering?
People who accuse God of sitting back and doing nothing are missing a vital truth.
In reality, God has already done everything you would want a loving God to do—and
infinitely more!
The Son of God became a man and endured both suffering and a horrible death on man’s
behalf.
Adam’s sin left mankind in a terrible predicament. Even though our bodies
die, we are made in the image of God, and thus we have souls that are immortal.
Our conscious being is going to live forever. Unless God intervened, Adam’s
sin meant that we would spend an eternity of suffering and separation from Him.
The only way for us to restore our life with God is if we are able to come to Him
with the penalty paid for our sin. Leviticus 17:11 helps us to understand how this
can be done. It says, ‘The life of the flesh is in the
blood.’ Blood represents life. The New Testament explains that
‘without the shedding of blood there is no remission [of
sins]’ (Hebrews 9:22). God makes it clear that, because we are
creatures of flesh and blood, the only way to pay the penalty for our sin is if
blood is shed to take away our sin.
In the Garden of Eden, God killed an animal and clothed Adam and Eve as a picture
of a covering for our sin. A blood sacrifice was needed because of our
sin. The Israelites sacrificed animals over and over again; however, because Adam’s
blood does not flow in animals, animal blood, though it could temporarily cover
our sin, could never take it away. The Hebrew word translated ‘atonement’
is כפר (kaphar), which
means ‘cover.’
The solution was God’s plan to send His Son, the Second Person of the triune
Godhead, the Lord Jesus Christ, to become a man—a perfect man—to be
a sacrifice for sin. In the person of Jesus Christ, our Creator God stepped into
history (John
1:1–14) to become a physical descendant of Adam, called
‘the last Adam’ (1
Corinthians 15:45), born of a virgin. Because the Holy Spirit overshadowed
His mother (Luke
1:35), He was a perfect man, one without sin—despite having been tempted
in every way that we are (Hebrews
4:15)—who thus could shed His blood on a cross for our sin.
Because mankind’s first representative head—Adam—was responsible
for bringing sin and death into the world, the human race can now have a new representative—the
‘last Adam’—who paid the penalty
for sin. No sinner could pay for the sins of others, but this last Adam—Jesus
Christ—was a perfect man. God in human flesh was able to bear the sins and
sorrows of the world.
The Son of God rose from the grave so that He could provide eternal life for all
who believe (John 3:16).
After Christ’s suffering and death, He rose from the dead, showing He had
ultimate power—power over death. He can now give eternal life to anyone who
receives it by faith (John
1:12,
Ephesians 2:8–9). The Bible teaches us that those who believe
in the Lord Jesus Christ, and believe that God has raised Him from the dead, and
receive Him as Lord and Savior, will spend eternity with God (1 Corinthians
15:1–4).
The Son of God sympathizes with our sorrows.
Christ’s suffering and death mean that God Himself can personally empathize
with our suffering, because He has experienced it. His followers have a High Priest—Jesus—who
can be ‘touched with the feeling of our infirmities. …
Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy,
and find grace to help in time of need’ (Hebrews 4:15–16).
How long will this suffering and death go on?
People who complain about the suffering on this Earth need to understand God’s
perspective of time. God dwells in eternity, and He is lovingly preparing His people
to spend an eternity with Him. As the Apostle Paul said, ‘I
reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not to be compared with the
glory which shall be revealed in us’ (Romans 8:18). The book of
Hebrews says that Jesus Himself, ‘for the glory that was
set before him, endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right
hand of the throne of God’ (Hebrews 12:2).
The present suffering—intense as it can be at times—is so insignificant,
in view of eternity, that it can’t even be compared to the glory to come.
God has prepared an eternal home where there will be no more death or suffering.
Those who put their trust in Christ as Savior have a wonderful hope—they can
spend eternity with the Lord in a place where there will be no more death. ‘And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and
there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be
any more pain: for the former things are passed away’ (Revelation
21:4).
Indeed, death is really the path that opens the way to this wonderful place, called
Heaven. If we lived forever, we would never have an opportunity to shed this sinful
state. But God wants us to have a new body, and He wants us to dwell with Him forever.
In fact, the Bible states that ‘precious in the sight
of the LORD is the death of his saints’ (Psalm 116:15). Death is
‘precious’ because sinners who have trusted Christ will enter into the
presence of their Creator, in a place where righteousness dwells.
There is also a place of eternal separation from God.
The Bible warns that those who reject Christ will taste a ‘second
death’—eternal separation from God (Revelation
21:8).
Most of us have heard about Hell, a place of fire and torment. None other than Jesus
Christ warned of this place more than He spoke of Heaven. He also made it clear
that the torment of the wicked was as eternal (Greek aionios) as the life
of the blessed (Matthew
25:46). God does not delight in the death of the wicked.
‘Say unto them, As I live, said the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death
of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn, turn from your
evil ways; for why will you die, O house of Israel?’ (Ezekiel
33:11). God takes no pleasure in the afflictions and calamities of people. He is
a loving, merciful God—it is our fault that man is in the current
state of suffering and death.
As we face horrible suffering, such as the tragedy at the World Trade Center, let
it remind us that the ultimate cause of such calamity is our sin—our rebellion
against God. Our loving God, despite our sinfulness, wants us to spend eternity
with Him. Christians need to stretch forth a loving, comforting arm to those who
are in need of comfort and strength during times of suffering. They can find strength
in the arms of a loving Creator who hates Death—the enemy that will one day
be thrown into the Lake of Fire (Revelation
20:14).
There is no conflict between the statements ‘God is all-powerful and loving’
and ‘the world is full of suffering and evil.’ For God to rid the world
of evil would require ridding the world of us! Instead, God wants us to be saved
from His wrath to come. One day, God will indeed rid the world of evil.
We have two options: separate from our sins by trusting in Christ, and dwell with
God forever; or cling to our sins, in which case God will grant our wish and separate
us from Himself for eternity. This is why Jesus on the Day of Judgment says to evildoers,
‘Depart from me …’ (Matthew 7:23,
Luke 13:27).
When we understand the origin of death and the Gospel of Jesus Christ as proclaimed
in the Bible, then we can understand why this world is the way it is and how there
can be a loving God in the midst of tragedy, violence, suffering and death. Which
view of death do you accept? Is it one that makes God an ogre responsible for millions
of years of death, disease and suffering? Or is it one that places the blame on
our sin, and pictures our Creator God as a loving, merciful Savior who wept over
the city of Jerusalem, who wept at the tomb of His friend Lazarus, and who weeps
for all of us?
Discover how you can have everlasting life with the Creator
of the universe…
Printed copies of this in Chinese (Simplified) can be ordered through Bookstore/MC Literature.
References
- Desmond, A., and Moore, J., Darwin: The Life of a Tormented
Evolutionist, W.W. Norton & Company, New York, p. 387, 1991.
Return to text.
- Desmond and Moore, p. 387. Return to text.
- Darwin, C., On the Origin of Species, Harvard University
Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, p. 490, 1964 (1859). Return to text.
- Associated Press, ‘Ted Turner was suicidal after breakup,’
<www.nytimes.com/aponline/arts/AP-People-Turner.html>, April 16, 2001.
Return to text.
- Templeton, C., Farewell to God, McClelland & Stewart,
Inc., Toronto, Canada, 1996. Return to text.
- For a refutation of Templeton’s arguments, see Ham, K.,
and Byers, S., ‘The slippery slide to unbelief: A famous
evangelist goes from hope to hopelessness,’ Creation 22(3):8–13,
June–August 2000. Return to text.
- Martin, W., A Prophet with Honor: The Billy Graham Story,
William Morrow and Company, Inc., New York, p. 110, 1991. Return to
text.
- Templeton, C., Ref. 5, p. 30. Return to text.
- Templeton, C., Ref. 5, p. 198. Return to text.
- Templeton, C., Ref. 5, pp. 198–199.
Return to text.
- Templeton, C., Ref. 5, p. 201. Return to
text.
- Sagan, C., Cosmos Part 2: One Voice in the Cosmic Fugue,
produced by Public Broadcasting Company in Los Angeles with af. liate station KCET-TV,
and first aired in 1980 on PBS stations throughout the US. Return
to text.
- Wilder-Smith, A.E., Is This A God Of Love? TWFT Publishers,
Costa Mesa, California, pp. 43–46, 1991. Return to text.
(Article available in Chinese (Simplified) and Italian)
|