Share
A- A A+
Free Email News
The Creation Answers Book
by Various

US $9.00
View Item
Creation, Fall, Restoration
by Andrew S. Kulikovsky

US $24.00
View Item
The Image of God DVD
by David Aikman

US $13.00
View Item

Feedback archive Feedback 2013

Are women made in God’s image?

wikipedia.org

Adam-Eve

Published: 4 August 2013 (GMT+10)

Jason C. asks:

Re: Gen 1:27—Are man and women both really made in the image of God?

‘So God created man in His own image; He created Him in the image of God; He created them male and female".

It seems the first part is the main statement with the next 2 pieces more descriptive. Image is related to ‘man’ first and then further explained as ‘him’ (singular) and when female is introduced, it just says He created ‘them’—no word image with female. Also, undoubtedly related, In 1 Cor, Paul also says that man was created in God’s image but women are the glory (reads as if he’s saying image) of man… Am I missing something out of the original languages?

At the end of the day, it really won’t change my view on equality—but it might help with understanding roles better. tks

CMI’s responds:

Hi Jason,

Thanks for the question.

Yes, the Bible teaches that both men and women were created in God’s image. Consider the following passages.

The Hebrew word for ‘man’ frequently refers to mankind as a whole.

Gen. 1:26—Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion…”

The Hebrew word for “man” in this verse is adam, which can sometimes refer to a single male individual (or to Adam as a proper name) but frequently refers to mankind as a whole. In this case, it must refer to all of mankind since the next sentence uses the plural pronoun “them”. In the next verse, which you cited, it does switch to the singular pronoun “him”, but I think this is still referring to mankind collectively. Verse 26 tells us what God planned to do and then vv. 27 ff. tell us how he carried this out, so we should understand “man” to be the same in both cases.

Although it uses a different word for “man”, Psalm 8:4 ff. does the same sort of thing when it says, “What is man that you are mindful of him.” All of humanity is in view even though it uses the singular.

Gen. 5:1–2—This is the book of the generations of Adam. When God created man, he made him in the likeness of God. Male and female he created them, and he blessed them and named them Man when they were created.

Here again, we see that male and female are together called “man”, so when the author uses the singular pronoun in v. 1, he is thinking of mankind as a singular collective body, not as an individual or as a group of only males.

Gen. 9:6—Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image.

Surely this verse does not apply only to males. The idea is that all human beings are made in God’s image, and therefore God instituted a punishment for murderers.

James 3:9—With it we bless our Lord and Father, and with it we curse people who are made in the likeness of God.

According to James, all people are made in God’s image.

Here, the Greek word for “people” is a plural form of anthropos. The term can refer to just males, but is the usual New Testament word for a mixed group of men and women. In this context, James is clearly talking about cursing people in general, not only males. So, according to James, all people are made in God’s image.

With all these passages in mind, then, what about 1 Cor. 11:7? Well, without trying to get into a detailed interpretation, this chapter highlights some differences in gender roles. Paul does not say that women were not created in God’s image, but in vv. 8–9 he does highlight the fact that Eve, as the prototypical woman/wife, was created as a helper for Adam, not vice versa. This is the reason Paul gives for saying what he says in v. 7. He is no more denying that each woman is made in the image of God in v. 7 than he is denying that Christ is in authority over every woman in v. 3.

I hope that clears it up for you. You might also be interested in these articles:

The Bible’s high view of women grounded in the creation account
London Times reports that the Bible is not anti-female: is this news?
Made in the image of God

Regards,

Keaton Halley

Related Articles


“One little bit doesn’t make a difference.” It’s a good job CMI didn’t think like that. We had to start somewhere producing information, one word and one article at a time. Similarly, please don’t think your small donation doesn’t help. They can add together to bring a shower of blessings. Support this site

Comments closed
Article closed for commenting.
Only available for 14 days from appearance on front page.
Readers’ comments
Paula S., United States, 4 August 2013

[Paul referring to those who are saved by faith in Christ] "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you all are one in Christ Jesus." Galatians 3:28

Brian D., United States, 5 August 2013

How are we, today, made in God's image? We have a body, soul, and spirit. If women are not made in God's image, then they must lack one of them.

It's obvious that they have a body. It's also apparent that they have a soul (the soul is our mind, personality, and emotions). The spirit is harder to see, unless you believe the Bible's teaching that all me have one. The concept that men and women have a spirit is referenced hundreds of times throughout the Bible.

Women, just like men, have a body, soul, and spirit. Therefore, they are made just as much in the image of God as man is.

margaret P., United Kingdom, 5 August 2013

Usually 'man' refers to mankind and 'men' refers to males.

Mario D., Sweden, 8 August 2013

I disagree. It seems clear to me that man was made in God's image, but woman was made in man's image: Genesis 18:21-23 And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.

It clearly states that woman was "taken out of Man" i.e. made in Man's image.

Keaton Halley responds

Thanks for your input, Mario, but I fail to see why we should equate being "taken out of Man" with being made in his image. Also, the reference should be Genesis 2:21-23.

James Dickie V., United States, 9 August 2013

My view is very different. Genesis 1:26-27-So God created man in His own image, in the image of God, created He them. To me that means when He created man, he created both male and female in one body, the body of man, then 2:21 He put man to sleep, took a rib out of his body and created the woman, whom Adam called woman, because she was taken out of man. Man and woman are equal in relationship, but the two have completely different roles in the game of life!!!

Keaton Halley responds

You left out part of Genesis 1:27 which says God created them male and female. This verse is a brief summary of the creation of humans and Genesis 2 fills in the details. Before Eve, Adam is always described as male, not androgynous. And note Paul's teaching that the first man came before the first woman—both sexes were not created simultaneously (1 Cor. 11:8; 1 Tim. 2:13).

Comments closed
Article closed for commenting.
Only available for 14 days from appearance on front page.
Copied to clipboard
9314
Product added to cart.
Click store to checkout.
In your shopping cart

Remove All Products in Cart
Go to store and Checkout
Go to store
Total price does not include shipping costs. Prices subject to change in accordance with your country’s store.