Creation 19(4):56, September 1997
Browse our latest digital issue Subscribe
The painting in the photo shown caused at least one art expert1 to ‘shiver with excitement’ when she saw it. She thought it was a great discovery.
Its worth? ‘We’re talking thousands of dollars, rather than hundreds,’ she said, pointing to a picture on the wall of a similar painting valued at $300,000, an abstract expressionist work by the Cobra school of painters. However, the painting was done by Gypsy the chimpanzee2. Others fooled apparently included a Sotheby’s agent and some leading Bond Street art galleries.
Does this show a human-like ability in a chimp? We think it shows the tremendous decline in standards of Western art. This has happened, logically, as people have more and more absorbed Darwinian thinking (chance is the creator—there are no absolute values).
The exquisite paintings of nature in the post-Reformation period reflected the intricate handiwork of the Creator, and expressed the creativity of man created in His image. When people began to see man as a meaningless product of chance processes, the beauty and integrity of art began to deteriorate.3 In some instances now, art looks more like chance processes have been at work!
References and notes
- Nicola Fyfe, who worked with the London auction house Bonhams, cited in ref. 2. Return to text.
- Gypsy’s brush with greatness, New Zealand Women’s Weekly, 27 May 1991. Return to text.
- The late evangelical philosopher, Francis Schaeffer, wrote extensively on this subject. Some of the typical ‘cubist’ pictures, for example, seem to reflect the disintegration of man’s view of himself, having been repeatedly told he is nothing more than a chance collection of atoms. Return to text.
Comments are automatically closed 14 days after publication.