Dystopian science

Part 1: Why the Bible enables science to work


by ,

Published: 28 March 2019 (GMT+10)

Imagine that humanity has emerged from the rubble of a nuclear holocaust. All the science textbooks are gone. Years have passed and many things have been forgotten. In many cases, we don’t know what’s true and what isn’t. Is the earth round or flat? Does the earth go around the sun, or is it the other way around? We don’t have access to any of the sources we would normally turn to with questions like this, and if we want to find out, we have to build the tools to do so from scratch. But as you stagger forward from the ruins of civilization, you’re not completely bereft of everything, because you’re still holding a Bible, and your thinking is shaped on a fundamental level by the culture that arose from it.

Can you rebuild modern science from this starting point? We ask this question because it mimics the situation many people find themselves in today. People with a natural tendency to think independently (which is generally a good thing!) can sometimes become entrenched in a radical skepticism that refuses to believe anything unless they can see and prove it for themselves. But one reason we need ‘authorities’ is that no single person can master every possible realm of knowledge. The attempt to prove everything by oneself is idiocentric (idios being the Greek word for ‘self’). In our attempt to rebuild science, we are going to need to reach outside ourselves and work with others, we are going to have to accumulate knowledge, perhaps over generations, and we will be forced to carefully document all findings.

However, this rebuilding would happen much more quickly than the original building, because we would be thinking with minds that are fundamentally shaped by biblical assumptions. The culture we initially came from has been influenced by the Bible in profound ways, so we are not starting with a blank slate.

First, we need theology

It might seem counter-intuitive, but before we get to science, we need theology. This is because it’s not enough to just have the Bible; we need to have a way of interpreting and reading it in its context to extract the meaning. You would get rudimentary theology very quickly. For example, people will read the Bible and see statements about there being one God, yet multiple Persons in the Godhead. This will allow them to come up again with the doctrine of the Trinity.

Because the Bible presents a God who is the Creator of the universe, who is intimately concerned with the Earth, who has interacted with the Earth often, and who reveals His nature through what is created, theologians would also eventually come up with the following two conclusions:

1. The earth is real, and our perceptions of it conform closely to reality.

Scripture states that God created the world (Genesis 1:1) and that He created human beings to have dominion over creation (Genesis 1:26), which means we have to study nature in order to best take care of what we have been given. Obviously, God must have given us the ability to reason and to learn so that we could fulfill our God-given purpose on earth. We are also told that creation bears witness to God’s power and divine nature (Romans 1:20). Beholding the glory of creation is meant to cause us to praise the Creator (Psalm 104). This also means that we must be able to generally perceive reality correctly.

These statements are critical. They are, in fact, the nucleus of the modern scientific revolution. We can know that the physical reality around us actually exists. We are not part of a computer simulation, the world is not an illusion (as many Eastern religions teach), and we are not plugged into the Matrix.

God created the world in such a way that it reflects His glory and provokes us to worship. This has always encouraged believers to study creation, in order to better understand and worship the Creator.

The earth is real, we have been told to study it, and we have been given the necessary mental tools to do so. So far so good.

At the same time, the Bible tells us that what we observe is not the entirety of reality. There is an entire spiritual realm that we do not directly experience with our senses, and to know about that, we are primarily dependent on God’s revelation about it in Scripture. The fact that there is ‘another’ world that cannot be explored with ‘science’ is a very important thing to remember. But the physical world is real, testable, and, as we are about to see, predictable.

2. Nature works in ways that are generally consistent.

Because God is the Creator, and since He is a God of order and not of chaos (e.g. James 1:17), we would expect creation to act in ways that are generally consistent. Would not the ultimate Lawgiver create a universe that operates according to Law? Most of the time nature acts in ways that are generally predictable, and that allows us to do science. If you drop a ball, it falls down, not up. Water boils at 100 degrees Celsius, always, and the minor deviations from that can easily be explained by appealing to differences in atmospheric pressure or the salinity of the water. You can float in water, but you can’t walk on it, unless it is frozen. And so on.

Nature is predictable because God has built the universe to act in a predictable way. And God did that because He operates in a predictable way. For example, by definition, He never does anything that contradicts His own nature. This is why we can express the patterns of the universe mathematically and in the form of the laws of physics, despite the occasional miracle, which, by definition, is a rare one-time event not accessible to scientific inquiry. The universe behaves according to a set of laws and follows the rules of logic because it derives from the ultimate source of law and logic, the God of the Bible. In fact, Jesus, who is the agent of creation, is called the Logos (the word from which we get the word logic) in John 1.

In the laboratory, the Christian can expect things to work according to their ‘natural’ way. We approach an experiment with confidence that there are not little pixies hiding among the test tubes or pushing buttons when we are not looking. We expect the universe to behave for us because it was created to behave. The Bible does not allow us to embrace complete methodological naturalism, however, because we’re told that God intervenes into and interacts with the creation in ways that transcend the normal order He set in place. So events like Creation, the Flood, and the miracles of Christ are not accessible to the same type of scientific inquiry because they aren’t explainable by the normal ‘laws of nature’.

Thus far we know that God is the Creator, that the creation should reflect His basic attributes of being predictable and orderly, and that we have been given what we need to study His works. We now have everything we need to start our exploration of science.

How does this apply when we’re thinking about the shape of the earth or whether we went to the moon? We’ll talk about that in Part 2. But for now, we can rest assured that the Bible gives us a foundation for saying that the universe is real, knowable, and accessible to scientific examination.

Helpful Resources

The Genesis Account
by Jonathan Sarfati
US $24.00
Mathematics: Is God Silent?
by James Nickel
US $24.00
Soft cover

Readers’ comments

Charles S.
Very interesting and "quotable content. Looking forward to Part 2.
Graham P.
Gian Carlo B.
Regarding the physicality of the world, the Bible also says that God created the universe through His speech, and since God is immaterial and information is also immaterial, necessarily following, all of reality is fundamentally immaterial, and that's what contemporary physics has found out. And that's what we would find out in the hypothetical dystopian world, even if we have to rediscover things from scratch, we would eventually rediscover Quantum Physics and we will eventually re-confirm the neo-Copehagen (Copehagen plus the von Neuman) interpretation. The leap that this leads to Eastern mysticism is absurd as quantum gravity researcher like Lee Smoolin, in his book "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity" points out that the best analogy for the history of the universe and what we find in digital physics is quantum information flow, so the world we experience, although different from the Initiator/Creator, it's fundamentally immaterial. This is also consistent with Biblical Creation since if information is the preceder and information flow is the fundamental aspect of nature, there is no problem in postulating that the Earth was first as the extended fabric of spacetime is an information construct coded by God's spoken word just like what we code and render in a computer program without recourse to pre-existent materials. So while our science forefathers may have held a sort of clockwork world, more uncovered knowledge has revealed that they were mistaken or at best, their interpretation needed fine tuning. As Max Planck and Heisenberg pointed out, that the mind is the matrix of all matter and that information and consciousness is fundamentally more real than matter itself. Thus materialism is dead, and substance dualism collapses to Keith Ward's Dual Aspect Idealism.
Antony jose A.
The above account appears to be a logical trap for atheists. Now on wards they cant take advantage of the internal contradictions, they used to do. it is clear that scripture is beyond the domain of internal contradictions. Hats off to the writer.
Mitch D.
A week, with rest on Sunday.
David B.
Well, science began in an environment that was based on the Bible to begin with, so why wouldn't it allow or help science to be re-built if lost? Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler... Newton... Faraday... GW Carver... many others believed in the Creator and sought His guidance.

It makes me so mad when I see people giving the Bible a bad name by blaming it for their ignorant Flat Earth ideas!

Comments are automatically closed 14 days after publication.