What does history say?

How should Christians respond to the growing popularity of Buddhism and the associated idea of reincarnation?

Most branches of science were founded by biblical creationists. Some skeptics claim that there was no evolutionary alternative.

Scientists say that a certain spot in the brain produces religious feeling; does that mean it’s all in our heads?

Misotheists like Dawkins attack creationist teachings, but give credence to wacky ideas like ‘Jesus never existed’ rejected by historians. Other antitheists like Bill Maher hold even wackier views, e.g. rejecting germ theory.

Being careful not to play into the opposition’s hands …

Could Noah’s Ark have been a giant coracle, as claimed by British Museum curator Irving Finkel in his translation of a Babylonian tablet?

Where they are not ignored, creationists are invariably disparaged and misrepresented.

Richard Dawkins says a rabbit fossil in the Precambrian would be evidence against evolution, but would that really be the case?

A Christian advocate of millions of years of death and ‘natural evil’ before Adam is challenged to answer the dilemma this poses, namely that it implies that the Creator God is a moral monster.

A brief response to anti-creationist books