Back to Topics
Page 2 of 2 (21 Articles)
Developmental genetics supports creation theory
Evolutionists try to define homology by how it is explained, not by how it is observed.
by Walter ReMine
Homology made simple
Does common anatomy necessarily point to common ancestry?
by Dominic Statham
Biology exam fraud
Fraudulent embryo drawings (a la Ernst Haeckel) said to provide evidence for evolution.
by Rocky Smart
Are look-alikes related?
What else could explain look-alikes?
by Don Batten
Ernst Haeckel
Ernst Haeckel perpetrated multiple frauds to promote evolution including his infamous embryo drawings.
by Russell Grigg
Did eyes evolve by Darwinian mechanisms?
Many kinds of eyes exist, but there is no progression of eye designs from simple to complex in the fossils. Even the simplest light-detecting cell requires enormously complicated coordinated biochemistry.
by Jerry Bergman
The human umbilical vesicle (‘yolk sac’) and pronephros—Are they vestigial?
A university lecturer teaches that the human umbilical vesicle (‘yolk sac’) and other temporary embryonic structures are vestigial—evidence that we evolved. Is this so?
by Andrew Lamb and Jonathan Sarfati
Saddle up the horse, it’s off to the bat cave
When genetic evidence fits the evolutionary belief system, humanists are quick to gloat. But what about when it totally contradicts it?
by Daniel Anderson
Examining evidence for evolution and deep time
Creation Magazine LIVE! Season 8 Episode 7 Examining evidence for evolution and deep time
by Richard Fangrad and Thomas Bailey