Explore
Biology
Back to Topics
Page 32 of 37 (441 Articles)
The carnivorous nature and suffering of animals
Detailed biblical evidence shows that animals eating, hurting and killing each other is incompatible with the original ’very good’ creation. Therefore carnivory must have begun after the Fall.
by Robert J. M. Gurney
Can it bee?
The brilliant design involved in bee flight is being studied for its potential in mini flying robots and more.
by Jonathan Sarfati
From ape to man via genetic meltdown: a theory in crisis
A review of Genetic Entropy & The Mystery of the Genome by John C. Sanford
by Royal Truman
Cows: a magnetic sign for evolutionists
Renowned evolutionist J.B.S. Haldane famously said that evolution could never produce mechanisms such as the wheel and magnet. He was right.
by David Catchpoole
Large scale function for ‘endogenous retroviruses’
We hope you enjoy this sneak preview from the now-released December issue of Journal of Creation. Subscribers will be delighted by the powerful, stimulating content.
by Shaun Doyle
Identification of species within the sheep-goat kind (Tsoan monobaramin)
Are sheep and goats part of the same original biblical kind?
by Jean K. Lightner
Surveillance solution: mimicking a bug’s eye view
Inspired by insect vision: new camera technology that can pick up detail in light and dark at the same time.
by David Catchpoole
Separating the sheep from the goats
Sheep and goats illustrate the limits of the created kinds and the inadequacy of mutations for evolution
by Jean Lightner
What About Horse Toe Evolution?
Evolutionists claim that various structures on the horse are evidence for ‘vestigial toes’. Let’s take a closer look.
by Rebekah L. Holt
Marvellous moth motif
An amazing portrait of a mammal’s face—on the wings of a moth—defies Darwinian explanations in its sheer detail.
by Emil Silvestru
Swedish trees older than the universe?
A closer look at a claim about the world’s oldest trees—allegedly older than the biblical date of creation.
by Carl Wieland
Peacock poppycock?
Darwin’s attempt to explain how the peacock’s tail evolved is being sharply criticized—by evolutionists.
by David Catchpoole