End-times and Early-times
Is the debate about how we should understand Genesis just like disputes about end-times prophecy (eschatology)?
Creation-Relevance
Back to Topics
The earth: how old does it look?
How old does the earth ‘look’ to you?
Vast, wide rock layers
Vast, wide rock layers and many other geological formations when examined are better explained by the global Flood rather than evolutionary geology.
Hugh Ross Church Fathers
What Hugh Ross used to say about the Church Fathers on Genesis, and why he had to retract (quietly).
‘Soft’ gap sophistry
Soft gappers claim Gen. 1:1–2 refers to creation of stars, galaxies and the matter of the earth, and v. 3–31 to forming and filling of earth billions of years later.
Should Genesis be taken literally?
How would the original readers have understood it?
More false claims by Hugh Ross
Hugh Ross makes excuses for ignoring Refuting Compromise, and claims that YECs have ignored A Matter of Days.
‘Same old’ vs fresh and new
Evolutionists keep committing the same old fallacies, while the creation paradigm inspires fresh discoveries.
Is Jesus Christ the Creator God?
Jesus’ miracles showed His power over creation—no need for evolution.
The Flood and the Bible
Simple explanation of globe-covering Flood in Genesis. God judged people’s wickedness, but showed mercy with His Ark design. Flood formed most rock layers and fossils, so no place for millions of years—so evolution is impossible!
Longwinded, sometimes interesting, and marred by evolutionary presuppositions
An attack on atheism hampered by adopting evolutionary assumptions
The universe isn’t old, it’s just tired!
The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that the entropy (disorder) of the universe increases through time.