The case against theistic evolution must not be silenced by claims that creationism brings the gospel into disrepute—on the contrary, the stakes are high and this is no time for surrender!

We hope you enjoy this sneak preview of an article from the soon-to-be-released Creation magazine. Subscribers will be delighted with the printed magazine’s powerful content and brilliant graphics.

What Hugh Ross used to say about the Church Fathers on Genesis, and why he had to retract (quietly).

Why does six-day creation matter? How can we refute old-earth compromisers?

Wheaton college professors write a series of books encouraging evangelicals to abandon the biblical understanding of Creation and the Flood as taught by Christ and the NT writers.

One objection to a global Flood is the thought that the wind that blew across the earth would be insufficient to dry the land. This is nonsense.

Old-earth creationists should face the reality that their position more aligns them with a worldview that opposes Christianity.

The literary framework approach to Genesis has become very popular among evangelical academics but there are many reasons why this belief is wrong.

High profile theistic evolutionist Karl Giberson reveals how it is not possible to be a Darwinist and a Bible-believing Christian—if one thinks about it.

The Sydney Anglicans are rightly respected for their stand on biblical authority. But a recent affiliated publication calls for seeing Genesis as ‘figurative’.

Clergyman and geologist Michael Roberts has thrown down the gauntlet to creationists with 10 provocative, and supposedly unanswerable questions about their ‘young Earth’ belief! (Part 1 of our answer).

An objection to a scale model of Noah’s Ark reveals the real reason so many people reject the Flood.