Difficult to believe that they are all wrong on the age of the earth
The Bible provides the foundations for the answers
dating-problems
Back to Topics
Carbon-14 in diamonds: Refuting Talk.Origins
Carbon-14 in Diamonds is still a problem for evolutionists.
DNA detected in duckbilled dino
More headaches for the ‘millions of years’ story
Radiometric backflip
The discovery of bird tracks in ‘Late Triassic’ rocks once again puts a big question mark over the veracity of long-age radiometric techniques
Why I’m finally a young-earth creationist
CMI’s Dr Jim Mason responds to Dr Luke Barnes’ Premier Christianity magazine article, “Why I’m no longer a young-earth creationist”
Oxidizable carbon ratio dating
What is it? And is it evidence against the Bible’s age of the earth?
Soft tissue preservation in a ‘Jurassic’ ichthyosaur
More evidence that fossils are better explained in the biblical timeframe
Sperm wail
The evolutionists’ cry that ostracod gametes are 17 million years old defies common sense.
More questions on the dating of Mount St Helens lava dome
See how they have been answered many times and understand the key concept to dismiss dating doubts
Dating Kabwe 1, the Broken Hill skull from Zambia
Why is Homo heidelbergensis so much younger than previously thought?
Paleozoic Corals and Lunar Recession
The growth rings in Paleozoic corals are often used to support the idea that the earth is very old, but the argument was flawed from the beginning.
Carbon 14—still drawing a blank
A CMI supporter writes in with a comment about the assumptions made behind the method of carbon 14 dating.