Explore
radio-carbon-dating
Back to Topics
Page 1 of 2 (18 Articles)
Diamonds: a creationist’s best friend
These brilliant and hard gems are almost pure carbon. Recent research shows they contain some radiocarbon. But since this should have all decayed in under a million years, how could the diamonds be billions of years old as evolutionists believe?
by Jonathan Sarfati
Carbon-14 dating—explained in everyday terms
Carbon-14 dating—explained in everyday terms
by Dr Carl Wieland
Radiometric dating breakthroughs
Radiometric dating breakthroughs
by Carl Wieland, Australia
Radioactive dating methods
Ways they make conflicting results tell the same story.
by Tas Walker
Radioactive ‘dating’ in conflict!
Tree trunks engulfed by molten lava couldn’t survive could they? Here’s evidence that they did!
by Andrew Snelling
Carbon dating into the future
Carbon–dating sometimes gives negative dates, i.e. dates for events that have not yet happened.
by Andrew Lamb
How old? When archaeology conflicts with the Bible.
Archaeologists discover a spear point “9000 years old”? But it’s far older than either the biblical date for the Flood or Creation. What is the answer to this?
by Gavin Cox
Dating of “oldest pottery” from China is based on assumptions
The evidence is consistent with biblical history.
by Tas Walker
Carbon-14 in diamonds: Refuting Talk.Origins
Carbon-14 in Diamonds is still a problem for evolutionists.
by Joel Tay
Dinosaur proteins and radiocarbon wreak ‘Jurassic World’ havoc
Collaborative creation research falsifies the evolutionary dates for the alleged ‘age of dinosaurs’.
by Brian Thomas
Time fears the pyramids?
How the Egyptian pyramids fit into the true biblical history
by Gavin Cox
C-14 dates and the HK ‘ark’ claim
Discrepant C-14 dates provide further skepticism of the recent claims to have found Noah’s Ark on Mt Ararat.
by Carl Wieland