Carl Wieland interviews Romanian geologist and world cave authority Dr Emil Silvestru

See how they have been answered many times and understand the key concept to dismiss dating doubts

Paleomagnetic measurements in archaeological material belonging to the time of the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem may well lead to accurately calibrating carbon-14 dating

Claimed dates for the Neolithic site Göbekli Tepe predate the Bible’s date of creation, and the Lost City of Dwarka supposedly predates the Flood—how should creationists respond?

How easy it seems to simply adjust an age that does not fit the evolutionary long-age narrative. Sometimes, there are no qualms about changing a ‘date’ by a billion years!

CMI’s Dr Jim Mason responds to Dr Luke Barnes’ Premier Christianity magazine article, “Why I’m no longer a young-earth creationist”

‘Earliest life’ fossils of Bicellum brasieri were buried by Noah’s Flood and not one billion years ago.

Long-age geologists will not accept a radiometric date unless it matches their pre-existing expectations.

If radiometric dating is objective science then why do researchers disagree so widely over the results?

Using the same philosophy (uniformitarianism) employed by evolutionists, the oceans fail to live up to old-earth expectations.

How the Egyptian pyramids fit into the true biblical history

More evidence that fossils are better explained in the biblical timeframe