Explore
Articles
Magazines
Store
Events
Media
Donate
Other Languages
SEARCH
Latest
Popular
Dating
Back to
Topics
Previous
Page
3
of
7
(77 Articles)
Next
Radio-dating in Rubble
The explosive eruption of Mt St Helens—observed in 1980, but according to so-called ‘reliable’ radioisotope methods, it happened
millions
of years ago!
by
Keith Swenson
Our steady sun: a problem for billions of years
The known physics of fusion poses problems for the supposed billions of years age of the sun.
by
Jonathan Sarfati
Dating in conflict
Analysis of wood samples from Tertiary rocks yielded significant carbon-14 indicating the wood was only thousands of years old, not millions.
by
Hansruedi Stutz
How old? When archaeology conflicts with the Bible.
Archaeologists discover a spear point “9000 years old”? But it’s far older than either the biblical date for the Flood or Creation. What is the answer to this?
by
Gavin Cox
Diamonds—Are they
really
all that old?
A pristine, unfossilized wooden log has recently been found in ‘ancient’ diamond-bearing rock
by
Jonathan O'Brien
Nuclear physicist Dr van der Ventel embraces biblical creation
Dr Jonathan Sarfati interviews Dr Brandon van der Ventel.
by
Jonathan Sarfati
More on radioactive dating problems
A further response to Reasonable Faith Adelaide.
by
Jim Mason
Dating of “oldest pottery” from China is based on assumptions
The evidence is consistent with biblical history.
by
Tas Walker
Is Young-Earth Creationism a heresy?
An anticreationist attacks biblical creation as heresy, although biblical heresy is an oxymoron. The response also refutes a common argument about the absence of short-lived isotopes, beloved of atheists and progressive creationists, and answers some alleged biblical contradictions.
by
Jonathan Sarfati
Worldviews, logic, and earth’s age—part 1
Old-earth creationists should face the reality that their position more aligns them with a worldview that opposes Christianity.
by
John K. Reed and Shaun Doyle
Difficult to believe that they are all wrong on the age of the earth
The Bible provides the foundations for the answers
by
The Team at CMI
Evolutionist debater fails to understand young-earth arguments
A young supporter asks some questions about young-earth evidence raised by an evolutionary debater. The response points out some of the evolutionist’s misunderstandings and even outright errors, and the role of axioms in the debate.
by
Jonathan Sarfati
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
200K+
INFObyters
10.6K+
FEEDERS
6k+
FOLLOWERS
84K+
FANS
17K+
FOLLOWERS
2M+
YOUTUBE VIEWS
Change Settings
Change Country
-- Loading --
City / Postal Code
Why?
Change Language
-- Loading --
Loading...