A closer look at a claim about the world’s oldest trees—allegedly older than the biblical date of creation.

These brilliant and hard gems are almost pure carbon. Recent research shows they contain some radiocarbon. But since this should have all decayed in under a million years, how could the diamonds be billions of years old as evolutionists believe?

An anticreationist attacks biblical creation as heresy, although biblical heresy is an oxymoron. The response also refutes a common argument about the absence of short-lived isotopes, beloved of atheists and progressive creationists, and answers some alleged biblical contradictions.

A young supporter asks some questions about young-earth evidence raised by an evolutionary debater. The response points out some of the evolutionist’s misunderstandings and even outright errors, and the role of axioms in the debate.

Does Carbon Dating Prove Millions of Years?

A study of Stone Mountain granite samples raises more questions than answers.

Carbon-14 dating—explained in everyday terms

Millions of years and the 'doctrine of Balaam'

The known physics of fusion poses problems for the supposed billions of years age of the sun.