This commonly asked question has wider implications when the origin of life is considered.

How do we interpret the latest Homo naledi findings with their associated ‘ape-man’ connotations and claims?

If evolution is true, why are many human behaviours anti-evolutionary?

Genetics: Death knell for ape-human evolution?

Homo naledi is another case of selective interpretation of the evidence to ‘prove’ evolution of man from apelike ancestors.

Despite mounting evidence that the bones of a claimed human ancestor are in fact an extinct ape, evolutionists won’t give up on a prized ‘missing link’.

Evolutionists who linked human brain size to intelligence have had to change their story.

Chimps and humans have similar genomes, right? Wrong! Just look at the Y chromosome.

How a missionary family gave rise to the top name in ‘apeman’ research!

The existence of radically different evolutionary scenarios of human origins shows that human evolution is no ‘fact’ but an exercise in storytelling.

For decades, ‘Lucy’ has been anthropology’s favourite ‘pin-up’ example of evolutionary transition from apes to humans. But she’s just been ignominiously dumped.

This fossil type is widely touted as our ancestor. The discovery of an extremely well-preserved specimen focuses attention on the evidence that things are not what evolutionists would have hoped.