Having your cake, and eating it
Evolution is often claimed to explain something and its opposite, so it certainly should not be called science, rather an unfalsifiable ideology!
theory-of-evolution
Back to Topics
From the mouths of sceptics
“From the horse’s mouth”—one has to smile when evolutionary scientists unintentionally provide strong confirmation of the views of those ‘pesky’ creationists!
Unmasking natural selection
A review of ‘40 Years of Evolution: Darwin’s finches on Daphne Major Island’ by Peter and Rosemary Grant.
Peacock ‘eyes’ that hypnotize
When the peacock vibrates its colourful fan of tail feathers, the ‘eyespots’ behave differently from the rest of the feathery background, leaving the peahen mesmerized.
Hybridization shaking up the evolutionary Tree of Life—what does it mean for creationists?
Hybridization occurs in the wild more than evolutionists thought. What does this mean for biblical creation?
Neutral Model, genetic drift and the Third Way—a synopsis of the self-inflicted demise of the evolutionary paradigm
Neo-Darwinism, Neutral evolution, and the 'Extended Evolutionary Synthesis' cannot avoid the multilayered complexity of the genome and cell.
Evolutionists disagree on how evolution happens
There is more than one view among evolutionary researchers on how new biological structures arise.
Creation in independent schools
Under the guise of protecting school pupils against indoctrination, hypocritical moves are afoot to propagate scientific materialism.
Two trees, one root: the link between evolutionism and Eastern spirituality
How two philosophies both lead people away from God.
Developmental genetics supports creation theory
Evolutionists try to define homology by how it is explained, not by how it is observed.
Tall molars did not evolve from eating grass
Some scientists connect changes in the grasses that animals ate and the development of teeth.
Wishful thinking about nature’s abilities
Many believers in nature’s capacity for evolutionary innovation think the sky’s the limit—yet their allegedly ‘naturalistic science’ writings betray a faith in the abilities of ‘Nature’ that borders on paganism.