The teaching of biological evolution in science classes amounts to the teaching of a materialistic religion based on arguments that lack scientific merit.

The origin of life remains a vexed problem for those who would like to be rid of God the Creator.

Attempts to dismiss creation as ‘religious’ do not stack up logically.

Marxism is still influencing contemporary legal thinkers, but what sort of society will law without God lead to?

When the arguments used to support evolution are examined, how many actually pass muster?

Ernst Haeckel perpetrated multiple frauds to promote evolution including his infamous embryo drawings.

Spencer is most (in)famous for applying survival of the fittest to human society—the strongest and fittest should flourish, while the weak and unfit should die!

Evolutionists’ own criteria for identifying a ‘pseudoscience’ show that evolution itself is a pseudoscience.

If you thought Darwin’s Origin was original, think again!

America’s National Science Education Standards specifies certain criteria as to what constitutes scientific knowledge. How does evolution rate?

Far from the theory of evolution being derived from facts that speak for themselves, it is actually rooted in the philosophical concept of atheism.

Are scientists guilty of using language that serves to distort or disguise the facts?