Refuting Evolution 2 chapter 9: Argument: Probability of evolution

Please advice ‘teaser’

Despite one historian’s attempt to rehabilitate Haeckel, it turns out his fraud was worse than originally thought.

Not original to Darwin but the revival of an ancient idea.

Where they are not ignored, creationists are invariably disparaged and misrepresented.

Chimps and humans have similar genomes, right? Wrong! Just look at the Y chromosome.

Refuting Evolution 2 chapter 12: Argument: Evolution of mankind

The papers are full of “Ardipithecus” or “Ardi”—many would not realize it’s just a lot more detail on the same creature we wrote about in 2001.

Might it actually be evidence for design?

The origin of the first living organism is a huge problem for materialists. Agnostic DB of California agrees that creationist critiques are strong, but argues that ribozyme ‘evolution’ might solve the problem; Dr Sarfati responds.

As with all so-called ‘missing link’ finds, the difference between what the media tells us and real story is considerable.

The papers are full of the usual hype that a definite and crucially important human ancestor has been found. But a closer look reveals more of the ‘same old-same-old’.