Human error shows scientists are just as prone to making mistakes as anyone else

Taking apart the argument that says consciousness, rather than being a product of the supernatural soul, emerges from the complex physical structure of our brains

David Attenborough fails in his attempt to refute the Genesis account of creation with his account of the Darwinian tree of life.

Evolution relies on deep time which in turn relies on naturalism but science tells us the earth is young and so evolution is false.

How two philosophies both lead people away from God.

Theistic evolutionists at BioLogos make a vain attempt to sidestep Jesus’ teaching on the age of the earth.

I couldn’t help but note your shade of melanin.

Many kinds of eyes exist, but there is no progression of eye designs from simple to complex in the fossils. Even the simplest light-detecting cell requires enormously complicated coordinated biochemistry.

Evolution does not explain human language or consciousness, which is a serious problem for naturalism and atheism.

The results of an investigation into human footprints has brought conclusions that are out of step with evolutionary orthodoxy.

The controversial theory with a long history of competing concepts that is no closer to being resolved than it was in Darwin’s day.

Evolutionists try to define homology by how it is explained, not by how it is observed.