How do we interpret the latest Homo naledi findings with their associated ‘ape-man’ connotations and claims?

The notion that petrification processes take thousands of years blown out of the water in a matter of weeks.

Further study of a previously-decreed ‘simple’ and ‘early’ fossil forest shows more complexity than assumed.

The discovery of bird tracks in ‘Late Triassic’ rocks once again puts a big question mark over the veracity of long-age radiometric techniques

Homo naledi is another case of selective interpretation of the evidence to ‘prove’ evolution of man from apelike ancestors.

Richard Dawkins says a rabbit fossil in the Precambrian would be evidence against evolution, but would that really be the case?

Dinosaur dioramas in museums and children’s books on dinosaurs should now include flowers.

How can Noah’s Flood explain it?

Bill Nye’s claim that there are no out-of-order fossils puts a bullseye on a weak spot for evolution.

Reliable indicators of age in the rocks?

How can something long known to be living, be dubbed a ‘living fossil’?

A fossil skull found with dinosaurs is identical to a modern American alligator, but was given a different scientific name, giving the illusion of evolution.