Time—no friend of evolution
‘Millions of years’ don’t help—in fact they make it worse.
mutations
Back to Topics
Responses to our 15 Questions: part 3
Our 15 Questions for Evolutionists has sparked many responses from evolutionists
and skeptics attempting to answer. We’ve compiled many of the answers that
we’ve received, along with our refutations.
Responses to our 15 Questions: part 1
Our 15 Questions for Evolutionists pamphlet has sparked many responses
from evolutionists and skeptics attempting to answer.
Ancon sheep: just another loss mutation
Darwin used them as evidence for evolution but they are just another loss mutation—evidence of Creation and the Fall.
Plant geneticist: ‘Darwinian evolution is impossible’
Ground-breaking research shows that evolution by mutations and natural selection just does not work.
Can’t drink milk? You’re “normal”!
For years, lactose intolerance was regarded as abnormal.
Are ‘gain of function’ mutations really downhill and so not supporting
of evolution?
A researcher questions the generalization of the findings of research on ‘gain-of-function’
mutations in the thyroid hormone system, claiming an example of new, information-gaining
mutations.
From ape to man via genetic meltdown: a theory in crisis
A review of Genetic Entropy & The Mystery of the Genome by John C. Sanford
Does gene duplication provide the engine for evolution?
There are a number of problems with evolution by gene duplication and mutation.
Gain-of-function mutations: at a loss to explain molecules-to-man evolution
Mutations are supposedly the raw material for evolution. Most are harmful or neutral.
But even mutations that result in new functions are really informationally downhill,
because they cause loss of specificity.
No flies on ‘freak’ sheep
A ‘handy’ mutation in sheep could revolutionize the Australian woolgrowing industry. But it’s not evolution.
At last, a good mutation?