The origin of the first living organism is a huge problem for materialists. Agnostic DB of California agrees that creationist critiques are strong, but argues that ribozyme ‘evolution’ might solve the problem; Dr Sarfati responds.

There’s more to reality than naturalism can fathom …

Understanding the difference between what opposing theories predict helps to discriminate between them and thus avoid useless arguments.

Do we need to know how miracles happen to know if they happen?

As we look at the foundations of the ‘billions of years’ historical framework, are the foundations rock or sand?

Some academics claim that mathematics could be racist, and that there is such a thing as ‘white math’.

A review of The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science by Peter Harrison

A skeptic gives advice about how to debate creationists, but he unwittingly shows the religious nature of his position.

Is God forced to be loving by his nature?

An atheist correspondent asserts that Christian belief in God stems from a desire for a Heavenly Father to take care of us, but his argument commits a major logical fallacy.

It’s irrational to think there is such a thing as ‘free energy’ in the universe.

Scientific and biblical illiteracy enables so-called ‘experts’ to confuse church leaders about God and creation.