A review of The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science by Peter Harrison

Atheists say that the universe and life began with no adequate cause, contradicting rationality.

The Bible provides all the necessary assumptions, but atheistic evolution can’t.

An atheist correspondent asserts that Christian belief in God stems from a desire for a Heavenly Father to take care of us, but his argument commits a major logical fallacy.

A Christian says he’s tired of the creation-evolution debate. Dr Don Batten explains its importance, documents how it has helped people come to Christ, and cites biblical encouragement for the weary.

Evolutionists’ own criteria for identifying a ‘pseudoscience’ show that evolution itself is a pseudoscience.

A critic disputes that a biblical foundation is necessary for ethics. The response shows why it is, and points out the real ethical problem for atheists.

The origin of the first living organism is a huge problem for materialists. Agnostic DB of California agrees that creationist critiques are strong, but argues that ribozyme ‘evolution’ might solve the problem; Dr Sarfati responds.

Psychologist Dr Julia Shaw says our society is ‘post-fact’, and she’s fine with that!

Scientists say that a certain spot in the brain produces religious feeling; does that mean it’s all in our heads?

Can creationists be scientists?

Loving God with all your mind: logic and creation