How much can science tell us about God, the universe, and the nature of nothing?

However trustworthy our minds are, naturalistic evolution struggles to know itself.

A response to the environmentalists’ rewilding agenda, which would devalue people and diminish the quality of human life. Far better, the biblical approach involves stewardship, and respect for creation.

Can 'Maxwell’s Demon' avoid an intelligent origin for life?

A review of Science Without God? by Peter Harrison and Jon H. Roberts (Eds.)

Should compelling naturalistic explanations be enough for Bible-believing Christians to give up their convictions? If so, what about atheists who, by definition, rule out the supernatural?

Sir David Attenborough is a highly accomplished man, but wrong about things like God’s existence and evolution; what about environmental and climate issues?

Scientism is bunk. But how do we integrate Scripture and science?

Historically, humanism had noble roots in Christian academia, but post-Reformation, through Unitarian influence, humanism’s biblical foundations were eroded and replaced by secular thinking based on evolution.

A conversation that never happened.

A reader asks—if memories are stored in the brain, what basis is there for belief in the soul?

Laudable conservation efforts are predicated on the belief that nature shouldn’t change over time, but this doesn’t sit well with the prevalent evolutionary belief that nature does change over time.