Is evolution pseudoscience?
Evolutionists’ own criteria for identifying a ‘pseudoscience’ show that evolution itself is a pseudoscience.
Philosophy
Back to Topics
Dawkins and Eugenics
Prominent Darwinist and anti-Christian, Professor Richard Dawkins, says he hates
to be agreeing with Hitler on the point, but applying eugenics to breeding humans
is a pretty good idea after all.
Cheating with chance
Why analogies like the lottery and rare poker hands don’t rebut the miniscule chance of abiogenesis.
Fibre optics in eye demolish atheistic ‘bad design’ argument
Is our eye harmed by ‘backward wiring’? No! Not only is it necessary,
but eyes have a fibre optic plate to guide light through the nerve net to receptors.
The alleged ‘backwardly wired’ retina versus Dawkins
Dawkins’ latest book The Greatest Show on Earth purports to provide
the proof of evolution. A new discovery further vindicates our refutation, The Greatest
Hoax on Earth?
Could monkeys type the 23 Psalm?
No, not even if time was infinite. Read why.
Bomb-building vs. the biblical foundation
A critic disputes that a biblical foundation is necessary for ethics. The response shows why it is, and points out the real ethical problem for atheists.
Müller cells refuting Dawkins: feedback
Many atheopaths are reeling from the demolition of their hero Dawkins by the new
Müller cell discoveries in the eye.
‘That’s nice for you, but it’s not for me’
Is there such a thing as absolute truth?
Nietzsche
The evolutionist who was anti-God and anti-Darwin
Dawkins and Design
Some atheists like Richard Dawkins might accept a designer—as long as it is aliens not the biblical God.
How religiously neutral are the anti-creationist organisations?
The NCSE is vehemently opposed to Christians who believe the Biblical account of history, from the beginning. Is that ‘religiously neutral’?