Many believers in nature’s capacity for evolutionary innovation think the sky’s the limit—yet their allegedly ‘naturalistic science’ writings betray a faith in the abilities of ‘Nature’ that borders on paganism.

The Bible is the supreme authority in all it teaches. All else, and particularly human conjecture, is subordinate to and corrected by the written Word of God.

Evolution is often claimed to explain something and its opposite, so it certainly should not be called science, rather an unfalsifiable ideology!

What is it? Is it a real fallacy? How do we respond?

The New York Times released an opinion piece recently that perfectly illustrates how evolutionists cannot live consistently with their worldview.

A frequent claim repeated by skeptics: “Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.” Let’s investigate this claim.

A reader asks—if memories are stored in the brain, what basis is there for belief in the soul?

National Geographic’s ideas about the origin of life merely masquerade as science. Yet they say creationists are at war with science?!

Is the famous residence of Charles Darwin a science museum or a shrine that propagates a secular, godless worldview?

In wrestling with the overwhelming evidence of design around us, atheists propose explanations somewhere beyond this world; even in imagined other universes.

The James Webb space telescope will be able to examine the atmospheres of exoplanets in greater clarity than ever before. Will we find a truly habitable exoplanet?

Answering the claim that morality can arise through a naturalistic evolutionary process.