How should we respond when amoral atheism feels easy to believe?

Are atheists really gentle homebodies in the ‘quiet middle’? Or are they actually rabid provocateurs at the noisy extreme?

There was a time when one of the world’s coldest and iciest regions was much warmer.

Contrary to the tired old mantra, ‘science has disproved the Bible’, biblical literate and scientifically informed Christians can (and should) proclaim creation with well-founded confidence.

Evolution, it is claimed, removes the need for a designing intelligence of life on Earth, but this amounts to the logically absurd proposition of ‘Unintelligent Design’.

When the American Atheists convention was told “I’m a pastor currently serving a Methodist church … and I am an atheist”, the crowd hooted and clapped for over a minute.

Where can you get information to tackle head-on the Skeptics’ supposed ‘objections to design’?

The New York Times released an opinion piece recently that perfectly illustrates how evolutionists cannot live consistently with their worldview.

How should we respond to Australia’s current bushfire situation?

A skeptic overlooks the fact that God has made Himself known to us in various ways when he claims that He treats humans unfairly.

Whatever the reality of the current gloomy climate predictions, the current bandwagon is such that some have even compared normal scientific scepticism to terrorism.

A campaign organized by the British Humanist Association, of 46 leading scientists and organizations, is pressuring the Welsh Government to ban creation in Welsh schools