Respondents take CMI to task over the tone of our ‘Wolf among the fold?’ article.

Australian science personality Dr Karl Kruszelnicki takes creationists to task over transitional forms. Are his criticisms valid?

Some pro-abortionist philosophers advance arguments of which even most pro-abort politicians are unaware. But they are important to answer, as the culture moves further from sanctity of innocent human life.

Who is Satan, when did he fall and why, and what is his part in our sin? What did the subsequent Fall of mankind change?

The hype associated with this latest evolutionary claim is way out of kilter with the reality. The excitement just shows how little evidence there is for molecules-to-man evolution.

Have they really found fossil sea cows with legs instead of flippers?

How can creationists explain evidence indicating that some ancient people lived in caves and used stone tools?

A critic suggests that Genesis 1–11 was written in the genre of myth rather than as a literal historical account. How do we know it’s not myth?

Says that science and religion are incompatible … or was that compatible? See why they are confused.

A critic misrepresents a recent creation talk in Singapore. The response explains our aims in church talks and our materials, and refutes the critic’s errors in facts and logic.

Geological Society of London geologists are not enthused about defending their long-age views in public.

A reader questions whether the curse on Eve was more about the anguish of raising children