One reader queries CMI’s logic re ET and the Curse; another queries our use of the term ‘long-age Christian’.

Many atheopaths are reeling from the demolition of their hero Dawkins by the new Müller cell discoveries in the eye.

An alternative religious belief is spawned by popular culture. A critic engages CMI without necessarily realizing the root of such beliefs.

A correspondent thinks billions of years is more appropriate as an analogy to God’s timelessness. Our response shows why this is flawed.

A correspondent says we should ignore the atheists—and also claims that we are making a fundamental error in relation to the Bible.

How should we respond when tourist guides tell us things are millions of years old?

Christianity passes the test with flying colours.

The skeptic’s objection that Eve should not have been punished—as she could not have known right from wrong—is easily answered.

Readers challenge CMI about the likelihood of monkeys being able to type the 23^rd Psalm.

Could the ancestors of Australopithecus sediba have been on the Ark? Also, what do we do about ‘Adam’s rib’, given online contradictory claims about the capacity of ribs to regenerate?

Because a tiny number of people have genuine biological gender identity issues, such as being hermaphrodite, does not mean that homosexual practices should be legitimized.

A correspondent claims that our article on fish-to-tetrapod evolution is bad science.