Round two versus a theistic evolutionist who objected to being grouped with the ‘useful idiots’ who help the atheistic cause with their compromise. Objective biblical exegesis trumps postmodern eisegesis.

Do creationists have to resort to secular ideas to explain them?

Dr Jonathan Sarfati answers questions ranging from ‘caveman’ diets to plant evolution.

Most of the responses to our correspondence with the compromising chaplain were positive. Here we respond to the only one who disagreed.

Do either have a place?

How do we decide between different flood models?

The folly of theologians favouring the ‘science of the day’ over biblical foundations.

Do recent reports of ‘missing matter’ being found have anything to do with the elusive ‘dark matter’? Plus: how to handle atheopathic pressure on the Internet.

Does parthenogenesis in lizards mean that some lizards only had one gender on Noah’s Ark?

A correspondent claims that CMI’s articles are demeaning to women; we respond.

Some Christians think that watering down what the Bible says in Genesis makes it easier to reach unbelievers. Does it really?

A skeptic misunderstands what evolution is, and what is required to make it plausible.