Radiometric Dating Questions and Answers
- How accurate is Carbon-14 (and other radiometric) dating? (From The Creation Answers Book)
- The way it really is: little-known facts about radiometric dating (available in Spanish)
- Radioactive dating methods
What is radiocarbon dating? Is it accurate?
- Diamonds: a creationist’s best friend: Radiocarbon in diamonds: enemy of billions of years
- DNA research says Australian Aborigines arrived 50,000 years ago
- Oxidizable carbon ratio dating
- Dating in conflict
- Dating dilemma: fossil wood in ‘ancient’ sandstone
- Geological conflict: young radiocarbon date for ancient fossil wood challenges fossil dating
- The dating game
- Radiocarbon in diamonds: enemy of billions of years
- Tree ring dating (dendrochronology) (available in Spanish)
Are there examples of inaccurate results obtained from the potassium/argon dating method (the most cited method)?
- Radioactive ‘dating’ failure: recent New Zealand lava flows yield ‘ages’ of millions of years
- Excess argon within mineral concentrates from the new dacite lava dome at Mt St Helens volcano
- Radio-dating in rubble
- The pigs took it all
- How do you date a New Zealand volcano?
How can the radiometric dates of millions and billions of years old be so wrong?
- Trial balloons and the age of the earth
- The failure of U-Th-Pb ‘dating’ at Koongarra
- Flaws in dating the earth as ancient
- Conflicting ‘ages’ of Tertiary basalt and contained fossilised wood, Crinum, Central Queensland, Australia
- Radioactive ‘dating’ in conflict!
- National Geographic magazine joins the dating game
- Is the absence of short-lived radionuclides a problem for the biblical timescale?
- Evolutionist debater fails to understand young-earth arguments
- The Oklo natural reactors in Precambrian rocks, Gabon, Africa
Is there any evidence that the radioactive decay rate might not have been constant?
- RATE group reveals exciting break-through!
- Billion-fold acceleration of radioactivity demonstrated in laboratory
- Radioactive decay rate depends on chemical environment
- Helium evidence for a young world continues to confound critics
- Argon diffusion data support RATE’s 6,000-year helium age of the earth
What is the current creationist thinking on radiohalos (formerly called ‘pleochroic halos’)?
- Radiohalos: startling evidence of catastrophic geologic processes on a young earth
- The collapse of geologic time
- New radiohalo find challenges primordial granite claim
- New record of polonium radiohalos, Stone Mountain granite, Georgia (USA)
Refuting Evolution has sold over 500,000 copies! Impressive? But Richard Dawkins’ God Delusion has sold 8.5 million copies. Please support CMI so we can get more of this information out. Support this site