Do we need to know how miracles happen to know if they happen?

Many believers in nature’s capacity for evolutionary innovation think the sky’s the limit—yet their allegedly ‘naturalistic science’ writings betray a faith in the abilities of ‘Nature’ that borders on paganism.

Understanding the difference between what opposing theories predict helps to discriminate between them and thus avoid useless arguments.

When scientists—particularly physicists—look at the universe and rule out the Creator, it inevitably leads them down a dark path to confusion.

If our minds were undesigned, accidental byproducts of evolution, why would we trust them?

A naturalistic view of origins must explain the existence of coded information within living things arising from a ‘no mind’ process, but all of our scientific observations deny that possibility.

What is agnosticism? And how can Christians respond to it?

Richard Dawkins says a rabbit fossil in the Precambrian would be evidence against evolution, but would that really be the case?

Deep-time compromise has had a negative effect on the Christian church despite claims to the contrary.

What does history say?

When the arguments used to support evolution are examined, how many actually pass muster?

Rotten from the roots to the fruits.