This article is from
Journal of Creation 21(3):1–2, December 2007
Browse our latest digital issue Subscribe
Journal of Creation 21(3):1–2, December 2007
Browse our latest digital issue Subscribe
Journal of Creation archive > Volume 21 Issue 3
Journal of Creation
Volume 21, Issue 3
Published December 2007
127 pages
Click here to subscribe to the Journal of Creation
Click on the PDF icons below to view any of these articles as a PDF in a new window. You can save the PDF to your computer from there or right click on the icon below and click on ‘save target as’ (or similar).
Contents:
Page |
Title |
3–5 | Fossil embryos deep in the fossil record Perspective by Michael J. Oard |
5–6 | Big birdosaur blues: new fossil creates problems for dino-to-bird evolution (Pre-publication) Perspective by Shaun Doyle |
6–8 | Naracoorte Caves: an archive in the dark Perspective by Emil Silvestru |
8–11 | Katrina’s splay deposits: a small example of the power of flowing water Perspective by Tas Walker |
11–12 | Feathery flight of fancy: alleged ‘protofeathers’ fail under close scrutiny Perspective by Shaun Doyle |
12–14 | Migrating planets and migrating theories Perspective by Wayne Spencer |
15–16 | Evolutionary origin of life even more difficult Perspective by Michael J. Oard |
17 | No more love for Lucy? (Pre-publication version) Perspective by Ryan Jaroncyk |
18 | Terrible lizards trapped by terrible Flood Perspective by Tas Walker |
19–23 | Astronomical troubles for the astronomical hypothesis of ice ages Overview by Michael J. Oard |
24–26 | Evidence for turtle evolution Overview Jerry Bergman and Wayne Frair |
27–31 | Florid forensic fable A review of The Making of the Fittest: DNA and the Ultimate Forensic Record of Evolution by Sean B. Carroll Book Review by Alex Williams |
32–36 | Still discontent A review of Darwinism and Its Discontents by Michael Ruse Book Review by Lael Weinberger |
37–43 | Sloppy, lazy and dishonest A review of Science and Faith: Friends or Foes? by C. John Collins Book Review by Andrew Kulikovsky |
44–46 | Strong case, but flawed by compromise A review of The Case for a Creator by Lee Strobel Book Review by Lita Sanders |
47–52 | String Theory—causing a disturbance of cosmic proportions A review of The Cosmic Landscape by Leonard Susskind Book Review by Mary Beth De Repentigny |
52–54 | A pathetic case for an old earth A review of A Biblical Case for an Old Earth by David Snoke Book Review by Lita Sanders |
55–57 | The HAR1F gene: a Darwinian paradox Countering the Critics Article by Peer Terborg and Royal Truman |
58–60 | The Flood/post-Flood boundary Letter to the Editor by Max J. Hunter. Reply: Michael Oard |
60–61 | WMAP ‘noisy’ data? Letter to the Editor by James Upton |
61 | Biblical chronology—our times are in his hands Letter to the Editor by Larry Pierce. Reply: Mike Viccary |
61–62 | The problems of traditional chronology Letter to the Editor by Rod Bernitt |
62–66 | ‘Short’ sojourn comes up short? Letter to the Editor by Brenton Minge. Replies: Mike Viccary and David Austin |
66–68 | Pioneer anomaly: still unsolved? Letter to the Editor by James Upton. Reply: Russell Humphreys |
68 | Tidal considerations Letter to the Editor by Jack C. Sofield. Reply: JoC Editors |
69–76 | Days 1–4 Viewpoint by Frank DeRemer, Mark Amunrud and Delmar Dobberpuhl |
77–83 | Life’s irreducible structure—Part 2: naturalistic objections Paper by Alex Williams |
84–92 | Genetic code optimisation: Part 2 Paper by Royal Truman and Peer Terborg |
93–101 | On literary theorists’ approach to Genesis 1: Part 2 Paper by Marc Kay |
102–110 | Haeckel: legacy of fraud to popularise evolution Paper by Pauli J. Ojala and Matti Leisola |
111–117 | Astonishing DNA complexity demolishes neo-Darwinism Paper by Alex Williams |
118–127 | Why the shared mutations in the Hominidae exon X GULO pseudogene are not evidence for common descent Paper by Royal Truman and Peer Terborg |
Readers’ comments
Comments are automatically closed 14 days after publication.