Share
A- A A+

Article from:

Creation  Volume 28Issue 2 Cover

Creation 28(2):28–32
March 2006

Free Email News
Creation magazine print - 1 yr new subn


US $25.00
View Item
The Creation Answers Book
by Various

US $14.00
View Item

Evolution of the rhinoceros? Preposterous!

By Jeffrey Dykes and David Catchpoole

The Rhinoceros—what a name, and what an animal! The name comes from two Greek words: ρίς/ρίνος (rhis/rhinos) meaning ‘nose’ and κέρας (keras) meaning ‘horn’. With their horns and their imposing size, rhinos are a sight to behold. Weighing around 3,600 kg (8,000 lb)1, the rhinoceros is the second largest land animal after the elephant—with the hippopotamus third.

Photo by Paul Salmon

African rhinos look smooth-skinned

African rhinos look smooth-skinned, while in Asian species the skin hangs down in heavy folds. This is so pronounced in the Indian rhinoceros that the plate-like folds give the appearance of armour. What’s more, the skin is covered with tubercles, hard lumps that superficially look like rivets in the ‘armour’.

Very little can withstand the force of a charging rhino. Railroad locomotives have been attacked by rhinos and even derailed!2 (A group of rhinos is sometimes called a ‘crash’—which seems apt!) Despite their great bulk and ‘stubby’ legs, they can run faster than an Olympic sprinter—incredibly, the black rhino can reach speeds of up to 55 km/hr (35 mph).3

Rhinos use their horns for sparring with each other, digging for edible plants, and for defense (all rhinos are vegetarian). Indian and Javan rhinos have a single horn; the Sumatran (or hairy) rhino, and the African white and black rhinos have two. But unlike the ‘true horns’ of cattle and goats, which have a core of bone and are attached to the skeletal structure, rhino horn is made of densely-packed keratin fibres—the same substance as our fingernails and hair.

Rhinos are said to have poor eyesight, but an excellent sense of smell. Their ears can swivel independently of each other and can pick up the faintest sounds from any direction. Their three-toed feet are large (which helps to spread the load they carry), and leave a characteristic three-lobed footprint much like an ace of clubs. As in other heavyweight mammals like elephants and hippos, rhinoceros legs are almost straight—the ideal anatomy to prevent buckling when the animal is standing.

Courtesy of Oriental-arms Daggers

Probably the biggest threat to the rhino is poaching for its horn. Traditionally, processed rhino horn has been believed to cure a range of maladies. However, today’s demand is largely from Arab buyers in Yemen wanting rhino horn for elaborately-carved dagger handles—a symbol of status and wealth in that country.

Did the rhino evolve?

The rhinoceros is routinely described as a ‘prehistoric’ beast that has inhabited the earth for ‘millions of years’. But such language presumes evolution is true,4 and that rhinos are descendants of the first mammals to have evolved hooves (such as cattle and sheep). Evolutionists say that the horse and the tapir are the rhino’s closest relatives—all are assigned to the perissodactyls, or ‘odd-toed ungulates’ (ungulate means ‘hoofed animal’). Evolutionists believe that perissodactyls preceded the artiodactyls, the ‘even-toed ungulates’, which include animals as diverse as the deer, pig, camel and hippopotamus.

If evolution were true, one would expect to find numerous transitional forms in the fossil record, linking the presumed common ancestor to all these animals. But where are they? Such con­jecture—and that is what evolution is—does not bear up under scrutiny. Evolutionists themselves warn of the lack of evidence for evolution of the horse—supposedly a close relative of the rhino, and long paraded as a textbook ‘proof’ of evolution—in the words of one leading evolutionist, the textbook story is ‘lamentable’,5 and the previous 50 species have been reduced to two.6,7 And what of the rhino’s unique ‘horn’—it is not the bony structure of its supposed cattle and antelope relatives, but is made essentially of tightly wound hair. To say that these diverse life forms have evolved from a common ancestor is basically a statement of faith, not reality.

So if rhinos aren’t the result of evolution, where did they come from?

Rhinos and the Bible

If one starts from the standpoint that the Bible is a reliable historical record and worldview, then things ‘rhino’ begin to make sense—when viewed through the biblical framework of Creation, the Flood and man’s position in God’s order.

1. Creation

According to Genesis 1, God program­med all animals to reproduce after their kind. And that’s precisely what we observe—rhinos giving birth to rhinos. Evolutionists like to point to the different rhino species (living and extinct—see box on opposite page) as evidence of evolution.8 But speciation merely shows up the fantastic built-in variation within the originally-created kind9—it is not ‘uphill’ molecules-to-mammals evolution but rather a ‘downhill’ change, as each rhino ‘species’ is carrying a subset of the original genetic information that God put into the original created rhinoceros kind.10 All rhino species are still rhinos! Recently researchers reported hybrid offspring from mating between different rhino ‘species’.11 This is no surprise to creationists—it’s simply mem­bers of the same kind reproducing ‘after their kind’, just as the Creator originally programmed them to do.12

2. Flood

According to the Bible, the global Flood of Noah’s day (Genesis 6–9) wiped out all air-breathing land animals and birds—except for those Noah took on board the Ark. So today’s rhinos are all descended from the pair of rhinos released from the Ark after the Flood.13

Photo SXC.hu Two-horned rhinos

On two-horned rhinos, it is the front (anterior) horn which is longer. The biggest horn on record, from a female white rhino in South Africa, measured 158 cm (over 5 ft).

The geographical distribution of rhinoceros populations thus reflects a post-Flood dispersion from the Ark’s landing site on the ‘mountains of Ararat’ (Genesis 8:4). Today, rhinos are increasingly confined to scattered national parks and reserves in the dry savannah of Africa, the river valleys of India and the tropical jungles of southeast Asia. However, historically the rhinoceros inhabited the Middle East and Europe as well as most of Africa and Asia—absolutely consistent with rhinos multiplying and spreading out from the Ark.14

In the 4,500 years since the Flood, there was ample time for the rhinoceros to have multiplied from just two animals up to such large population levels—nicely re-demonstrated for us today in the way that endangered rhino populations have recently bounced back from low numbers. For example, under conservation management, the white rhino has gone from ‘near extinction’ a few decades ago to now being 11,000-strong. Similarly the Indian rhino was down to a mere dozen individuals in 1908, but now over 2,000 Indian rhinos live in protected parks.15

By the way, the cataclysmic watery upheaval described in Genesis 6–9 gives us a great explanation for the fossils—why we find billions of dead things buried in rock layers obviously laid down by water all over the earth. But evolutionists instead say that the rock layers with fossils are a record of the order of evolution and extinction over billions of years—an interpretation which leaves them surprised when faced with evidence to the contrary. (E.g., see box on p. 32.)

3. The influence of Man

In stark contrast to the evolutionary line that man is just an evolved animal, the reality of man’s historical impact and ongoing influence on the rhinoceros fits exactly with what you’d expect from the Bible:

(a) The fact of man’s impact on rhino­ceros populations (rather than the other way around) shouts that man was made, just as is written in Genesis 1:28, to ‘fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over … every living thing that moves on the earth’. The authority/power over the animals originally entrusted to man by God is still clearly evident today—in fact, it’s so obvious that most people take it for granted. Rhinoceroses (or monkeys for that matter) don’t go to the zoo to see people!16

The very first man … arguably has had the biggest impact on the rhinoceros.

(b) The inescapable fact that it’s only under strict conservation management by humans that ‘endangered’ rhino species have pulled back from critically low levels reflects man’s God-given responsibility/authority to exercise good stewardship over the Creation. (To ‘subdue’ the earth and to ‘rule’ over the animals does NOT mean to wantonly or neglectfully ‘destroy’ it/them! The Hebrew word for dominion, רדה (radah), is also used for Solomon’s dominion that resulted in peace, safety and ‘each man under his own vine and fig tree’ (1 Kings 4:24–25).17)

(c) It was the very first man who arguably has had the biggest impact on the rhinoceros. The first man’s sin resulted in the whole Creation being cursed, inaugurating death to the animals—which ultimately has even led to the extinction of whole kinds (not just species) of animals.18

Conclusion

Accepting the Bible’s account of history helps us to understand our world. Thus equipped, the notion that the rhinoceros (or indeed, anything else) could have evolved is indeed preposterous.


Rhinos big, small, and woolly

Université de Liège

Ancient cave paintings

Ancient cave paintings in France depict woolly mammoths, bison, lions, horses and this woolly rhino. Standard evolutionary thinking ascribes these paintings to ‘primitive Stone Age’ individuals who are somehow mentally inferior to modern man. Rather, the evidence indicates great artistic ability, so there is no reason to believe that anyone other than people just like us created these animal paintings. Man has been intelligent from the very beginning.

As well as the five living species of rhino—two in Africa (black, white), and three in Asia (Sumatran, Indian, Javan)—there were once other rhino species, which are extinct today. There was the two-horned woolly rhino, which roamed the colder climates in Europe and Asia, and had long shaggy hair.1

The extinct Teleoceras was a much smaller rhino, standing only about one metre (3–4 ft) tall and weighing about 140 kg (300 lb).2 It had a build similar to that of a hippopotamus, and also probably spent much time in water. Large numbers of Teleoceras were catastrophically buried in the Ashfall deposits of Nebraska, leaving well preserved skeletons. They are so plentiful that the main section of Ashfall is nicknamed ‘Rhino Barn’.

And the largest land mammal fossil to have ever been discovered was quite possibly an extinct type of rhino—Indricother­ium (also known as Baluchitherium and Paraceratherium). Its remains have been found in central and south Asia;3 it looked something like a short-necked, hornless giraffe. It had a massive body—weighing up to an estimated 33 tonnes4 and standing 5.5 metres (18 ft) at the shoulder.3 It would easily have dwarfed even an adult bull elephant today.

It’s possible that the Indricotherium, Teleoceras and woolly rhino, along with other descendants of the Ark animals, may have died out in catastrophes at the end of the Ice Age, some 4,000 years ago.5

References and notes

  1. Woolly rhino, International Rhino Foundation, www.rhinos-irf.org/education/rhinofactsfiles/rhinofacts/extinctrhinos/woolly/, 18 May 2005.
  2. Prehistoric life, SOS Rhino, www.sos rhino.org/news/rhinonews070303b.php, 18 May 2005.
  3. Indricotherium, www.paleocraft.com/Indricotherium2.html, 18 May 2005.
  4. Peters, D., Giants, Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., New York, p. 10, 1986.
  5. See Sarfati, J., Mammoth—riddle of the Ice Age, Creation 22(2):10–15, 2000.

The ‘Giant Unicorn’ seen and described

MorgueFile

The giant unicorn

Reconstructions from fossils of the ‘giant unicorn’ Elasmotherium sibiricus show it was a rhino­ceros two metres high (over six ft) and six metres long, with a single two-metre-long horn growing from its forehead.1,2 The fossils were found in Pleistocene strata, which evolutionists date from to 2,500,000 years to 10,000 years ago. So on that basis, they say that Elas­mother­ium has been extinct at least 10,000 years.

However, a description of an animal matching this fossil, from a 10th century AD traveller to Russia, shows Elasmotherium may have still been alive only 1,000 years ago:

‘There is nearby a wide steppe, and there dwells, it is told, an animal smaller than a camel, but taller than a bull. Its head is the head of a ram, and its tail is a bull’s tail. Its body is that of a mule and its hooves are like those of a bull. In the middle of its head it has a horn, thick and round, and as the horn goes higher, it narrows (to an end), until it is like a spearhead. Some of these horns grow to three or five ells, depending on the size of the animal. It thrives on the leaves of trees … . Whenever it sees a rider, it approaches and if the rider has a fast horse, the horse tries to escape by running fast, and if the beast overtakes them, it picks the rider out of the saddle with its horn, and tosses him in the air … until the rider dies. … The locals seek it in the steppe and in the forest until they can kill it. … [T]hey climb the tall trees between which the animal passes. It requires several bow- men with poisoned arrows … . And indeed I have seen three big bowls shaped like Yemen seashells, that the king has, and he told me that they are made out of that animal’s horn.’3

When animals that evolutionists say have been long extinct turn out to have lived alongside humans more recently, it ought to be no surprise to Christians. For God has said that He created all the animals in the same week that He created man (Genesis 1, 2; Exodus 20:11), around 6,000 years ago.

References and notes

  1. Encyclopædia Britannica, 15th edition, 4:416, 1992.
  2. Some have argued that the widespread unicorn myths might have been derived from stories about this animal. Note that the ‘unicorn’ referred to in the Authorized (King James) Version of the Bible (e.g. in Job 39:9–10) is not the animal of legend, but likely a (two-horned) wild ox seen in profile. See Wieland, C., The unicorn—the Bible does not refer to fantasy animals, Creation 14(2):14–15, 1992.
  3. Elasmotherium, Wikipedia, www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Elasmotherium, 4 November 2005.

References and notes

  1. Nowak, R.M., Walker’s Mammals of the World, 5th edition, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, p. 1332, 1991. Return to text.
  2. Capstick, P.H., Death in the long grass, St. Martin’s Press, New York, p. 238, 1977. Return to text.
  3. Black rhinoceros, Sedgwick County Zoo, www.scz.org/animals/r/rhino.html, 18 May 2005. Return to text.
  4. From an evolutionary perspective, anything before human-recorded history is ‘prehistoric’. But the Bible’s historical account takes us right back to the creation of time (Genesis 1:1; 2 Timothy 1:9; Titus 1:2). Before this, only the triune God existed (John 1:1). Return to text.
  5. See Sarfati, J., The non-evolution of the horse, Creation 21(3):28–31, 1999. Return to text.
  6. Horse tales, Creation 28(1):9, 2005. Return to text.
  7. The horse’s tale, Science 309(5733):378, 2005. Return to text.
  8. Orlando, L., et al., Ancient DNA analysis reveals woolly rhino evolutionary relationships, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 28:485–499, 2003. Return to text.
  9. Wieland, C., Muddy waters, Creation 23(3):26–29, 2001. Return to text.
  10. See Wieland, C., The evolution train’s a-comin’ (Sorry, a-goin’—in the wrong direction), Creation 24(2):16–19, 2002. Return to text.
  11. Robinson, T.J. et al., Interspecific hybridisation in rhinoceroses: Confirmation of a Black x White rhinoceros hybrid by karyotype, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and microsatellite analysis, Conservation Genetics 6(1):141–145, 2005. Return to text.
  12. Batten, D., Ligers and wholphins? What next? Creation 22(3):28–33, 2000. Return to text.
  13. Assuming that Noah understood ‘clean’ and ‘unclean’ the same way that God later decreed to Moses (Leviticus 11:3–4,26; Deuteronomy 14:6), only one pair of rhinos, rather than seven specimens, was taken on board the Ark (Genesis 7:2). Return to text.
  14. Note that the rhino apparently did not reach the Bering Strait and ‘Wallace’s Line’ (see Creation 27(4):35, 2005—footnote 3) until after the end of the Ice Age—the lower sea levels during the Ice Age provided land bridges that other animals had used to move into the Americas and Australia. See Oard, M., An Ice Age caused by the Genesis Flood, ICR, California, 1990. Return to text.
  15. Rhinos, World Wildlife Fund, 18 May 2005. Return to text.
  16. However, London Zoo recently exhibited eight scantily clad men and women in the bear enclosure, saying that it ‘teaches members of the public that the human is just another primate’. See ‘Humans in zoo—by choice’, Creation 28(1):7, 2005. Return to text.
  17. Wieland, C. and Sarfati., J., Earth Day: is Christianity to blame for environment problems?, 20 March 2002. Return to text.
  18. E.g. dinosaurs. Return to text.

“One little bit doesn’t make a difference.” It’s a good job CMI didn’t think like that. We had to start somewhere producing information, one word and one article at a time. Similarly, please don’t think your small donation doesn’t help. They can add together to bring a shower of blessings. Support this site

Copied to clipboard
4956
Product added to cart.
Click store to checkout.
In your shopping cart

Remove All Products in Cart
Go to store and Checkout
Go to store
Total price does not include shipping costs. Prices subject to change in accordance with your country’s store.