Share
A- A A+

Article from:

Creation  Volume 23Issue 3 Cover

Creation 23(3):18
June 2001

Free Email News
Creation magazine print - 1 yr new subn


US $25.00
View Item
The Creation Answers Book
by Various

US $14.00
View Item
frame top left frame top frame top right
frame left
Creation Magazine Volume 23 Issue 3 CoverFirst published:
Creation 23(3):18
June 2001
frame right
frame bottom leftframe bottomframe bottom right

Missing links in gene knowledge

The difference between the estimates of human gene number by the public consortium (31,000 genes) and the privately-funded Celera group (39,000 genes) left many wondering. However, as the two groups use different gene-identification techniques, their estimates are not directly comparable. Each of these estimates would be affected by even minor changes in laboratory procedure. For example, because of such changes to methodology, an initial estimate of 120,000 genes was lowered to 81,000—which also now seems indefensible.

This highlights the fact that in the study of molecular genetics there is still much uncertainty. A closer look at the scientific literature to see what researchers actually say about the current state of knowledge reveals just how little is yet known. (In stark contrast to the impression given by much of the popular daily news media.)

Researchers have described the recently-published sequence of the human genome as a 'rough draft'.1 Despite around 90% of the 'gene-rich'2 portion of the genome having been sequenced, only about a quarter of the whole genome is considered 'finished'.

The core difficulty is that the published sequences are not continuousthere are gaps. If there are too many gaps, it makes it difficult to clearly identify which base sequences belong to specific genes—some predicted genes could turn out to be 'pseudogenes', or just fragments of real genes. (Researchers concede that the evidence for at least 10,000 of these predicted genes is only weak.1) Also, until the sequence is 'finished', researchers won't know what is 'missing'—it might turn out that even 'gene-poor' areas will be critical for gene regulation.

A leading genetics expert aptly summed up the present state of knowledge when he cautioned, 'It is important to remember that no statements can be made with high precision because the draft sequences have holes and imperfections, and the tools for analysis remain limited …'.3

Related Magazine Articles

Message Mania
Creation 23:3 (June 2001)

References and notes

  1. Bork, P. and Copley, R., The draft sequences: Filling in the gaps, Nature 409(6822):818-­820, 2001.

  2. The estimated total size of the genome is 3.2 Gb (gigabases), with about 2.95 Gb being the gene-rich, 'euchromatic' portion. The remaining (heterochromatin) regions of chromosomes have not yet been examined.

  3. Baltimore, D., Our genome unveiled, Nature 409(6822):814-­816, 2001.


“One little bit doesn’t make a difference.” It’s a good job CMI didn’t think like that. We had to start somewhere producing information, one word and one article at a time. Similarly, please don’t think your small donation doesn’t help. They can add together to bring a shower of blessings. Support this site

Copied to clipboard
368
Product added to cart.
Click store to checkout.
In your shopping cart

Remove All Products in Cart
Go to store and Checkout
Go to store
Total price does not include shipping costs. Prices subject to change in accordance with your country’s store.